workingwithmen.org 69 C
🛡️ SEO 67 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 93

workingwithmen.org — Global SEODiff Score 69/100

workingwithmen.org
📊

workingwithmen.org achieves a 77/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), workingwithmen.org performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.9×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. The presence of 6 structured data blocks ensures search engines and AI agents can accurately classify and extract entities from the page. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

69
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (36) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Fix title tag length → +3 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📈 Mar 11 ACRI +1 (63→64)
Does your site score higher than workingwithmen.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)67 × 0.25 = 16.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 16.8 + 31.2 + 7.2 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 69 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
26
Structure
avg 35
52
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 12%
Rank #123657
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

workingwithmen.org has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why workingwithmen.org ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage6 blocks
Token bloat3.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

67/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

177 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://matysmiami.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → vi
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Xoilac TV - Xem bóng đá Xoilac365 hôm nay, link XoilacTV HD mượt
  • ✓ og:description — Xoilac TV (XoilacTV) - Trực tiếp bóng đá hôm nay với link XoilacTV HD không giật lag. Xem miễn phí tại Xoilac365 với bình luận tiếng Việt hấp dẫn.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
workingwithmen.org
64
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 26/100 — Low
Structured Elements 112 elements (108 lists, 4 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words5404
Raw Density2.1%
💡Low structure score (26/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 108 list items, 4 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks6 blocks

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
✅ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

66
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability66/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (70/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (315.3 KB)Bloat (911.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context80% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage774 / 973 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

27 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 74.3% · SNR: 0.35 · Signal: 80717 / Noise: 233417 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of workingwithmen.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This website provides live streaming links for a vast range of sports, including football (various leagues), basketball, tennis, and esports,
Target Audience
Sports fans, casual viewers, and individuals seeking access to live sports broadcasts globally.
Pricing Model
The website appears to be ad-supported and potentially offers premium subscriptions for ad-free viewing or enhanced features (though this is not explicitly stated).
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive sports coverage and a large user base, combined with a constantly updated database of live streaming links, creating a significant network effect.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Extensive use of keywords related to sports leagues and competitions.Template-like listing of sports events with dates and times.Multiple pages dedicated to specific leagues and competitions.
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of a clear monetization strategy beyond advertising.
• Potential for inaccurate or outdated links due to reliance on external streaming sources.
• Limited user interface and functionality beyond a simple list of links.
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-06

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time566 ms
Raw HTML Size1227.1 KB
Visible Text Size315.3 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

566 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

9371
DOM nodes
1227 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, s-maxage=14000, max-age=3
  • ✓ CDN cache status → HIT
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
facebook.netgoogletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://matysmiami.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

116
internal links
111
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → vi
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 64/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for workingwithmen.org
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/workingwithmen.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=workingwithmen.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
64
Single-page score
+2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
66
Avg across 10 pages · Range 66–66
Total Words
66872
Avg Bloat
44.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://workingwithmen.org/pricing
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/about
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/features
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/products
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/blog
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/docs
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/case-studies
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/contact
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6680 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/integrations
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6689 💰 Pricing
https://workingwithmen.org/faq
Xoilac365 Trực tiếp bóng đá - Link xem Xoilac TV full HD
pricing 66 44.9× 6680 💰 Pricing
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/features/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/integrations/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 66 1% 44.9× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
15.235.211.177 ×10
scoop.it ×10
juliesongink.com ×10
instagram.com ×10
trello.com ×10
t.me ×10
twitch.tv ×10
youtube.com ×10
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/workingwithmen.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to workingwithmen.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
workingwithmen.org (this site) 64 77 WordPress 3.9× 6
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
profitserver.ru 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite workingwithmen.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →