unisender.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 54 🤖 GEO 82 ⚡ Perf 40 🏗️ Arch 81

unisender.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

unisender.com
📊

With a solid 79/100 ACRI, unisender.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 91% of sites in the Radar. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), unisender.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 2.5× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 16 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than unisender.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)54 × 0.25 = 13.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)82 × 0.40 = 32.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)40 × 0.20 = 8.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)81 × 0.15 = 12.2
Weighted sum = 13.5 + 32.8 + 8.0 + 12.2
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
45
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 2%
Rank #24412
+7 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

unisender.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why unisender.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat2.5×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

54/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

49 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

272 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 14
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.unisender.com
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Unisender — сервис Email рассылок
  • ✓ og:description — Unisender — удобный сервис Email рассылок. Создавайте красивые письма за минуты. Смотрите статистику. Проводите A/B-тесты. Автоматизируйте. 1500 email бесплатно.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

82/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
unisender.com
61
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 45/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 93 elements (93 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1523
Raw Density6.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

69
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability69/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

40%
🗑️ 60%
Useful Content (52.3 KB)Bloat (78.6 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.5× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context88% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage64 / 73 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

62 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 60.0% · SNR: 0.67 · Signal: 13382 / Noise: 20113 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of unisender.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Unisender is a SaaS platform for email and SMS marketing, offering tools to connect with customers, boost sales, and automate communication across various channels.
Target Audience
Marketing managers, email marketers, e-commerce business owners, SaaS founders, digital marketers, and entrepreneurs in industries like retail, travel, and online education.
Pricing Model
Tiered pricing based on email volume and features, starting from a free plan with limited functionality and scaling up to paid plans with advanced automation and integrations.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackYandex.MetrikaCRM systems (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot)CMS systems
🛡️ Compliance Standards
GDPR152-F3
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unisender’s competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive feature set, including a robust email marketing platform, SMS marketing capabilities, a drag-and-drop email builder, advanced segmentation, and a focus on automation, all while maintaining a strong emphasis on data privacy and security.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Blog posts on email marketing strategiesCase studies showcasing successful email campaignsLanding page templates for lead generationGuides and tutorials on using Unisender's features
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Difficulty in segmenting email lists
• Challenges in automating email workflows
• Concerns about email deliverability and spam filtering
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-01

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2128 ms
Raw HTML Size130.8 KB
Visible Text Size52.3 KB

Performance & Speed

40/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2128 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

948
DOM nodes
131 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

81/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.unisender.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

172
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 61/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for unisender.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/unisender.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=unisender.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 109 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
61
Single-page score
+4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 109 pages · Range 0–80
Topical Cohesion
24%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
93134
Avg Bloat
29.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
24
⚠️
24 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 24 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/common/sms-rassylka/
Документация API для SMS рассылок | Unisender
pricing 80 19.7× 1028 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/contacts/exportcontacts/
Метод exportContacts | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 80 17.4× 1176 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/contacts/subscribe/
Метод subscribe | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 80 18.4× 1046 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/contacts/importcontacts/
Метод importContacts | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 80 16.3× 1226 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/createemailmessage/
Метод createEmailMessage | Интеграция с Unisender по API
pricing 80 18.8× 1025 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/sendemail/
Метод sendEmail | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 80 13.2× 1616 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/common/instructions-creating-integrations/
Инструкция по созданию API интеграций email и sms рассылок с Unisender
docs 80 20.0× 975
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/common/bulk-email/
Документация API для email-рассылок в Unisender
pricing 80 16.1× 1375 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/check-email/
Метод checkEmail | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 80 18.2× 1085 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/common/sistema-uvedomlenij-o-sobytiyah-webhooks/
Система уведомлений о событиях (Webhooks)
pricing 80 13.0× 1784 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/createcampaign/
Метод createCampaign | Интеграция с Unisender по API
pricing 80 17.9× 1087 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/contacts/getcontact/
Метод getContact
pricing 75 21.3× 897 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/templates/gettemplate/
Метод getTemplate | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 75 31.3× 573 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/sendsms/
Метод sendSms | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 75 31.5× 573 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/notes/getsubscribernotes/
Метод getSubscriberNotes
pricing 75 30.4× 594 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/statistics/getmessages/
Метод getMessages | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 75 26.3× 695 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/templates/listtemplates/
Метод listTemplates
pricing 75 25.1× 723 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/templates/gettemplates/
Метод getTemplates | Интеграция c UniSender по API
pricing 75 23.7× 772 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/messages/updateoptinemail/
Метод updateOptInEmail | Интеграция c Unisender по API
pricing 75 29.9× 596 💰 Pricing
https://www.unisender.com/ru/support/api/contacts/createlist/
Метод createList | Интеграция с Unisender по API
pricing 75 31.3× 569 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/ru/ 99 70 0% 31.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 75 0% 25.9× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 75 0% 24.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 59 0% 30.2× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 52 0% 85.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 109 pages
school.unisender.com ×103
youtube.com ×103
app.unisender.com ×103
t.me ×103
vk.com ×103
sk.ru ×67
offer.unisender.com ×35
max.ru ×33
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/unisender.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to unisender.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
unisender.com (this site) 61 79 WordPress 2.5× 1
tokk-kansai.jp 85 90 WordPress 2.5× 1 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite unisender.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to unisender.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Unisender",
  "url": "https://unisender.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://unisender.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Unisender?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Unisender does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Unisender work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Unisender."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for unisender.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
86
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →