theyesmen.org 55 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 59 ⚡ Perf 68 🏗️ Arch 71

theyesmen.org — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

theyesmen.org
📊

With a solid 70/100 ACRI, theyesmen.org is well-positioned for AI search — better than 67% of sites in the Radar. Within the education vertical, this places theyesmen.org above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The bloated 25.1× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (25×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 6 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than theyesmen.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)59 × 0.40 = 23.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)68 × 0.20 = 13.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)71 × 0.15 = 10.7
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 23.6 + 13.6 + 10.7
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
42
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 29%
Rank #291844
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

theyesmen.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why theyesmen.org ranks here

Tech stackDrupal
Industryeducation
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat25.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

18 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

159 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://theyesmen.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Home
  • ✓ og:description — We’re an ever-expanding and increasingly diverse group of co-conspirators who, mainly, partner with activist groups on creative tactics to further campaigns.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

59/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, melbourneschool.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
theyesmen.org
45
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. melbourneschool.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 42/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 38 elements (38 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words716
Raw Density5.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

42
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability42/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (13.4 KB)Bloat (322.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio25.1× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context47% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage8 / 17 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 335.4 KB, but only 13.4 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (25.1×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 47% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.0% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 3422 / Noise: 82449 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of theyesmen.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The Yes Men provide activist organizations and students with strategic support to disrupt corporate campaigns and raise awareness for important
Target Audience
Activist organizations, student groups, campaign organizers, educators, and individuals interested in social and political activism.
Pricing Model
Donations to support operations, with an online store offering merchandise for purchase.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique blend of strategic disruption, creative tactics, and a focus on long-term systemic change, combined with a strong network of allies and a history of successful campaigns.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Resource linksCC licensePress pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Limited online resources for campaign strategy
• Difficulty in finding collaborators and building campaigns independently
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-13

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkDrupal
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time580 ms
Raw HTML Size335.4 KB
Visible Text Size13.4 KB

Performance & Speed

68/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

580 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

704
DOM nodes
335 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → must-revalidate, no-cache, private
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

71/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

141
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 45/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for theyesmen.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/theyesmen.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=theyesmen.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 9 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
45
Single-page score
-34
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
11
Avg across 9 pages · Range 0–56
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 45, but internal pages average only 11 — a -34-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
1%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1725
Avg Bloat
27.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://theyesmen.org/about
About us | The Yes Men
about 56 51.3× 1414
https://theyesmen.org/blog
Rants and reflections | The Yes Men
pricing 46 192.6× 311 💰 Pricing
https://theyesmen.org/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://theyesmen.org/faq support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 46 0% 192.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 56 0% 51.3× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 9 pages
twitter.com ×2
facebook.com ×2
theconnextion.com ×1
nytimes.com ×1
actipedia.org ×1
goodreads.com ×1
wagingnonviolence.org ×1
carriagetrade.org ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/theyesmen.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to theyesmen.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
theyesmen.org (this site) 45 70 Drupal 25.1× 0
nwpolytech.ca 70 79 Drupal 2.3× 0 Compare →
tu-freiberg.de 70 79 Drupal 3.6× 0 Compare →
stu.edu 70 86 WordPress 22.3× 1 Compare →
recwell.berkeley.edu 70 83 WordPress 21.1× 1 Compare →
size.co.uk 70 88 Nuxt.js 19.0× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite theyesmen.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to theyesmen.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Theyesmen",
  "url": "https://theyesmen.org",
  "logo": "https://theyesmen.org/logo.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Theyesmen",
  "url": "https://theyesmen.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://theyesmen.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Theyesmen?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Theyesmen does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Theyesmen work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Theyesmen."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for theyesmen.org:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →