versus.com 65 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 54 ⚡ Perf 56 🏗️ Arch 100

versus.com — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

versus.com
📊

With a solid 68/100 ACRI, versus.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 62% of sites in the Radar. In the education sector, versus.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. A ghost ratio of 30% indicates a mixed rendering strategy where core content loads server-side but interactive sections rely on JavaScript. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. With 4 JSON-LD schema blocks, the site provides explicit machine-readable metadata that enhances AI comprehension. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but AI Readiness (54) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (55×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than versus.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)54 × 0.40 = 21.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)56 × 0.20 = 11.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)100 × 0.15 = 15.0
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 21.6 + 11.2 + 15.0
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
22
Structure
avg 35
48
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.6%
Rank #6329
+38 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 38%
Score 68/100

versus.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why versus.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryeducation
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage4 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

27 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

157 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://versus.com/en
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Versus | Compare everything
  • ✓ og:description — Versus is a comparison platform with over 100 categories. Compare anything side-by-side with detailed specifications, filters, and clear data visualizations.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

54/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the education sector, melbourneschool.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
versus.com
45
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. melbourneschool.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 54.6x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 22/100 — Low
Structured Elements 10 elements (10 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words708
Raw Density1.4%
💡Low structure score (22/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 10 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks4 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

41
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability41/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (4.2 KB)Bloat (223.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage67 / 67 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 228.0 KB, but only 4.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.2% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 1069 / Noise: 57300 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of versus.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website compares wireless earbuds, providing detailed specifications and user reviews to help consumers make informed purchasing decisions.
Target Audience
Tech enthusiasts, audio consumers, and individuals seeking to compare wireless earbuds before purchasing.
Pricing Model
N/A - The site does not provide pricing information directly. It focuses on comparison and user reviews.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Comprehensive comparison data and user-generated reviews, offering a detailed and accessible alternative to manufacturer websites.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Comparison pagesTemplate-generated tables for feature comparisons
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of direct pricing information
• Reliance on user-generated content for some features (e.g., battery life, IP rating)
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1070 ms
Raw HTML Size228.0 KB
Visible Text Size4.2 KB

Performance & Speed

56/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1070 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

651
DOM nodes
228 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comdoubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

100/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://versus.com/sitemap_index.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

81
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 45/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for versus.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/versus.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=versus.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1010 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
45
Single-page score
+25
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
71
Avg across 1010 pages · Range 0–74
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
2579551
Avg Bloat
20.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-aukey-ep-t27
1 Hora AUT203 vs Aukey EP-T27: What is the difference?
other 74 20.0× 2405
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-boat-airdopes-381
1 Hora AUT203 vs boAt Airdopes 381: What is the difference?
other 74 20.0× 2544
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-anker-soundcore-life-dot-3i
1 Hora AUT203 vs Anker Soundcore Life Dot 3i: What is the difference?
other 74 19.9× 2748
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-aukey-ep-t21s-move-compact-2
1 Hora AUT203 vs Aukey EP-T21S Move Compact 2: What is the difference?
other 74 19.4× 2588
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-asus-clique-h10
1 Hora AUT203 vs Asus Clique H10: What is the difference?
other 74 20.0× 2578
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-anker-soundcore-liberty-neo-2
1 Hora AUT203 vs Anker SoundCore Liberty Neo 2: What is the difference?
other 74 19.2× 2615
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-altec-lansing-nanobuds-sport
1 Hora AUT203 vs Altec Lansing NanoBuds Sport: What is the difference?
other 74 19.9× 2670
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-baseus-encok-s10
1 Hora AUT203 vs Baseus Encok S10: What is the difference?
other 74 19.8× 2542
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-anker-soundcore-spirit
1 Hora AUT203 vs Anker SoundCore Spirit: What is the difference?
other 74 19.9× 2604
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-aukey-ep-t21-move-compact
1 Hora AUT203 vs Aukey EP-T21 Move Compact: What is the difference?
other 74 19.5× 2513
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-aukey-move-mini-s
1 Hora AUT203 vs Aukey Move Mini S: What is the difference?
other 74 19.3× 2508
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-baseus-encok-w2i
1 Hora AUT203 vs Baseus Encok W2i: What is the difference?
other 74 19.7× 2493
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-audio-technica-ath-ac5tw
1 Hora AUT203 vs Audio-Technica ATH-AC5TW: What is the difference?
other 74 19.9× 2434
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-baseus-c-mic-cm10
1 Hora AUT203 vs Baseus C-Mic CM10: What is the difference?
other 74 19.8× 2497
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-fire-boltt-fire-pods-ninja-g311
1 Hora AUT203 vs Fire-Boltt Fire Pods Ninja G311: What is the difference?
other 74 19.2× 2623
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-1more-piston-fit-bt
1 Hora AUT203 vs 1more Piston Fit BT: What is the difference?
other 74 19.5× 2665
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-altec-lansing-true-evo-sport
1 Hora AUT203 vs Altec Lansing True Evo Sport: What is the difference?
other 74 19.4× 2726
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-1hora-aut210
1 Hora AUT203 vs 1Hora AUT210: What is the difference?
pricing 74 19.9× 2385 💰 Pricing
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-boult-audio-scepter
1 Hora AUT203 vs Boult Audio Scepter: What is the difference?
other 74 19.7× 2457
https://versus.com/en/1-hora-aut203-vs-anker-soundcore-life-note-3-xr
1 Hora AUT203 vs Anker Soundcore Life Note 3 XR: What is the difference?
other 74 19.8× 2734
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/en/ 500 74 0% 19.7× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1010 pages
instagram.com ×1000
youtube.com ×1000
twitter.com ×1000
whatsapp.com ×1000
tiktok.com ×1000
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/versus.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar education Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to versus.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
versus.com (this site) 45 68 Custom / Proprietary 54.6× 4
kvpr.org 70 76 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 1 Compare →
nprillinois.org 70 76 Custom / Proprietary 4.2× 1 Compare →
openu.ac.il 70 77 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 1 Compare →
kariyer.ihu.edu.tr 70 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 0 Compare →
brabu.ac.in 70 78 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite versus.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to versus.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Versus?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Versus does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Versus work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Versus."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for versus.com:

Current Score
68
Projected Score
76
Improvement
+8 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →