tekniikkatalous.fi 36 F
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 44 ⚡ Perf 42 🏗️ Arch 83

tekniikkatalous.fi — Global SEODiff Score 36/100

tekniikkatalous.fi
📊

With only 15/100 on the AI-Readiness Index, tekniikkatalous.fi is at severe risk of being overlooked by AI-powered search and answer engines. In the developer sector, tekniikkatalous.fi underperforms relative to the average (57), indicating room for competitive improvement. A ghost ratio of 30% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are restricted by robots.txt — the site has limited accessibility to AI search.

36
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with Performance (42).
🎯 Top Fix: Allow GPTBot + ClaudeBot in robots.txt → lift the score cap
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than tekniikkatalous.fi?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)44 × 0.40 = 17.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)42 × 0.20 = 8.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 17.6 + 8.4 + 12.4
⚠️ Fatal multiplier: All major AI bots blocked → ×0.5
Global SEODiff Score = 36 (F)
🚫
Gatekeeper Rule: Score cannot exceed 15. Both GPTBot and ClaudeBot are blocked in robots.txt. No major AI assistant can cite this site. Allow at least one major AI crawler to lift the cap. See Bot Access →
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
20
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
49
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 7%
Rank #65976
+61 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 67%
Score 15/100

tekniikkatalous.fi punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tekniikkatalous.fi ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Allow GPTBot in robots.txt so AI crawlers can access your pages (see Crawl Access).
  • Allow ClaudeBot (many assistants rely on it) — blocking it often correlates with “AI invisibility.”
  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

16 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

101 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Tekniikka&Talous
  • ✓ og:description — Tekniikka&Talous tarjoaa oivalluksia, näköaloja ja hyötytietoa teknologiasta ja sen vaikutuksista.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

44/100 40 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tekniikkatalous.fi
29
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 222.3x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Blocked
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Blocked
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Blocked
Google-Extended
Blocked
Googlebot
Allowed
💡GPTBot is blocked. To appear in ChatGPT citations, add Allow: / under User-agent: GPTBot in your robots.txt.
💡ClaudeBot is blocked. To be cited by Claude, allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt.

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 49/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 30 elements (30 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words425
Raw Density7.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

36
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
Critical
Blocklist Risk
Extractability36/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskCritical — 4 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (4.2 KB)Bloat (928.3 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context0% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage0 / 16 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 932.5 KB, but only 4.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 0% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.6% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 1073 / Noise: 237649 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerCloudFront
CDNcloudfront
HTTP Status200
Load Time1486 ms
Raw HTML Size932.5 KB
Visible Text Size4.2 KB

Performance & Speed

42/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1486 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

928
DOM nodes
932 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudfront

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/sitemaps/sitemapindex.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✗ GPTBot allowed
  • ✗ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

53
internal links
12
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → fi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 29/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tekniikkatalous.fi
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tekniikkatalous.fi" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tekniikkatalous.fi" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 67 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
29
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
41
Avg across 67 pages · Range 0–58
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
25091
Avg Bloat
302.1×
RAG Fractures [?]
50
⚠️
50 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 50 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/394e0a46-1637-472b-b93a-5eb6bba04da0
Suomalaismepit huolestuivat siitä, mitä Yhdysvallat voi tehdä – "Kiristää meitä jo nyt" | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 100.1× 1156 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/58e4bbba-d276-47b1-8b34-db98d62d0f7c
Uusi kiinalaisauto yllättää huimalla 451 kW lataustehollaan – Enemmän kuin Suomessa on tarjolla | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 79.8× 1558 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/07fe03cf-16f6-43bc-92cd-b135e49d6db2
Ydinvoimasta uusi vääntö – Fortum ja PVO ajautuivat eri linjoille | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 224.3× 502 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/13344697-d29f-4fef-beca-819af39e318e
Historian ensimmäinen älypuhelin oli täysi floppi | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 145.7× 792 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/d2e7cf61-ef10-41cd-b379-27036785fc97
Asiantuntijoilta varoitus: Vesiliirtoakin vaarallisempi ilmiö iskee juuri nyt | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 144.9× 777 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/803d340d-b7eb-4477-8122-7b5ad9571da7
Tässä museossa esitellään suomalaisia autoja, joita ei koskaan valmistettu | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 138.6× 843 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/80ec01d1-3da0-454f-96f4-26cbbeeb4b6f
Valtion rahoitusyhtiö tarjoaa yrityksille 300 M€ kasvuruisketta | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 217.0× 511 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/14db85d5-18a2-4999-9479-58ae32ba331a
Kuorolaulu voi vaikuttaa aivoihin yllättävällä tavalla – Suomalainen väitöskirja teki merkittävän löydön | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 176.5× 635 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/69c4a9a7-58e4-4684-ae73-83003672f5b0
Tässä ovat Euroopan myydyimmät autot – Ykkösen myynti kasvoi +12 % | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 204.5× 572 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/f0c32411-d6b1-4634-aac5-af2b4e954794
Aivopähkinä: Presidentti valehtelee 6:na päivänä viikossa – Milloin hän puhuu totta? | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 197.4× 578 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/b34e96e9-19fd-4b5c-a261-3a7d53563cdf
Venäjän armeija kiduttaa nyt Ukrainassa omiaan sähköllä ja virtsalla – Ja teloittaa maakuoppiin, jos et lähde itsemurhamyllyyn | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 184.5× 619 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/34f90b18-0b5b-4557-8d23-e7ef58cbc3c9
Ukraina käyttää venäläisiä vastaan droneja silloinkin, kun tykistö olisi parempi työkalu – Karu syy | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 156.9× 736 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/c2294c49-519a-4577-b4b1-6e0e25e74797
138-metrinen Venäjän valtion alus pyöri Upinniemen varuskunnan edustalla Suomen aluevesillä – Rakennettu neuvostoaikana Helsingin telakalla | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 171.8× 676 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/430e62a5-4524-4b68-95cd-8ae24115d5a3
Hapero korkki petti, moottori sammui ja jyrkkä kaarto turvaan epäonnistui – kohtalokas heikkous selvisi vasta onnettomuuden jälkeen | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 185.3× 612 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/e8846dbf-794a-4623-b657-1c4507b11faf
Maailman suurin 30 GWh:n jättiakku tukeutuu poikkeukselliseen akkukemiaan | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 58 217.3× 521 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/706cd3e6-ebbd-4c72-9523-7fdc041fee73
Linus Torvalds puhui seuraajastaan – Mutta ei aivan tosissaan | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 48 270.5× 402 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/14dcb593-86e5-413a-8114-e97228d58653
Jopa 2 miljoonassa autossa väitetään olevan vakava istuinvika | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 48 243.6× 454 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/6bef209d-4c5c-44b7-8242-3e1ae164afae
Suuri tietomurto Telialla: Tuhansien asiakkaiden työntekijöiden ja yksityishenkilöiden tiedot vietiin | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 48 236.9× 468 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/87da5221-9ed5-4403-9aae-860a51633974
Kolmen Nato-maan hävittäjät ilmassa Venäjän iskujen ja ilmatilan loukkauksen takia, asukkaille hälytysviesti | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 48 329.7× 334 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/a/bd19b496-6d92-4049-bc0d-1b7e8b5c921d
Finnairin Airbus A319:n kiertely herätti ihmetystä – Asialle löytyi luonnollinen syy | Tekniikka&Talous
pricing 48 401.7× 271 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 67 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/uutiset/ 51 51 1% 275.4× Bot Blocked
/tyo-ura/ 1 40 1% 363.9× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/kumppaniblogit/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/lehti/ 1 40 1% 485.9× Bot Blocked
/tekniikanhistoria/ 1 30 1% 1829.5× Bot Blocked
/viikko/ 1 30 1% 1735.3× Bot Blocked
/metallitekniikka/ 1 30 1% 1780.6× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 67 pages
tilaukset.almamedia.fi ×56
uutiskirje.tekniikkatalous.fi ×56
almamedia.fi ×56
twitter.com ×56
facebook.com ×56
linkedin.com ×56
uutiskirje.autot.tekniikkatalous.fi ×8
kauppalehti.fi ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tekniikkatalous.fi

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tekniikkatalous.fi. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tekniikkatalous.fi (this site) 29 15 Custom / Proprietary 222.3× 0
gstreamer.org 54 77 Custom / Proprietary 6.2× 0 Compare →
cl0secall.net 54 70 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
myget.org 54 73 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 1 Compare →
gearset.com 54 69 Custom / Proprietary 8.8× 1 Compare →
packt-cdn.com 54 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tekniikkatalous.fi when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tekniikkatalous.fi. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Tekniikkatalous",
  "url": "https://tekniikkatalous.fi",
  "logo": "https://assets.almatalent.fi/static/favicon/tt/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Tekniikkatalous",
  "url": "https://tekniikkatalous.fi",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tekniikkatalous.fi/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Allow GPTBot in robots.txt
High Impact ⏱ 2 min
GPTBot is blocked — your content cannot appear in ChatGPT citations. Add this to your robots.txt:
text
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /

User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Allow ClaudeBot in robots.txt
Medium Impact ⏱ 2 min
ClaudeBot is restricted — Claude may not be able to cite your content. Many AI assistants rely on it.
text
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /

User-agent: anthropic-ai
Allow: /
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tekniikkatalous.fi:

Current Score
15
Projected Score
46
Improvement
+31 pts
Allow GPTBot +8 pts
Allow ClaudeBot +5 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →