tennis.com 56 D
🛡️ SEO 31 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 46 🏗️ Arch 93

tennis.com — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

tennis.com
📊

With a solid 72/100 ACRI, tennis.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 73% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), tennis.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 33.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Rich structured data (5 schema blocks) gives AI systems strong semantic signals for entity recognition and knowledge graph inclusion. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (31) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (33×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 2 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 21 ACRI -1 (52→51)
📈 Mar 18 ACRI +2 (50→52)
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than tennis.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)31 × 0.25 = 7.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)46 × 0.20 = 9.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 7.8 + 24.8 + 9.2 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
28
Structure
avg 35
50
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 3%
Rank #32166
+24 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 27%
Score 72/100

tennis.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tennis.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage5 blocks
Token bloat33.0×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

31/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

59 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

46 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 49
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.tennis.com/index_include
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Tennis Live Scores News Videos Player Rankings | Tennis.com
  • ✓ og:description — Tennis Live Scores News Videos Player Rankings
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tennis.com
51
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 28/100 — Low
Structured Elements 53 elements (53 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2204
Raw Density2.4%
💡Low structure score (28/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 53 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks5 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

48
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability48/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (13.5 KB)Bloat (433.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio33.0× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage169 / 169 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 446.6 KB, but only 13.5 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (33.0×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.0% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 3463 / Noise: 110878 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of tennis.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Tennis.com provides comprehensive tennis content, including news, scores, reviews, and lifestyle features.
Target Audience
Tennis fans, enthusiasts, and readers interested in the sport's lifestyle.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique blend of news, lifestyle content, and community engagement.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time660 ms
Raw HTML Size446.6 KB
Visible Text Size13.5 KB

Performance & Speed

46/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

660 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4850
DOM nodes
447 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=30
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.tennis.com/sitemap-index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

252
internal links
25
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 51/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tennis.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tennis.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tennis.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 100 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
51
Single-page score
+10
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
62
Avg across 100 pages · Range 0–69
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
79211
Avg Bloat
40.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/naomi-osaka-talks-legacy-i-would-hope-that-i-m-someone-who-made-it-easier-for-the-generation-after
Naomi Osaka talks legacy: “I would hope ... that I’m someone who made it easier for the generation after" | Tennis.com
blog 69 47.4× 762
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/stan-wawrinka-first-40-year-old-in-top-100-of-atp-rankings-since-roger-federer-cilic-muchova-sakkari-mboko
Stan Wawrinka becomes first 40-something to be ranked in ATP Top 100 since Roger Federer | Tennis.com
blog 69 38.0× 897
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/jessica-pegula-has-an-answer-to-zheng-qinwen-s-hilarious-question-on-player-s-box-podcast
Jessica Pegula has an answer to Zheng Qinwen's 'hilarious' question on "Player's Box" podcast | Tennis.com
blog 69 51.4× 665
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/carlos-alcaraz-and-jannik-sinner-return-in-doha-while-elena-rybakina-leads-a-strong-field-at-the-wta-1000-in-dubai
Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner return in Doha, while Elena Rybakina leads a strong field at the WTA 1000 in Dubai | Tennis.com
blog 69 42.1× 909
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/sinner-fritz-which-atp-star-use-promising-indian-wells-result-bnp-paribas-open
Sinner, Fritz, or someone else: Which ATP star could use a promising Indian Wells result? | Tennis.com
blog 69 31.0× 1254
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/17-years-after-indian-wells-title-vera-zvonareva-41-takes-comeback-one-day-at-a-time
17 years after Indian Wells title, Vera Zvonareva, 41, takes comeback “one day at a time” | Tennis.com
blog 69 23.8× 1697
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/eugenie-bouchard-indian-wells-ideal-stage-for-ben-shelton-fly-usa-flag-picks
Eugenie Bouchard: Indian Wells is an ideal stage for Ben Shelton to fly U.S. flag | Tennis.com
blog 69 47.4× 717
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/daniil-medvedev-wins-dubai-title-after-injured-tallon-griekspoor-pulls-out-of-final
Daniil Medvedev wins Dubai title after injured Tallon Griekspoor pulls out of final | Tennis.com
blog 69 43.2× 804
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/another-gold-medalist-in-the-family-rafael-nadal-hits-the-slopes-with-wife-mery-and-son-rafa-jr
Another gold medalist in the family? Rafael Nadal hits the slopes with wife Mery and son Rafa Jr. | Tennis.com
blog 69 52.9× 681
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/the-bnp-paribas-open-will-send-2026-into-a-higher-gear-which-of-the-women-could-use-a-kick-start-of-her-own
The BNP Paribas Open will send 2026 into a higher gear. Which of the women could use a kick start of her own? | Tennis.com
blog 69 28.1× 1429
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/will-carlos-alcaraz-remain-undefeated-through-indian-wells-tc-analysts-think-so
Will Carlos Alcaraz remain undefeated through Indian Wells? TC Analysts think so | Tennis.com
blog 69 49.3× 687
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/more-mandatory-events-fewer-points-daniil-medvedev-pitches-radical-atp-rankings-overhaul
More mandatory events, fewer points: Daniil Medvedev pitches radical ATP rankings overhaul | Tennis.com
blog 69 34.3× 1067
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/miomir-kecmanovic-maiden-top-10-top-5-wins-against-alexander-zverev-acapulco
Miomir Kecmanovic has now scored maiden Top 10 and Top 5 wins against Alexander Zverev with Acapulco effort | Tennis.com
blog 69 58.3× 587
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/sam-querrey-look-for-iga-swiatek-to-kickstart-2026-season-at-indian-wells
Sam Querrey: Look for Iga Swiatek to kickstart 2026 season at Indian Wells | Tennis.com
blog 69 50.6× 673
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/roger-federer-international-tennis-hall-of-fame-the-big-t-podcast
Patrick McEnroe on Roger Federer and the International Tennis Hall of Fame induction process | Tennis.com
blog 69 29.6× 1263
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/tennis-channel-returns-us-home-bnp-paribas-open-first-last-ball-coverage-indian-wells
Tennis Channel returns as the U.S. home of the BNP Paribas Open, delivering wall-to-wall coverage from Indian Wells | Tennis.com
blog 69 29.9× 1237
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/eugenie-bouchard-the-sky-s-the-limit-for-victoria-mboko-in-indian-wells
Eugenie Bouchard: The sky’s the limit for Victoria Mboko in Indian Wells | Tennis.com
blog 69 55.7× 636
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/seven-things-at-stake-at-indian-wells-alcaraz-sinner-djokovic-sabalenka-swiatek
Streaks, records, milestones and more: Seven things at stake in Indian Wells | Tennis.com
blog 69 28.8× 1231
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/stan-wawrinka-there-will-be-opportunities-to-challenge-carlos-alcaraz-jannik-sinner
Stan Wawrinka: There will be opportunities to challenge Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner | Tennis.com
blog 69 47.5× 691
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/where-to-watch-indian-wells-the-2026-bnp-paribas-open-is-only-on-tennis-channel
Where to Watch Indian Wells: The 2026 BNP Paribas Open is only on Tennis Channel | Tennis.com
blog 69 26.6× 1412
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 90 68 0% 43.1× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 54 0% 130.9× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 100 pages
instagram.com ×91
sbgi.net ×90
twitter.com ×90
play.google.com ×90
apps.apple.com ×90
youtube.com ×90
edyy.fa.us2.oraclecloud.com ×90
facebook.com ×90
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tennis.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tennis.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tennis.com (this site) 51 72 Custom / Proprietary 33.0× 5
sortmund.pl 76 85 Custom / Proprietary 9.2× 2 Compare →
awayholidays.co.uk 76 83 Custom / Proprietary 4.0× 2 Compare →
ai-med.jp 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 2 Compare →
rus-lang.ru 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0 Compare →
ursmu.ru 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tennis.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tennis.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Tennis",
  "url": "https://tennis.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tennis.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Tennis?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Tennis does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Tennis work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Tennis."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tennis.com:

Current Score
72
Projected Score
84
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →