whatpulse.org 58 D
🛡️ SEO 35 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 47 🏗️ Arch 68

whatpulse.org — Global SEODiff Score 58/100

whatpulse.org
📊

whatpulse.org shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 65/100, outperforming 55% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, whatpulse.org outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The 6.3× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

58
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (35) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 24 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -1 (47→46)
📈 Mar 12 ACRI +1 (46→47)
Does your site score higher than whatpulse.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)35 × 0.25 = 8.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)47 × 0.20 = 9.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)68 × 0.15 = 10.2
Weighted sum = 8.8 + 30.0 + 9.4 + 10.2
Global SEODiff Score = 58 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
27
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 13%
Rank #133809
+32 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 45%
Score 65/100

whatpulse.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why whatpulse.org ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat6.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

35/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

114 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

167 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 2
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://whatpulse.org
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — WhatPulse - How do you actually spend your time on your computer? | WhatPulse
  • ✓ og:description — Measure your computer usage with WhatPulse. Track application usage, keystrokes, mouse clicks, network and more. Join over 500,000 users worldwide and discover your...
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
whatpulse.org
46
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 27/100 — Low
Structured Elements 38 elements (38 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1781
Raw Density2.1%
💡Low structure score (27/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 38 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

15%
🗑️ 85%
Useful Content (35.5 KB)Bloat (187.4 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context93% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage25 / 27 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 84.1% · SNR: 0.19 · Signal: 9094 / Noise: 47969 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of whatpulse.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
WhatPulse tracks computer usage, providing insights and productivity recommendations.
Target Audience
Tech enthusiasts, productivity seekers, data analysts
Pricing Model
Freemium – basic features are free, premium features require a subscription.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unique application usage tracking and global reporting capabilities.
📊 Content Depth
5/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of explicit pricing information
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-07

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1081 ms
Raw HTML Size222.9 KB
Visible Text Size35.5 KB

Performance & Speed

47/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1081 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1232
DOM nodes
223 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, private,private
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

68/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

55
internal links
11
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 46/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for whatpulse.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/whatpulse.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=whatpulse.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
46
Single-page score
-24
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
23
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–90
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 46, but internal pages average only 23 — a -24-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1315
Avg Bloat
20.8×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://whatpulse.org/blog
Blog | WhatPulse Blog
pricing 90 6.6× 867 💰 Pricing
https://whatpulse.org/about
About Us | WhatPulse: Track and analyze your productivity
pricing 54 42.2× 265 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://whatpulse.org/contact
Contact Us | WhatPulse: Track and analyze your productivity
pricing 44 135.8× 74 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://whatpulse.org/docs
WhatPulse Help Center
docs 39 23.4× 109
https://whatpulse.org/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://whatpulse.org/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://whatpulse.org/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://whatpulse.org/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://whatpulse.org/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://whatpulse.org/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 1 54 0% 42.2× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 39 0% 23.4× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 90 0% 6.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 44 0% 135.8× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
twitter.com ×3
facebook.com ×3
bsky.app ×2
mutedeck.com ×2
discord.gg ×2
whatpulse.pro ×2
instagram.com ×2
x.com ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/whatpulse.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to whatpulse.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
whatpulse.org (this site) 46 65 Custom / Proprietary 6.3× 1
g.pl 71 73 Custom / Proprietary 5.1× 0 Compare →
southwestmedical.com 71 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 1 Compare →
rikshem.se 71 84 Custom / Proprietary 2.8× 1 Compare →
cabletiesandmore.com 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 2.0× 1 Compare →
taiwan.vivinavi.com 71 81 Custom / Proprietary 3.3× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite whatpulse.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to whatpulse.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Whatpulse",
  "url": "https://whatpulse.org",
  "logo": "https://whatpulse.org/assets/images/favicon/favicon-96x96.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Whatpulse",
  "url": "https://whatpulse.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://whatpulse.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Whatpulse?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Whatpulse does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Whatpulse work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Whatpulse."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for whatpulse.org:

Current Score
65
Projected Score
81
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →