cloud.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 45 🤖 GEO 73 ⚡ Perf 80 🏗️ Arch 62

cloud.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

cloud.com
📊

With a solid 65/100 ACRI, cloud.com is well-positioned for AI search — better than 55% of sites in the Radar. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places cloud.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. With a 2.9× bloat ratio, the page delivers its content without excessive boilerplate, giving AI systems a clean extraction path. Zero schema blocks puts this site at a disadvantage in knowledge graph and AI-answer pipelines that rely on explicit structured data. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (45) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 18, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 11
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -6 (49→43)
📉 Mar 18 ACRI -6 (49→43)
Does your site score higher than cloud.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)45 × 0.25 = 11.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)73 × 0.40 = 29.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)80 × 0.20 = 16.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)62 × 0.15 = 9.3
Weighted sum = 11.2 + 29.2 + 16.0 + 9.3
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
27
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #1761
+45 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 45%
Score 65/100

cloud.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cloud.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat2.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

45/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

25 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

224 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 3
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.cloud.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✗ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Cloud Software Group home
  • ✓ og:description — Cloud Software Group is a leading provider of enterprise infrastructure software solutions encompassing virtualization, integration, data management, automation, business intelligence, collaboration, networking and security.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

73/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cloud.com
43
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 27/100 — Low
Structured Elements 13 elements (13 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words589
Raw Density2.2%
💡Low structure score (27/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 13 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

53
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability53/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (10/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

34%
🗑️ 66%
Useful Content (8.5 KB)Bloat (15.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio2.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context43% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage3 / 7 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Only 43% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

52 Entropy
Fair Token Bloat: Medium
Noise Ratio: 65.3% · SNR: 0.53 · Signal: 2171 / Noise: 4078 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cloud.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Secure, unified digital workspace technology for a work-anywhere world
Target Audience
Enterprise software managers, IT directors, CIOs
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2GDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
Cloud-connected intelligence solving complex enterprise challenges
📊 Content Depth
5/10
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No pricing model mentioned
• No integration partners listed
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time708 ms
Raw HTML Size24.4 KB
Visible Text Size8.5 KB

Performance & Speed

80/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

708 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

259
DOM nodes
24 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → must-revalidate, max-age=7200
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

62/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✗ Sitemap declared in robots.txt
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

6
internal links
3
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✗ HTML lang attribute
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 43/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cloud.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cloud.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cloud.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 23 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
43
Single-page score
+1
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
44
Avg across 23 pages · Range 44–44
Total Words
2714
Avg Bloat
81.0×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cloud.com/api
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
docs 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/pricing
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
pricing 44 81.0× 118
https://cloud.com/guides
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
blog 44 81.0× 118
https://cloud.com/resources
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
blog 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/help
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
support 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/about
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
about 44 81.0× 118
https://cloud.com/solutions
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
product 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/products
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
product 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/features
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
product 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/docs
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
docs 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/blog
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
blog 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/get-started
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
conversion 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/demo
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
conversion 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/case-studies
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
social-proof 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/contact
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
support 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/support
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
support 44 81.0× 118
https://cloud.com/integrations
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
integrations 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/faq
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
support 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/security
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
trust 44 81.1× 118
https://cloud.com/trust
Mission Critical Enterprise Software - Cloud Software Group
trust 44 81.1× 118
Showing 20 of 23 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/privacy/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/trust/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/security/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 44 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/case-studies/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/terms/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/demo/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 44 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/api/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/support/ 1 44 0% 81.0× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/integrations/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
/careers/ 1 44 0% 81.1× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 23 pages
citrix.com ×23
jaspersoft.com ×23
infoscale.com ×23
arctera.com ×23
submit-irm.trustarc.com ×23
spotfire.com ×23
citrix.cloud.com ×23
tibco.com ×23
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cloud.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cloud.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cloud.com (this site) 43 65 Custom / Proprietary 2.9× 0
101jucarii.ro 68 76 Custom / Proprietary 2.2× 0 Compare →
luminous-club.com 68 80 Custom / Proprietary 4.3× 0 Compare →
stpete.org 68 79 Custom / Proprietary 7.4× 0 Compare →
spectrumcontrol.com 68 81 Custom / Proprietary 7.7× 1 Compare →
clutch-solution.com 68 79 Custom / Proprietary 5.4× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cloud.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

44
Homepage ACRI
44
Inner Avg ACRI
0
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
44 40% about https://cloud.com/about
44 40% product https://cloud.com/products
44 40% product https://cloud.com/features
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 50/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

10 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

150
Total Links
10
Unique Domains
10.0
Avg/Page
7%
Diversity
ibi.com spotfire.com arctera.com tibco.com jaspersoft.com infoscale.com submit-irm.trustarc.com careers.cloud.com citrix.com citrix.cloud.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 0.3

AI trust scores for the domains cloud.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cloud.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Cloud",
  "url": "https://cloud.com",
  "logo": "https://cloud.com/icons/fav/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Cloud",
  "url": "https://cloud.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://cloud.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cloud?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cloud does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cloud work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cloud."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cloud.com:

Current Score
65
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+13 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →