vc.ru 41 D
🛡️ SEO 30 🤖 GEO 48 ⚡ Perf 27 🏗️ Arch 56

vc.ru — Global SEODiff Score 41/100

vc.ru
📋 Executive Audit

vc.ru operates as a Russian-language digital publication focused on business, technology, startup ecosystems, and growth models, positioning itself within the infrastructure category of online media. Its Global SEODiff Score of 39 and ACRI Grade of F indicate significant room for improvement in overall search visibility and content authority, particularly relative to benchmark performance. While the site demonstrates moderate AI Readiness (45) and Extractability (51), its retrieval robustness score of 11 reveals a critical weakness in how effectively search engines can access and interpret its content, especially under AI-driven query conditions.

The site shows notable strengths in AI accessibility, with full bot allowance for GPT, Claude, and CC bots, and no blocking meta tags, signaling strong alignment with emerging AI indexing practices. It also maintains good content integrity and moderate structural clarity, with a valid organization schema and website markup. However, foundational technical issues undermine performance: a TTFB of 2,020 ms, 536KB HTML payload, and only 9,647 bytes of useful text suggest severe content bloat. The 55.7x token bloat ratio and 30% ghost ratio indicate substantial non-essential code and orphaned or low-value pages, severely impacting crawl efficiency and user experience. Additionally, the lack of external links and undeclared sitemap hinder link equity distribution and discovery.

Architecturally, the site exhibits moderate internal linking (137 links) but lacks external references, limiting domain authority signals. The absence of a declared sitemap and missing HSTS/CSP headers further weaken technical trust. While the semantic structure score of 25 reflects poor content organization and entity coverage, the AI Trust Score of 12.2 suggests low confidence in content reliability for AI systems. To elevate performance, vc.ru must prioritize reducing HTML bloat, improving TTFB, implementing a sitemap, and strengthening external link acquisition—key steps to transform its architecture score of 50 into a competitive advantage.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
41
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (27) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (42×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 21 ACRI +1 (34→35)
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📉 Mar 20 ACRI -1 (35→34)
📈 Mar 19 ACRI +1 (34→35)
📉 Mar 19 ACRI -2 (36→34)
Does your site score higher than vc.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)30 × 0.25 = 7.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)48 × 0.40 = 19.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)27 × 0.20 = 5.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)56 × 0.15 = 8.4
Weighted sum = 7.5 + 19.2 + 5.4 + 8.4
Global SEODiff Score = 41 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
6
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #4801
+47 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

vc.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why vc.ru ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat41.6×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

30/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

97 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

272 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://vc.ru
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — vc.ru — бизнес, технологии, идеи, модели роста, стартапы
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

48/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
vc.ru
35
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 41.6x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 6/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 1 elements (1 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1045
Raw Density0.1%
💡Low structure score (6/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 1 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

36
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability36/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (11.8 KB)Bloat (477.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio41.6× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context15% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage7 / 46 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 489.6 KB, but only 11.8 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (41.6×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 15% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.6% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 3012 / Noise: 122333 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
ServerQRATOR
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2109 ms
Raw HTML Size489.6 KB
Visible Text Size11.8 KB

Performance & Speed

27/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2109 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1561
DOM nodes
490 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

56/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

133
internal links
0
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 35/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for vc.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/vc.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=vc.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 188 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
35
Single-page score
+12
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 188 pages · Range 0–60
Total Words
79220
Avg Bloat
120.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
3
⚠️
3 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 3 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://vc.ru/crypto/2757491-czb-i-minfin-razrabotali-zakonoproekt-o-legalizacii-kriptovaljuty
Законопроект о легализации крипторынка в России: что известно
legal 60 43.8× 719
https://vc.ru/invest/2759529-vladimir-potanin-o-sdelkakh-s-tinkovym-i-yandeksom
«И вот тут наступил мой звёздный час»: Владимир Потанин рассказал Forbes, как проходили сделки по покупке долей в «Тинькофф» и «Яндексе» — Инвестиции на vc.ru
other 60 49.0× 581
https://vc.ru/transport/2757523-obedineniye-samozanyatykh-predlozhilo-vydelit-voditeley-v-otdelnyy-vid-perevozok
«Объединение самозанятых» предложило выделить самозанятых водителей в отдельный вид перевозок — Транспорт на vc.ru
other 60 51.4× 559
https://vc.ru/bugs
Сломалось (@bugs) — Сообщество на vc.ru
other 58 104.1× 553
https://vc.ru/tag/products
Products: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
product 58 150.8× 514
https://vc.ru/about
О проекте — vc.ru на vc.ru
about 57 52.8× 608
https://vc.ru/services
Сервисы (@services) — Сообщество на vc.ru
product 57 150.3× 653
https://vc.ru/tag/pricing
Pricing: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
pricing 57 255.6× 604 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://vc.ru/tag/doc
Doc: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
docs 57 94.5× 643
https://vc.ru/tag/api
Api: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
docs 57 135.2× 613
https://vc.ru/tag/article
Article: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
blog 57 95.4× 639
https://vc.ru/tag/blog
Blog: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
blog 57 118.2× 663
https://vc.ru/tag/guide
Guide: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
pricing 57 251.1× 519 💰 Pricing
https://vc.ru/marketplace
Маркетплейсы (@marketplace) — Сообщество на vc.ru
integrations 57 148.0× 678
https://vc.ru/tag/articles
Articles: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
blog 57 146.1× 539
https://vc.ru/tag/tutorial
Tutorial: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
docs 57 103.0× 674
https://vc.ru/tag/help
Help: статьи и новости по теме — vc.ru
support 57 87.9× 711
https://vc.ru/offline
Офлайн (@offline) — Сообщество на vc.ru
other 57 93.5× 789
https://vc.ru/future
Будущее (@future) — Сообщество на vc.ru
other 57 124.3× 662
https://vc.ru/ai
AI (@ai) — Сообщество на vc.ru
pricing 57 127.9× 671 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/tag/ 44 50 1% 170.7× Bot Blocked
/ai/ 16 46 1% 112.0× Bot Blocked
/services/ 16 47 1% 109.5× Bot Blocked
/money/ 14 46 1% 114.7× Bot Blocked
/invest/ 11 47 1% 104.1× Bot Blocked
/tech/ 7 50 1% 110.5× Bot Blocked
/transport/ 6 51 1% 91.2× Bot Blocked
/marketplace/ 6 47 1% 115.4× Bot Blocked
/apple/ 6 45 1% 116.0× Bot Blocked
/popular/ 4 57 1% 117.0× Bot Blocked
/crypto/ 3 55 1% 92.4× Bot Blocked
/telegram/ 2 52 1% 109.8× Bot Blocked
/chatgpt/ 2 52 1% 118.5× Bot Blocked
/food/ 2 52 1% 96.3× Bot Blocked
/hr/ 2 57 1% 87.4× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/vc.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to vc.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
vc.ru (this site) 35 64 Custom / Proprietary 41.6× 1
nicebeauty.se 60 78 Custom / Proprietary 28.8× 3 Compare →
grandcasinoarena.com 60 81 Custom / Proprietary 7.1× 1 Compare →
massaget.kz 60 71 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 1 Compare →
sfakianakis.gr 60 69 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 1 Compare →
advertiserandtimes.co.uk 60 71 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite vc.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to vc.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Vc?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Vc does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Vc work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Vc."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for vc.ru:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
72
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

12.2
AI-Trust
#328
Global Rank
82%
Percentile
71
Inbound AI Links
0
Outbound AI Links
49
Avg Inbound ACRI
22%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
ratingruneta.ru 40 1.9 ← cites you
reg.ru 66 0.2 ← cites you
1c.fitness 75 0.0 ← cites you
fitness1c.ru 75 0.0 ← cites you
onclinic.ru 70 0.0 ← cites you
chatapp.online 69 0.0 ← cites you
ancor.ru 68 0.0 ← cites you
4dk.ru 67 0.0 ← cites you
evateam.ru 66 0.0 ← cites you
mne.ru 66 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →