zen-browser.app 68 C
🛡️ SEO 53 🤖 GEO 68 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 83

zen-browser.app — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

zen-browser.app
📊

zen-browser.app shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 73/100, outperforming 75% of indexed domains. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places zen-browser.app above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 17.1× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than zen-browser.app?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)53 × 0.25 = 13.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)68 × 0.40 = 27.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)83 × 0.15 = 12.4
Weighted sum = 13.2 + 27.2 + 14.8 + 12.4
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
54
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
75
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #63902
+19 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 25%
Score 73/100

zen-browser.app punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why zen-browser.app ranks here

Tech stackCloudflare Pages
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat17.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

53/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

11 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

64 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 5
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Zen Browser
  • ✓ og:description — Beautifully designed, privacy-focused, and packed with features.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

68/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
zen-browser.app
49
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 54/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 33 elements (33 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words380
Raw Density8.7%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

47
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability47/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (40/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

5%
🗑️ 95%
Useful Content (3.2 KB)Bloat (51.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio17.1× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage4 / 4 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 94.1% · SNR: 0.06 · Signal: 814 / Noise: 13094 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of zen-browser.app and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Zen Browser is a free, open-source browser focused on user privacy and a streamlined browsing experience.
Target Audience
Web users, privacy advocates, developers
Pricing Model
Free, open-source
🏆 Competitive Moat
Open-source nature and commitment to user privacy and a clean browsing experience.
📊 Content Depth
3/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score75/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time575 ms
Raw HTML Size54.3 KB
Visible Text Size3.2 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

575 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

353
DOM nodes
54 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

83/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://zen-browser.app/sitemap-0.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

38
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 49/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for zen-browser.app
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/zen-browser.app" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=zen-browser.app" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 68 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
49
Single-page score
-25
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
24
Avg across 68 pages · Range 0–77
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 49, but internal pages average only 24 — a -25-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
19%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
21008
Avg Bloat
1033.6×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/
リリースノート - Zen
docs 77 6.3× 20225
https://zen-browser.app/about
About Zen
about 49 33.4× 219
https://zen-browser.app/about/
About Zen
about 49 33.4× 219
https://zen-browser.app/ja/about/
Zenについて
about 39 105.6× 70
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.1-a.9/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.1-a.16/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.8× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.1-a.6/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.30/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.8× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.1-a.10/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.8× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.7.4b/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.4× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.8/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.3/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.1/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.2/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.4/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.5/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.13/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.8× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.6/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.7/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.7× 5
https://zen-browser.app/ja/release-notes/1.0.0-a.29/
リリースノート
docs 26 1274.8× 5
Showing 20 of 68 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/ja/ 57 27 0% 1231.9× High JS Bloat
/about/ 2 49 0% 33.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 68 pages
github.com ×59
docs.zen-browser.app ×59
status.zen-browser.app ×59
discord.gg ×59
floss.social ×59
bsky.app ×59
reddit.com ×59
x.com ×59
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/zen-browser.app

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to zen-browser.app. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
zen-browser.app (this site) 49 73 Cloudflare Pages 17.1× 1
pornkino.org 74 85 Cloudflare Pages 5.5× 1 Compare →
8maple.st 74 81 Cloudflare Pages 4.4× 1 Compare →
alibris.com 74 80 Cloudflare Pages 3.4× 1 Compare →
koreadaily.com 74 82 Cloudflare Pages 3.1× 1 Compare →
aeroproduct.net 74 82 Cloudflare Pages 3.3× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite zen-browser.app when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to zen-browser.app. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Zen-browser",
  "url": "https://zen-browser.app",
  "logo": "https://zen-browser.app/favicon.svg",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 5% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Zen-browser?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Zen-browser does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Zen-browser work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Zen-browser."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for zen-browser.app:

Current Score
73
Projected Score
87
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →