tapd.cn 46 D
🛡️ SEO 27 🤖 GEO 57 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 48

tapd.cn — Global SEODiff Score 46/100

tapd.cn
📊

With a 59/100 ACRI, tapd.cn has a moderate AI visibility profile — functional but not yet optimized for AI crawlers. Compared to other social sites (avg score: 57), tapd.cn performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 15% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. The 6.7× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

46
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than tapd.cn?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)27 × 0.25 = 6.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)57 × 0.40 = 22.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)48 × 0.15 = 7.2
Weighted sum = 6.8 + 22.8 + 9.4 + 7.2
Global SEODiff Score = 46 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
94
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #64700
+49 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 55%
Score 59/100

tapd.cn punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tapd.cn ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat6.7×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

27/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

478 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh_CN
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

57/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tapd.cn
27
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 15%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words163
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

38
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability38/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (25.2 KB)Bloat (143.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.7× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 45 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.0% · SNR: 0.18 · Signal: 6460 / Noise: 36696 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerAPISIX/2.13.1
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1294 ms
Raw HTML Size168.6 KB
Visible Text Size25.2 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1294 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

868
DOM nodes
169 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

48/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

126
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh_CN
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 27/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tapd.cn
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tapd.cn" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tapd.cn" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 54 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
27
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
40
Avg across 54 pages · Range 32–67
Total Words
11153
Avg Bloat
86.8×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.tapd.cn/official/release_note
更新日志-TAPD
other 67 15.2× 3298
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001000885
TAPD客户案例
other 52 44.0× 266
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001040
TAPD客户案例
other 52 58.1× 212
https://www.tapd.cn/official/select_version
TAPD-敏捷开发 项目管理 腾讯敏捷产品研发平台
pricing 49 73.4× 327 💰 Pricing
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001000890
TAPD客户案例
other 49 52.8× 216
https://www.tapd.cn/official/solution_example/hr
行政人事解决方案-TAPD
product 42 75.0× 166
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001016
TAPD客户案例
other 42 79.7× 149
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001212
TAPD客户案例
other 42 75.5× 161
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001000898
TAPD客户案例
other 42 71.7× 166
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001014
TAPD客户案例
other 42 62.7× 188
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001023
TAPD客户案例
other 42 69.7× 169
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001046
TAPD客户案例
other 42 82.9× 143
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001031
TAPD客户案例
other 42 80.6× 147
https://www.tapd.cn/official/solution_example/dev
研发管理解决方案-TAPD
product 42 74.2× 171
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001000873
TAPD客户案例
other 42 70.2× 172
https://www.tapd.cn/official/solution_example/market
市场营销解决方案-TAPD
pricing 42 74.8× 171 💰 Pricing
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001001215
TAPD客户案例
other 42 62.6× 191
https://www.tapd.cn/official/case_example/1120106291001000884
TAPD客户案例
other 42 80.3× 146
https://www.tapd.cn/official/solution/agile
TAPD-高效敏捷项目管理解决方案
product 39 73.8× 166
https://www.tapd.cn/official/security
TAPD-安全保障
trust 39 79.3× 146
Showing 20 of 54 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/official/ 42 41 0% 81.6× High JS Bloat
/help/ 2 34 1% 253.1× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 36 0% 76.7× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 36 0% 76.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/forum/ 1 33 1% 63.4× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 36 0% 76.8× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tapd.cn

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tapd.cn. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tapd.cn (this site) 27 59 Custom / Proprietary 6.7× 0
reibert.info 52 76 Custom / Proprietary 6.4× 0 Compare →
smokinstangs.com 52 72 Custom / Proprietary 6.3× 0 Compare →
autocosmos.com.ar 52 67 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 0 Compare →
texags.com 52 67 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
x-true.info 52 70 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tapd.cn when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tapd.cn. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Tapd",
  "url": "https://tapd.cn",
  "logo": "https://tapd.cn/favicon_new.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Tapd",
  "url": "https://tapd.cn",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tapd.cn/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tapd.cn:

Current Score
59
Projected Score
72
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →