archives.gov 65 C
🛡️ SEO 14 🤖 GEO 80 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 93

archives.gov — Global SEODiff Score 65/100

archives.gov
📊

With a solid 78/100 ACRI, archives.gov is well-positioned for AI search — better than 88% of sites in the Radar. In the government sector, archives.gov outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. The 7.3× token bloat ratio falls within the normal range, though there is room to trim navigation, footer, and script overhead. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

65
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (14) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 4 snapshots
Mar 4 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 4 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than archives.gov?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)14 × 0.25 = 3.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)80 × 0.40 = 32.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 3.5 + 32.0 + 16.0 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 65 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
76
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #2776
+12 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

archives.gov shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why archives.gov ranks here

Tech stackDrupal
Industrygovernment
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat7.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

14/100 25 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

📝 Title Tag

24 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

0 chars
Missing

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 13
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — National Archives
  • ✓ og:description — National Archives and Records Administration
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

80/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the government sector, gep.com (ACRI: 83) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
archives.gov
56
Your ACRI Score
83
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. gep.com has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses Drupal. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 76/100 — Good
Structured Elements 60 elements (60 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words347
Raw Density17.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

62
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability62/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

13%
🗑️ 87%
Useful Content (3.7 KB)Bloat (23.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio7.3× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context100% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 2 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 86.3% · SNR: 0.16 · Signal: 953 / Noise: 6022 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of archives.gov and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Target Audience
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🏆 Competitive Moat
SEMANTIC VOID
📊 Content Depth
1/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkDrupal
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time547 ms
Raw HTML Size27.2 KB
Visible Text Size3.7 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

547 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

315
DOM nodes
27 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=60, s-maxage=38948
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.archives.gov/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

71
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for archives.gov
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/archives.gov" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=archives.gov" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1009 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
+15
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
71
Avg across 1009 pages · Range 0–95
Topical Cohesion
6%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1896197
Avg Bloat
16.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
27
⚠️
27 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 27 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archival-arrangement.html
Archives and Records Management Resources | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 9008 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-04.html
Guide to House Records: Chapter 4 | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 14706 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-07.html
Guide to Senate Records: Chapter 7 | National Archives
pricing 95 1.9× 18336 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/guides/catalog-tv-interviews-1951-to-1955.html
Television Interviews, 1951-1955 | National Archives
pricing 95 1.9× 26484 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-18.html
Guide to Senate Records: Chapter 18 | National Archives
pricing 95 1.9× 18130 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-13.html
Guide to Senate Records: Chapter 13 | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 18149 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/guides/still-pictures-guide
Guide to the Still Picture Branch Holdings | National Archives
pricing 95 1.6× 43492 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-23.html
Guide to House Records: Chapter 23 | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 15200 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/about/speeches/2013/12-4-2013.html
A Conversation with David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States | National Archives
pricing 95 1.9× 9117 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/strategic-plan/2000
Strategic Planning and Reporting | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 19885 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/13526.html
Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
pricing 95 1.9× 12970 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/nara
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) | National Archives
pricing 95 1.7× 26144 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/strategic-plan/2003
Strategic Planning and Reporting | National Archives
pricing 95 2.0× 17206 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/staff-pubs/2002-2004.html
NARA Staff Publications | National Archives
pricing 90 3.9× 3217 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/appraisal-evidential-values.html
Archives and Records Management Resources | National Archives
pricing 90 2.4× 6454 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/security.html
Archives and Security | National Archives
pricing 90 4.8× 2257 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/military/ww2.html
Military Resources: World War II | National Archives
pricing 90 4.9× 2080 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/women.html
Pathfinder for Women’s History Research | National Archives
pricing 90 2.6× 5889 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/staff-pubs/2014-2022
NARA Staff Publications 2014-2022 | National Archives
pricing 90 3.4× 5033 💰 Pricing
https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/principles-of-arrangement.html
Archives and Records Management Resources | National Archives
pricing 90 2.5× 5457 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/about/ 227 88 0% 5.3× High JS Bloat
/news/ 145 84 0% 8.6× High JS Bloat
/research/ 66 87 0% 5.7× High JS Bloat
/legislative/ 53 90 0% 3.1× Healthy
/developer/ 5 86 0% 6.9× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 90 0% 3.9× Healthy
/frc/ 1 85 0% 9.7× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 75 0% 11.4× High JS Bloat
/cui/ 1 75 0% 15.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1009 pages
addtoany.com ×933
usa.gov ×930
eservices.archives.gov ×818
federalregister.gov ×813
visit.archives.gov ×812
archivesfoundation.org ×812
nationalarchivesstore.org ×812
youtube.com ×459
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/archives.gov

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar government Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to archives.gov. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
archives.gov (this site) 56 78 Drupal 7.3× 1
mentalhealth.gov 79 81 Drupal 4.1× 3 Compare →
saskatoon.ca 78 81 Drupal 1.5× 0 Compare →
muskegon-mi.gov 78 88 WordPress 5.2× 1 Compare →
adaptiveplanning.com 78 91 Adobe Experience Manager 5.0× 1 Compare →
adaptiveinsights.com 78 91 Adobe Experience Manager 5.0× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite archives.gov when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

👻

Rendering Drop-Off by Depth

DEPTH PENALTY 933 PAGES
0%
Homepage Ghost
1%
Deep Pages Avg Ghost
2%
Homepage Bloat
18%
Deep Pages Avg Bloat
Ghost Ratio by Crawl Depth
Depth 0
0%
1 pg · ACRI 95
Orphan
1%
932 pg · ACRI 77
⚠️ Worst Rendering Pages
70% https://www.archives.gov/about/history/timeline.html orphan
20% https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/other orphan
20% https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-plan/2008 orphan
20% https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-plan/2015 orphan
20% https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-plan/2007 orphan
Deeper pages lose rendering fidelity. Pages at depth 4+ often show 2-3× higher ghost ratios than the homepage, meaning AI crawlers see progressively less of your actual content as they navigate deeper into the site architecture.
🏗️

Deep Architecture Health & Equity Distribution

933 PAGES
84.9%
Gini Inequality [?]
Extreme hoarding
85%
Top-3 PR Share [?]
Equity held by 3 pages
932
Orphan Pages [?]
99.9% of site
0.0
Avg Click Depth [?]
Max: 0 clicks
0
Internal Links
932 disconnected
24%
Semantic Cohesion [?]
Topical Drift
0% Healthy (receive equity)
0% Diluted hubs (>50 outbound)
100% Orphans (zero inbound)
🔗 Top Hub Pages (Highest PageRank)
https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-13.html https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archival-arrangement.html https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-04.html https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-07.html https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-23.html
⚠️
932 orphan pages receive zero internal link equity. A Gini coefficient of 0.85 means the top 3 pages hoard 85% of all internal PageRank — AI crawlers may never discover the rest.
💡 Quick Win: Optimal Link Injection
To rescue the orphan page archival arrangement.html, add a link to it from your high-authority Hub Page chapter 13.html. (Semantic Match: 45%)
📥 Orphan: https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archival-arrangement.html
🔗 Donor: https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-13.html (PR: 0.8502)
Get the full link injection plan for all 932 orphan pages
Unlock Full Link Strategy →
The Gini coefficient measures link equity inequality across your site. A Gini of 0.85 indicates significant equity concentration — a handful of pages dominate PageRank while others receive very little link authority. AI crawlers may deprioritize pages with low internal link signals.
🗂️

Topical Authority Distribution

10 TOPICS

How this domain's content is distributed across topic areas — derived from TF-IDF analysis of 933 crawled pages.

prepared, accordance, october
47 4 pgs (17%)
reference, nara, convenient
60 3 pgs (13%)
links, used, vessel
85 2 pgs (9%)
tools, also, created
75 2 pgs (9%)
glass, ones, like
90 2 pgs (9%)
record, documents, forever
47 2 pgs (9%)
but, issues, productivity
60 2 pgs (9%)
associations, page, individuals
80 2 pgs (9%)
cahoon, services, archivist
85 2 pgs (9%)
vermin, states, contained
90 2 pgs (9%)
Topical Authority shows how your content is concentrated. High concentration in few topics may limit long-tail search coverage; extreme fragmentation dilutes your authority signal.
🧲

Semantic Density

DEEP 814 TOPICS
814
Topic Clusters
via TF-IDF cosine, ε=.60
80
High-Density Pairs
>92% cosine similarity
Deep
Contextual Depth
>50 pairs
Reinforcing Content Clusters
🟢 links, used, vessel 100% avg similarity · ACRI 85–85
  • https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/archives-home-resources-26-0
  • https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/archives-home-resources-27
🟢 tools, also, created 100% avg similarity · ACRI 75–75
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/archivist/archivist-biography-ferriero.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/history/archivists/ferriero
🟢 glass, ones, like 100% avg similarity · ACRI 90–90
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/2000
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/performance/2000
🟢 record, documents, forever 100% avg similarity · ACRI 47–47
  • https://archives.gov/about
  • https://www.archives.gov/about
🟢 but, issues, productivity 100% avg similarity · ACRI 60–60
  • https://www.archives.gov/committees/founding-fathers/about/background.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/committees/founding-fathers/about/background.html
🟢 reference, nara, convenient 100% avg similarity · ACRI 60–60
  • https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/genealogy.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/pathfinders.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/space-centers-programs.html
🟢 prepared, accordance, october 100% avg similarity · ACRI 47–47
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/2010
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/2011
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/2012
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/plans-reports/performance-accountability/2013
🟢 associations, page, individuals 100% avg similarity · ACRI 75–85
  • https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-organizations.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archives-organizations.html
🟢 cahoon, services, archivist 99% avg similarity · ACRI 85–85
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/archivist/speeches/carlin
  • https://www.archives.gov/about/history/archivists/speeches.html
🟢 vermin, states, contained 99% avg similarity · ACRI 90–90
  • https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/house/chapter-01.html
  • https://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-01.html
Semantic Density measures how deeply your site covers each topic. High-density clusters (>92% similarity) mean multiple pages reinforce the same subject — this is positive for RAG/AI systems that need corroborating sources. Thin coverage (few clusters) means AI models have less evidence to cite you.
Get a full content consolidation plan for all 80 high-density pairs
Unlock Consolidation Plan →
🧬

Entity Knowledge Gap Analysis

11 MISSING 0% COVERAGE
🚨
Missing Core Entity — Critical
archives.gov has zero JSON-LD entities declared. AI models cannot identify your brand, product, or organization in their knowledge graph. This means:
  • AI search engines will not attribute content to your brand
  • No rich snippets or knowledge panels will be generated
  • Competitor entities will fill the gap in AI responses
Fix: Add Organization or Brand JSON-LD to your homepage.
⚠️ 11 entities mentioned in content but missing from structured data:
Go SSO REST AWS Rust Stripe Redis GitHub Jenkins Linear Notion
Each missing entity is a lost opportunity for rich snippet inclusion and AI knowledge graph integration.
Schema Coverage: 0 declared vs 18 extracted — 0% coverage Entities with <100% coverage create knowledge graph blind spots for AI systems
🧭

Semantic Nearest Neighbors

View all →
atu.ie
Educational services and research in various fields
38%
Overlap
76
ACRI
Compare
al-enterprise.com
Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise focuses on corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, partnering with organizations like Mercy Ships and Qhubeka to deliver
34%
Overlap
77
ACRI
Compare
anaplan.com
Anaplan is an AI-driven scenario planning and analysis platform for optimizing business decisions.
25%
Overlap
76
ACRI
Compare
atlassian.com
Bitbucket offers CI/CD, code collaboration, and project management with AI features for teams of varying sizes.
23%
Overlap
56
ACRI
Compare
alberta.ca
This website provides resources and guidelines for designing and engineering bridges and structures.
23%
Overlap
54
ACRI
Compare
View All Semantic Alternatives → 📚 Docs Quality Index →
🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

47
Homepage ACRI
53
Inner Avg ACRI
-6
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
7%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
47 20% pricing https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/admin-history
47 20% pricing https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/training.html
47 20% pricing https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/military
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

61 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

231
Total Links
61
Unique Domains
15.4
Avg/Page
26%
Diversity
addtoany.com usa.gov fold3.com go.galegroup.com nsarchive.chadwyck.com congressional.proquest.com ancestryinstitution.com search.ebscohost.com newspaperslibrary.proquest.com catalog.archives.gov
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 4.7

AI trust scores for the domains archives.gov links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to archives.gov. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Archives",
  "url": "https://archives.gov",
  "logo": "https://www.archives.gov/files/apple-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Archives",
  "url": "https://archives.gov",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://archives.gov/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Archives?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Archives does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Archives work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Archives."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for archives.gov:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
94
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →