aftonbladet.se 50 D
🛡️ SEO 22 🤖 GEO 56 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 95

aftonbladet.se — Global SEODiff Score 50/100

aftonbladet.se
📊

aftonbladet.se shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 70/100, outperforming 67% of indexed domains. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), aftonbladet.se performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

50
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (22) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (72×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 20 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
📉 Mar 20 ACRI -1 (41→40)
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
📈 Mar 19 ACRI +1 (40→41)
📉 Mar 19 ACRI -1 (41→40)
Does your site score higher than aftonbladet.se?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)22 × 0.25 = 5.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)56 × 0.40 = 22.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)95 × 0.15 = 14.2
Weighted sum = 5.5 + 22.4 + 7.8 + 14.2
Global SEODiff Score = 50 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
34
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1115
+33 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 33%
Score 70/100

aftonbladet.se punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why aftonbladet.se ranks here

Tech stackAstro
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

22/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

11 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

131 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.aftonbladet.se
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Aftonbladet
  • ✓ og:description — Aftonbladet är Sveriges primära och mest engagerande nyhetskälla. Genom journalistiken värnar vi sanningen och granskar makten.
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

56/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
aftonbladet.se
40
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 34/100 — Low
Structured Elements 20 elements (20 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words590
Raw Density3.4%
💡Low structure score (34/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 20 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

37
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability37/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (6.0 KB)Bloat (425.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context74% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage26 / 35 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 431.2 KB, but only 6.0 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.6% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 1542 / Noise: 108853 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of aftonbladet.se and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No meta descriptions
• Thin content on category pages
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkAstro
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1722 ms
Raw HTML Size431.2 KB
Visible Text Size6.0 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1722 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1598
DOM nodes
431 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

95/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.aftonbladet.se/sitemaps/files/articles-48hrs.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

125
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 40/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for aftonbladet.se
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/aftonbladet.se" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=aftonbladet.se" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 995 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
40
Single-page score
+7
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
47
Avg across 995 pages · Range 0–64
Topical Cohesion
9%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
264097
Avg Bloat
509.4×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/fotboll/a/jPa300/sandlin-svensk-fotbolls-stoltaste-ogonblick
<b>Sandlin:</b> Svensk fotbolls stoltaste ögonblick
pricing 64 119.4× 809 💰 Pricing
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/Mg1vkr/dina-pojkar-fostras-till-forlorare
Dina pojkar fostras till förlorare
other 64 79.9× 1069
https://www.aftonbladet.se/halsa/a/A2LRXr/somnsvarigheter-kan-bero--pa-ditt-sovrum
Sömnsvårigheter kan bero – på ditt sovrum
other 64 157.8× 555
https://www.aftonbladet.se/halsa/a/a27GK7/somna-snabbt--sa-lyckas-du
Somna snabbt – så lyckas du!
pricing 64 152.5× 526 💰 Pricing
https://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/a/Qlyra4/alla-laser-markisen-pa-sitt-eget-satt
Alla läser markisen på sitt eget sätt
other 64 157.0× 531
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/RxynBA/psykiatrin-har-gjort-familjen-illa-genom-att-tanka-och-tala-elakt-om-den
Psykiatrin har gjort familjen illa, genom att tänka och tala elakt om den
other 64 111.2× 713
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/BJ34B7/jag-kan-nastan-vara-hur-grov-som-helst
Jag kan nästan vara hur grov som helst
other 64 117.0× 663
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/zLrwXK/femariga-pojkar-mar-samst-vid-skilsmassa
Femåriga pojkar mår sämst vid skilsmässa
other 64 116.6× 663
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/WLqyyg/darfor-har-du-bogskrack
Därför har du bögskräck
other 64 137.4× 552
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/e1Pvvy/jag-fick-en-hjarnpropp-av-stressen
Jag fick en hjärnpropp av stressen
pricing 64 141.5× 544 💰 Pricing
https://www.aftonbladet.se/halsa/a/WLqy3Q/ensamma-mamman-fangade-dromprinsen
Ensamma mamman fångade drömprinsen
other 64 126.7× 608
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/p6pOOE/efterlyses-sport-bocker-om-tjejer
Efterlyses: sport- <br />böcker om tjejer
other 64 123.9× 608
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/On31q1/unga-killar-koar-for-att-fa-fraga-om-sex
Unga killar köar för att få fråga om sex
other 64 119.3× 647
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/vmOdXL/lat-grabben-zzzova-ut
Låt grabben zzzova ut
pricing 64 144.5× 531 💰 Pricing
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/qnR8EE/terri-erikssons-dagbok
Terri Erikssons dagbok
pricing 64 102.4× 770 💰 Pricing
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/0E4zO6/atstorningar-kan-ligga-i-generna
Ätstörningar kan ligga i generna
other 64 98.9× 784
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/zLrwz5/i-vanliga-fall-hade-jag-nog-lagt-benen-pa-ryggen
I vanliga fall hade jag nog lagt benen på ryggen
other 64 153.1× 513
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/rLW4Om/terri-erikssons-dagbok
Terri Erikssons dagbok
other 64 132.6× 584
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/QlxWXx/terri-erikssons-dagbok
Terri Erikssons dagbok
other 64 107.2× 731
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/J1EwG8/spring-inte-in-i-vaggen
Spring inte in i väggen
other 64 148.3× 517
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/nojesbladet/ 250 49 1% 490.6× Bot Blocked
/relationer/ 172 58 0% 179.5× High JS Bloat
/halsa/ 70 61 0% 160.1× High JS Bloat
/nyheter/ 3 51 1% 337.1× Bot Blocked
/teknik/ 2 49 0% 572.4× High JS Bloat
/sportbladet/ 2 59 0% 218.3× High JS Bloat
/kultur/ 1 64 0% 157.0× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 995 pages
tv.aftonbladet.se ×985
tycktill.aftonbladet.se ×5
efturk.com ×2
eatingdis.com ×2
wellness.se ×1
malservice.aftonbladet.se ×1
tv.nu ×1
se.sonispherefestival.net ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/aftonbladet.se

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to aftonbladet.se. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
aftonbladet.se (this site) 40 70 Astro 71.6× 1
snaggedandbagged.com 65 82 Next.js 8.7× 1 Compare →
national-preservation.com 65 73 Express 5.2× 1 Compare →
messe-ticket.de 65 80 WordPress 8.2× 1 Compare →
electrochem.org 65 82 WordPress 14.1× 1 Compare →
rahepaydar.ir 65 76 WordPress 10.9× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite aftonbladet.se when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 985 PAGES
40%
Homepage Ghost
55%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
118%
Homepage Bloat
515%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
40%
1 pg · ACRI 64
Orphan
55%
984 pg · ACRI 47
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
60% https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/3j4BBX/haller-inte-lange orphan
60% https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/xR8JJl/katastofalt orphan
60% https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/e1Ez7l/trakigt-i-langden orphan
60% https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/ngWLLa/kul-en-stund orphan
60% https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/vm5kl4/bara-en-kopia orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

985 PAGES
84.9%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
984
Orphan Pages [?]
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
984 disconnected
11%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Topical Drift
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/6nkM7z/dagis-fostrar-man-utan-sprak https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/J1Ew8m/manga-av-sveriges-larare-bryter-mot-lagen https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/l1zm5A/dan-44-ibland-ar-jag-radd-for-att-det-jag-soker-ar-en-utopi https://www.aftonbladet.se/halsa/a/J1EwAm/vi-har-kvar-kanslan-av-gemenskap https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/ka3PjX/karlek-ar-att-blotta-sig-till-100-procent
⚠️
984 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page manga av sveriges larare bryter mot lagen, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page dagis fostrar man utan sprak. (Semantic Match: 72%)
📥 Orphan: https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/J1Ew8m/manga-av-sveriges-larare-bryter-mot-lagen
🔗 Donor: https://www.aftonbladet.se/relationer/a/6nkM7z/dagis-fostrar-man-utan-sprak (PR: 0.8502)
Get the full link injection plan for all 984 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.85 indicates significant equity concentration — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while others receive very little link authority. AI crawlers may deprioritize pages with low internal link signals.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

10 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 985 crawled pages.

ett, regiss, world
41 2 pgs (10%)
dels, dra, genomarbetade
51 2 pgs (10%)
ngder, resident, dsfall
41 2 pgs (10%)
regiss, hand, inte
41 2 pgs (10%)
actionsekvenser, alla, designade
41 2 pgs (10%)
riktigt, sexikonen, heroiske
51 2 pgs (10%)
allra, spelet, ventyret
41 2 pgs (10%)
stils, attle, ett
41 2 pgs (10%)
med, pedagogiskt, blizzard
41 2 pgs (10%)
allra, blizzard, tom
41 2 pgs (10%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

DEEP 914 TOPICS
914
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
63
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Deep
Contextual Depth
>50 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 ett, regiss, world 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/7ldPBV/bra-ide-men-det-haller-inte
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/vm5knX/bra-ide-men-det-haller-inte
🟢 dels, dra, genomarbetade 100% avg similarity · ACRI 51–51
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/jPznbz/vilken-deckare
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/KvpK15/vilken-deckare
🟢 ngder, resident, dsfall 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/Xw6OAb/lek-fotbollsmanager-i-nagot-annat-spel
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/xR4zEG/lek-fotbollsmanager-i-nagot-annat-spel
🟢 regiss, hand, inte 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/wEOd3L/handskboll
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/1kOv6J/handskboll
🟢 actionsekvenser, alla, designade 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/BJjrMG/storyn-raddar-trean
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/ddnJ7z/storyn-raddar-trean
🟢 riktigt, sexikonen, heroiske 100% avg similarity · ACRI 51–51
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/P3yLm6/charmiga-leksaker
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/WLqydQ/charmiga-leksaker
🟢 allra, spelet, ventyret 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/A2LRpM/ett-riktigt-bra-barnspel
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/0EGv3G/ett-riktigt-bra-barnspel
🟢 stils, attle, ett 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/VR1rp6/stilsaker-men-svarstyrd-action
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/ngwrlL/stilsaker-men-svarstyrd-action
🟢 med, pedagogiskt, blizzard 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/6nkMvO/upptacksfard-pa-bondgard
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/zLrw35/upptacksfard-pa-bondgard
🟢 allra, blizzard, tom 100% avg similarity · ACRI 41–41
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/oRWMe7/somna-i-bibblan-en-gaspning
  • https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/jPa3gL/somna-i-bibblan-en-gaspning
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 63 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

6 MISSING 0% COVERAGE
🚨
Missing Core Entity — Critical
aftonbladet.se has zero JSON-LD entities declared. AI models cannot identify your brand, product, or organization in their knowledge graph. This means:
  • AI search engines will not attribute content to your brand
  • No rich snippets or knowledge panels will be generated
  • Competitor entities will fill the gap in AI responses
Fix: Add Organization or Brand JSON-LD to your homepage.
⚠️ 6 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go SSO SAML REST Rust Okta
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 0 declared vs 10 extracted — 0% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

41
Homepage ACRI
41
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
60%
Inner Avg Ghost
8
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
41 60% other https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/a27GJ4/for-lite-variation
41 60% other https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/A2LRr3/action-till-max
41 60% pricing https://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/spela/a/oRWMEK/ga-med-i-maffian
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 10/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

1 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

15
Total Links
1
Unique Domains
1.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
tv.aftonbladet.se
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 0.0

AI trust scores for the domains aftonbladet.se links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to aftonbladet.se. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Aftonbladet",
  "url": "https://aftonbladet.se",
  "logo": "https://www.aftonbladet.se/web-assets/favicon-de78e6d8/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Aftonbladet",
  "url": "https://aftonbladet.se",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://aftonbladet.se/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Aftonbladet?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Aftonbladet does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Aftonbladet work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Aftonbladet."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for aftonbladet.se:

Current Score
70
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →