cal.com 51 D
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 54 ⚡ Perf 36 🏗️ Arch 64

cal.com — Global SEODiff Score 51/100

cal.com
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for cal.com is strong: an ACRI of 67/100 places it ahead of 59% of domains in the index. Compared to other healthcare sites (avg score: 57), cal.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (10%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 50.0× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

51
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (36) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (110×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 16, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 3 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 16
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cal.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)54 × 0.40 = 21.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)36 × 0.20 = 7.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)64 × 0.15 = 9.6
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 21.6 + 7.2 + 9.6
Global SEODiff Score = 51 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
39
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #14771
+40 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 41%
Score 67/100

cal.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cal.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industryhealthcare
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

40 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

150 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 18
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://cal.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cal.com | Open Scheduling Infrastructure
  • ✓ og:description — A fully customizable scheduling software for individuals, businesses taking calls and developers building scheduling platforms where users meet users.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

54/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, adwordsguide.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cal.com
44
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. adwordsguide.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 39/100 — Low
Structured Elements 144 elements (144 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3146
Raw Density4.6%
💡Low structure score (39/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 144 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

37
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability37/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (85/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (19.7 KB)Bloat (2146.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context5% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage9 / 179 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 2166.5 KB, but only 19.7 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 5% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.1% · SNR: 0.01 · Signal: 5043 / Noise: 549571 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cal.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Cal.com provides an open-source scheduling infrastructure for businesses and enterprises, enabling them to self-host, customize, and maintain control over their
Target Audience
Enterprise organizations, government agencies, healthcare providers, and any organization requiring self-hosted scheduling solutions; developers, system administrators, and open-source enthusiasts.
Pricing Model
Open-source with a commercial tier offering enterprise features and support, with MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) as a key metric for tracking interest and retention.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHub
🛡️ Compliance Standards
HIPAAGDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
Its open-source nature, combined with a community-driven approach and a focus on infrastructure-readiness, creates a strong barrier to entry for competitors.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time622 ms
Raw HTML Size2166.5 KB
Visible Text Size19.7 KB

Performance & Speed

36/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

622 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

6530
DOM nodes
2166 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → public, max-age=0, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

64/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

275
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 44/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cal.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cal.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cal.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 127 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
44
Single-page score
+8
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 127 pages · Range 0–63
Topical Cohesion
7%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
250005
Avg Bloat
456.6×
RAG Fractures [?]
112
⚠️
112 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 112 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cal.com/about
Cal.com | Open Scheduling Infrastructure
pricing 63 35.8× 1534 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/pt/pricing
Preços | Cal.com
pricing 56 126.8× 2672 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/es/pricing
Precios | Cal.com
pricing 56 127.5× 2655 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/it/pricing
Prezzi | Cal.com
pricing 56 125.5× 2698 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/fr/pricing
Tarification | Cal.com
pricing 56 128.6× 2633 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/de/pricing
Preise | Cal.com
pricing 56 133.1× 2546 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/pricing
Pricing | Cal.com
pricing 56 138.1× 2448 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/nl/pricing
Prijsstelling | Cal.com
pricing 56 130.7× 2591 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/private-links-expirations-options
Manage Scheduling Privately with Private Links | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 94.9× 1892 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/setmore-vs-cal.com
Setmore vs Cal.com | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 77.4× 2534 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/best-online-doctor-appointment-scheduling-app
Best 7 Online Doctor Appointment Scheduling Apps | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 63.5× 3147 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/chili-piper-alternatives
6 Best Chili Piper Alternatives [2026 Edition] | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 62.6× 3031 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/round-robin-groups-scheduling
How Round Robin Groups Improve Multi-Role Scheduling | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 93.5× 1922 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-open-source-calendar-software-and-scheduler-tools
Open Source Calendar Guide - Top scheduler tools | Cal.com | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 67.0× 2711 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/from-studio-to-shoot-how-photographers-simplify-bookings-with-cal-com
Cal.com for photographers: simplify bookings from studio to shoot | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 137.6× 1281 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/best-scheduling-software-consultants-2025
Why consultants and contractors waste time scheduling | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 102.7× 1730 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/partnership-with-railway-self-hosting-calcom
Self-Host Cal.com with Railway in One Click | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 142.2× 1239 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/managed-events-scheduling-guide
Learn How to Use Managed Events for Smarter Team Scheduling | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 108.3× 1646 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/lead-distribution-software
Best Lead Distribution Software 2026 | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 59.6× 3396 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://cal.com/blog/setmore-vs-calendly-alternatives-which-should-you-pick
Setmore vs Calendly - Best Scheduling Alternative? | Cal.com | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings
pricing 56 38.4× 4942 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 112 54 0% 441.6× High JS Bloat
/pt/ 1 56 0% 126.8× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 22 1% 1887.2× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 63 1% 35.9× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 22 1% 3625.6× Bot Blocked
/fr/ 1 56 0% 128.6× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 22 1% 1986.0× Bot Blocked
/es/ 1 56 0% 127.5× High JS Bloat
/nl/ 1 56 0% 130.7× High JS Bloat
/it/ 1 56 0% 125.5× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 56 0% 138.1× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 1 56 0% 27.9× High JS Bloat
/de/ 1 56 0% 133.1× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cal.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cal.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cal.com (this site) 44 67 Custom / Proprietary 110.0× 0
atlasied.com 69 76 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
hsa.gov.sg 69 75 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
bfarm.de 69 78 Custom / Proprietary 3.7× 0 Compare →
livinghealthy.hawaiipacifichealth.org 69 78 Custom / Proprietary 5.4× 0 Compare →
ftwilliam.com 69 74 Custom / Proprietary 2.4× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cal.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

F 8 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

56
Homepage ACRI
42
Inner Avg ACRI
+14
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
61%
Inner Avg Ghost
100
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
63 80% pricing https://cal.com/about
22 70% pricing https://cal.com/features
22 70% pricing https://cal.com/integrations
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

12 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

32
Total Links
12
Unique Domains
4.0
Avg/Page
38%
Diversity
go.cal.com github.com app.cal.com trustpilot.com i.cal.com status.cal.com g2.com supademo.com x.com mintlify.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 19.2

AI trust scores for the domains cal.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cal.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Cal",
  "url": "https://cal.com",
  "logo": "https://framerusercontent.com/images/yBP2bxRn6dRgikoDZjkgAk2v0.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cal",
  "url": "https://cal.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cal.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cal?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cal does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cal work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cal."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cal.com:

Current Score
67
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

7.4
AI-Trust
#571
Global Rank
67%
Percentile
39
Inbound AI Links
7
Outbound AI Links
41
Avg Inbound ACRI
44%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
roapp.io 68 0.0 ← cites you
seojuice.io 63 0.0 ← cites you
poper.ai 53 0.0 ← cites you
smartlead.ai 52 0.0 ← cites you
evilmartians.com 51 0.0 ← cites you
emailwiz.ai 51 0.0 ← cites you
dub.co 50 0.0 ← cites you
yourgpt.ai 50 0.0 ← cites you
ltv.ai 49 0.0 ← cites you
stampede.ai 48 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →