time.is 57 D
🛡️ SEO 44 🤖 GEO 52 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 70

time.is — Global SEODiff Score 57/100

time.is
📊

time.is achieves a 67/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places time.is above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. Heavy markup overhead (32.9× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

57
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (44) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (33×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📈 Mar 20 ACRI +1 (40→41)
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (41→40)
Does your site score higher than time.is?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)44 × 0.25 = 11.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)70 × 0.15 = 10.5
Weighted sum = 11.0 + 20.8 + 14.8 + 10.5
Global SEODiff Score = 57 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
55
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #10870
+40 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

time.is punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why time.is ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat32.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

44/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

50 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

90 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ca
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
time.is
41
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 32.9x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 55/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 34 elements (34 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words372
Raw Density9.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

41
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability41/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (55/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (2.8 KB)Bloat (89.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio32.9× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage1 / 1 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 91.8 KB, but only 2.8 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (32.9×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.0% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 713 / Noise: 22793 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of time.is and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Time.is provides real-time time and location information globally, including time zone details, sunrise/sunset times, holidays, and population data, synchronized with
Target Audience
Users seeking accurate time information, travelers, developers needing time zone data, and anyone requiring location-based time information.
Pricing Model
Free to use; no subscription fees.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Accuracy and reliability through atomic clock synchronization and continuous updates from the IANA Time Zone Database, combined with a lightweight and responsive design.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Limited integration capabilities
• Lack of advanced features beyond basic time display
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-07

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time556 ms
Raw HTML Size91.8 KB
Visible Text Size2.8 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

556 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

375
DOM nodes
92 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

70/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

151
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ca
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 41/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for time.is
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/time.is" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=time.is" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 21 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
41
Single-page score
-15
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
26
Avg across 21 pages · Range 0–55
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 41, but internal pages average only 26 — a -15-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
0%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
5417
Avg Bloat
30.2×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://time.is/about
About Time.is
about 55 24.1× 793
https://time.is/api
Time in Api, Sabah, Malaysia now
pricing 42 52.2× 380 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/guides
Time in Guides Hill, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan now
pricing 42 48.7× 413 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/help
Time in Helpman, Groningen, Netherlands now
pricing 42 48.1× 413 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/docs
Time in Docstone Woods, Virginia, United States now
pricing 42 50.3× 401 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/blog
Time in Blogna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy now
pricing 42 45.6× 440 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/demo
Time in Demo, Lombardy, Italy now
pricing 42 45.1× 443 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/faq
FAQ
support 42 39.6× 449
https://time.is/support
Time for Supporters Range, Antarctica now
pricing 42 46.6× 431 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/security
Time in Security, Maryland, United States now
pricing 42 51.2× 394 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/trust
Time in Trust, Eastern Cape, South Africa now
pricing 42 52.8× 380 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/careers
Time for Careers Center, Maryland, United States now
pricing 42 49.8× 404 💰 Pricing
https://time.is/contact
Contact Time.is
support 36 79.2× 76
https://time.is/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/resources blog 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/solutions product 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://time.is/get-started conversion 0 0.0× 0
Showing 20 of 21 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/careers/ 1 42 1% 49.8× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/get-started/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 55 0% 24.1× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 42 1% 52.2× Bot Blocked
/guides/ 1 42 1% 48.7× Bot Blocked
/security/ 1 42 1% 51.2× Bot Blocked
/trust/ 1 42 1% 52.8× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/resources/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/help/ 1 42 1% 48.1× Bot Blocked
/demo/ 1 42 1% 45.1× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 36 0% 79.2× High JS Bloat
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 21 pages
saatkac.info.tr ×13
google.com ×10
rarediseaseday.org ×7
ardissone.com ×1
mpg.is ×1
zmt3.com ×1
alioh.com ×1
northcode.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/time.is

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to time.is. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
time.is (this site) 41 67 Custom / Proprietary 32.9× 0
dublinchamber.org 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.8× 0 Compare →
stcn.com 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.7× 0 Compare →
spy.zyzhan.com 66 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 0 Compare →
monipla.jp 66 79 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 0 Compare →
dssl.ru 66 75 Custom / Proprietary 3.1× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite time.is when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 5 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

55
Homepage ACRI
41
Inner Avg ACRI
+14
ACRI Delta
50%
Homepage Ghost
62%
Inner Avg Ghost
17
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
42 70% pricing https://time.is/blog
42 70% pricing https://time.is/docs
42 70% support https://time.is/faq
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

16 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

21
Total Links
16
Unique Domains
4.2
Avg/Page
76%
Diversity
saatkac.info.tr google.com vk.com alioh.com stojkov.me geonames.org flottaltsaa.no ntppool.org derickrethans.nl iana.org
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 15.5

AI trust scores for the domains time.is links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to time.is. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Time",
  "url": "https://time.is",
  "logo": "https://time.is/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Time",
  "url": "https://time.is",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://time.is/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Time?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Time does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Time work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Time."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for time.is:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →