zan.top 62 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 61 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 90

zan.top — Global SEODiff Score 62/100

zan.top
📊

With a solid 71/100 ACRI, zan.top is well-positioned for AI search — better than 70% of sites in the Radar. In the developer sector, zan.top outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

62
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (85×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than zan.top?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)61 × 0.40 = 24.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)90 × 0.15 = 13.5
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 24.4 + 11.8 + 13.5
Global SEODiff Score = 62 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
58
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 5%
Rank #49014
+26 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 30%
Score 71/100

zan.top punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why zan.top ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrydeveloper
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

61 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

141 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 7
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — ZAN: One of the Most Reliable Gateway to Empowering Web3 Apps
  • ✓ og:description — Provides Node RPC, zk acceleration, eKYC, contract audits, and testnet faucets, reducing costs and enhancing security for DApps and projects.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

61/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the developer sector, hikkoshizamurai.jp (ACRI: 88) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
zan.top
49
Your ACRI Score
88
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. hikkoshizamurai.jp has schema coverage of 5 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 58/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 50 elements (50 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words488
Raw Density10.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

43
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability43/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (65/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (3.2 KB)Bloat (271.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context82% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage46 / 56 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 274.8 KB, but only 3.2 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.8% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 829 / Noise: 69515 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of zan.top and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
A collaborative project management tool designed for remote teams, offering sprint planning, resource allocation, and automated task assignment to improve team efficiency and productivity.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and project managers working in agile environments.
Pricing Model
Tiered subscription model: Free plan with limited features, Standard plan ($12/user/month), and Pro plan ($25/user/month) with advanced capabilities.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning with real-time resource optimization and predictive workload analysis, providing a significant advantage over traditional project management tools.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesSprint planning guide
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Limited reporting and analytics
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-02

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time989 ms
Raw HTML Size274.8 KB
Visible Text Size3.2 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

989 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

870
DOM nodes
275 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

90/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://zan.top/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

93
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for zan.top
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/zan.top" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=zan.top" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 67 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 67 pages · Range 33–57
Topical Cohesion
10%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
29963
Avg Bloat
236.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://zan.top/pricing pricing 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/about about 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/products product 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/features product 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/blog blog 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/docs docs 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/case-studies social-proof 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/contact support 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/faq support 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/integrations integrations 57 9.4× 107
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/From-Manus-and-MCP%3A-The-Cross-Boundary-Exploration-of-AI-Agents-in-Web3-20250325
From Manus and MCP: The Cross-Boundary Exploration of AI Agents in Web3 - ZAN
pricing 56 29.8× 1748 💰 Pricing
https://zan.top/web3/cn/resources/blog/%E9%A2%84%E8%A8%80%E6%9C%BA%E8%AF%A6%E8%A7%A3%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E4%B9%8BChainlink%EF%BC%88%E4%B8%8A%EF%BC%89-20241231
预言机详解系列之Chainlink(上) - ZAN
blog 56 77.9× 731
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/The-Web3-Wave-Has-Arrived%3A-From-Intent-Trading-to-DeFAI-20250213
The Web3 Wave Has Arrived: From Intent Trading to DeFAI - ZAN
pricing 56 30.7× 1841 💰 Pricing
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/Strengthen-Your-DApp-with-SIWE-20241230
Strengthen Your DApp with SIWE - ZAN
blog 56 32.1× 1688
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/LETUS%3A-A-Log-Structured-Efficient-Trusted-Universal-Blockchain-Storage-20240923
LETUS: A Log-Structured Efficient Trusted Universal Blockchain Storage - ZAN
blog 56 20.5× 2913
https://zan.top/web3/hk/resources/blog/%E4%BB%8E-Manus-%E5%92%8C-MCP-%E8%81%8A%E8%B5%B7%EF%BC%9AAI-Agent-%E7%9A%84-Web3-%E8%B7%A8%E7%95%8C%E6%8E%A2%E7%B4%A2-20250325
从 Manus 和 MCP 聊起:AI Agent 的 Web3 跨界探索 - ZAN
pricing 53 108.5× 503 💰 Pricing
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/The-Sword-of-Damocles-Over-Blockchain%3A-Understanding-the-Impact-of-Google%E2%80%99s-New-Quantum-Chip-on-Blockchain-20241216
The Sword of Damocles Over Blockchain: Understanding the Impact of Google’s New Quantum Chip on Blockchain - ZAN
blog 53 37.3× 1377
https://zan.top/web3/cn/resources/blog/%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8-SIWE-%E8%AE%A9%E4%BD%A0%E7%9A%84-Dapp-%E6%9B%B4%E5%8A%A0%E5%BC%BA%E5%A4%A7-20241230
使用 SIWE 让你的 Dapp 更加强大 - ZAN
blog 53 74.7× 727
https://zan.top/web3/resources/blog/Web3-Beginner-Series%3ASolana-Ecosystem-AMM-Research-20250620
Web3 Beginner Series:Solana Ecosystem AMM Research - ZAN
blog 53 35.5× 1470
https://zan.top/web3/cn/resources/blog/%E4%BB%8E-Manus-%E5%92%8C-MCP-%E8%81%8A%E8%B5%B7%EF%BC%9AAI-Agent-%E7%9A%84-Web3-%E8%B7%A8%E7%95%8C%E6%8E%A2%E7%B4%A2-20250325
从 Manus 和 MCP 聊起:AI Agent 的 Web3 跨界探索 - ZAN
pricing 53 108.5× 502 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 67 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/web3/ 57 41 1% 276.4× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 57 0% 9.4× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/zan.top

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar developer Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to zan.top. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
zan.top (this site) 49 71 Custom / Proprietary 84.9× 1
silverjeans.com 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
giroportal.com.br 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
kariera.zoznam.sk 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.4× 0 Compare →
get.treasuredata.com 74 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 3 Compare →
sole.ro 74 83 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 33 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite zan.top when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to zan.top. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Zan",
  "url": "https://zan.top",
  "logo": "https://mdn.alipayobjects.com/huamei_hsbbrh/afts/img/A*yTNyQ7CaIp4AAAAAAAAAAAAADiOMAQ/original",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Zan?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Zan does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Zan work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Zan."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for zan.top:

Current Score
71
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →