wavespeed.ai 50 D
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 50 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 62

wavespeed.ai — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

wavespeed.ai
📊

wavespeed.ai currently sits at 62/100 on the ACRI scale, an average result that suggests several quick wins remain untapped. Compared to other developer sites (avg score: 57), wavespeed.ai performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (46) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (194×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 9 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than wavespeed.ai?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)50 × 0.40 = 20.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)62 × 0.15 = 9.3
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 20.0 + 9.4 + 9.3
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 8%
Rank #78426
+42 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 49%
Score 62/100

wavespeed.ai punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why wavespeed.ai ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
Industrydeveloper
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

78 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

157 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 12
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://wavespeed.ai/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Ultimate Platform for Accelerating AI Image and Video Generation - WaveSpeedAI
  • ✓ og:description — WaveSpeedAI home – explore the platform that speeds up image, video and audio generation so you can build AI features, creative tools and workflows faster.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

50/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
wavespeed.ai
31
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1078
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

25
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability25/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (9.8 KB)Bloat (1889.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context5% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage6 / 133 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1899.0 KB, but only 9.8 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 5% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.5% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 2502 / Noise: 483631 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of wavespeed.ai and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
WaveSpeedAI provides an AI-powered platform for generating and editing images and videos, focusing on advanced techniques like text-to-image, image-to-video, and model-based workflows.
Target Audience
AI developers, content creators, marketers, designers, and anyone seeking advanced image and video generation capabilities.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
GoogleAdobeCanvaClipdropStability AITensorFlowPython
🏆 Competitive Moat
WaveSpeedAI’s competitive advantage lies in its integration of advanced AI models like Nano Banana 2 and its comprehensive suite of tools for managing AI pipelines and workflows, including negative prompts and reference packs.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
integration directory pagestemplate comparison pagestutorial pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-04

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time912 ms
Raw HTML Size1899.0 KB
Visible Text Size9.8 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

912 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1543
DOM nodes
1899 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

62/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://wavespeed.ai/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

124
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 31/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for wavespeed.ai
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/wavespeed.ai" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=wavespeed.ai" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 58 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
31
Single-page score
+22
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
54
Avg across 58 pages · Range 0–72
Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
238235
Avg Bloat
31.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
51
⚠️
51 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 51 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://wavespeed.ai/blog
WaveSpeedAI Blog | WaveSpeedAI Blog
pricing 72 34.7× 833 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/google/google-nano-banana-pro-text-to-image-ultra
Google Nano Banana Pro Text To Image Ultra API - Best Google Nano Banana Pro Text To Image Ultra API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 64 24.2× 4987 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/inworld/inworld-inworld-1.5-mini-text-to-speech
Inworld Inworld 1.5 Mini Text To Speech API - Best Inworld Inworld 1.5 Mini Text To Speech API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 64 23.5× 5480 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/inworld/inworld-inworld-1.5-max-text-to-speech
Inworld Inworld 1.5 Max Text To Speech API - Best Inworld Inworld 1.5 Max Text To Speech API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 64 23.4× 5490 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/google/google-nano-banana-pro-text-to-image-multi
Google Nano Banana Pro Text To Image Multi API - Best Google Nano Banana Pro Text To Image Multi API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 64 24.2× 4991 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/wavespeed-ai/qwen-image-layered
Qwen Image Layered API - Best Qwen Image Layered API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.9× 4642 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/wavespeed-ai/ai-twerk
Ai Twerk API - Best Ai Twerk API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 26.6× 4471 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/bytedance/bytedance-seedream-v5.0-lite-sequential
Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Sequential API - Best Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Sequential API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.8× 4891 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/bytedance/bytedance-seedream-v5.0-lite-edit-sequential
Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Edit Sequential API - Best Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Edit Sequential API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.4× 4983 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/wavespeed-ai/flux-2-max-edit
Flux 2 Max Edit API - Best Flux 2 Max Edit API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.8× 4889 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/bytedance/bytedance-seedream-v5.0-lite-edit
Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Edit API - Best Bytedance Seedream V5.0 Lite Edit API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.3× 4772 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/kwaivgi/kwaivgi-kling-video-o3-std-image-to-video
Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Std Image To Video API - Best Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Std Image To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.1× 4846 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/kwaivgi/kwaivgi-kling-video-o3-pro-text-to-video
Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Text To Video API - Best Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Text To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.1× 4835 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/wavespeed-ai/ai-kissing
Ai Kissing API - Best Ai Kissing API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 26.3× 4527 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/kwaivgi/kwaivgi-kling-video-o3-pro-reference-to-video
Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Reference To Video API - Best Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Reference To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.7× 4949 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/kwaivgi/kwaivgi-kling-video-o3-pro-image-to-video
Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Image To Video API - Best Kwaivgi Kling Video O3 Pro Image To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.4× 4773 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/google/google-nano-banana-2-text-to-image
Google Nano Banana 2 Text To Image API - Best Google Nano Banana 2 Text To Image API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.9× 4856 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/kwaivgi/kwaivgi-kling-v3.0-std-text-to-video
Kwaivgi Kling V3.0 Std Text To Video API - Best Kwaivgi Kling V3.0 Std Text To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 24.9× 4884 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/vidu/vidu-q3-image-to-video-pro
Vidu Q3 Image To Video Pro API - Best Vidu Q3 Image To Video Pro API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.0× 4876 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://wavespeed.ai/docs/docs-api/vidu/vidu-q3-turbo-image-to-video
Vidu Q3 Turbo Image To Video API - Best Vidu Q3 Turbo Image To Video API Pricing & Speed - WaveSpeedAI
pricing 61 25.0× 4874 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 58 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 49 61 1% 25.1× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 72 0% 34.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 42 1% 580.8× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 58 pages
discord.com ×51
status.wavespeed.ai ×2
github.com ×2
x.com ×2
meigen-ai.github.io ×1
discord.gg ×1
linkedin.com ×1
youtube.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/wavespeed.ai

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to wavespeed.ai. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
wavespeed.ai (this site) 31 62 Next.js 194.3× 0
soundbetter.com 56 75 Next.js 37.8× 0 Compare →
icomedias.com 56 71 Next.js 56.9× 1 Compare →
samsonite.com.pe 56 81 Next.js 173.0× 1 Compare →
openpanel.dev 56 82 Next.js 36.9× 1 Compare →
ovh.de 56 66 Next.js 14.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite wavespeed.ai when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to wavespeed.ai. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Wavespeed",
  "url": "https://wavespeed.ai",
  "logo": "https://wavespeed.ai/favicon.ico?v=2",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Wavespeed",
  "url": "https://wavespeed.ai",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://wavespeed.ai/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Wavespeed?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Wavespeed does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Wavespeed work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Wavespeed."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for wavespeed.ai:

Current Score
62
Projected Score
80
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →