cookieyes.com 78 B
🛡️ SEO 75 🤖 GEO 87 ⚡ Perf 53 🏗️ Arch 93

cookieyes.com — Global SEODiff Score 78/100

cookieyes.com
📋 Executive Audit

CookieYes operates as a leading infrastructure provider in the cookie consent and privacy compliance space, offering a SaaS platform designed to help websites manage user consent in accordance with global privacy regulations. With a Global SEODiff Score of 76 and an ACRI Grade of B, the domain demonstrates strong foundational SEO health, particularly in technical architecture and AI-readiness. Its AI Readiness GEO score of 87 indicates robust alignment with emerging AI-powered search ecosystems, positioning it well for future search visibility. However, performance remains a critical bottleneck, with a TTFB of 4.1 seconds and a Performance score of 40, significantly impacting user experience and search rankings.

The site excels in technical architecture, earning a 93/100 in this domain, evidenced by a well-structured internal link graph (149 internal links), declared sitemap, and strong security protocols including HSTS and CSP. It also enjoys full AI bot access, with gptbot, claudebot, ccbot, and Google Extended all permitted, and no restrictive `noai` meta tags in place. Structured data is present but limited—only Organization and Breadcrumb markup are implemented, missing key schema types like Product and FAQ that could enhance rich snippet visibility. While extractability (82) and semantic structure (74) are solid, content integrity (66) and retrieval robustness (63) suggest room for improvement in content clarity, consistency, and query coverage.

From an architectural and crawlability standpoint, the site shows high efficiency: 0% ghost ratio, low token bloat (6.8x), and a relatively lean HTML payload (126.5 KB), though only 19,049 bytes of useful text are present—indicating potential content density issues. The low word count (877) across the page suggests content may be underdeveloped for competitive keywords. To maximize visibility, CookieYes should prioritize performance optimization—reducing TTFB through caching or CDN improvements—and expand structured data with product and FAQ schema. Additionally, enriching core content with deeper topical coverage and semantic variation would strengthen retrieval robustness and position the site as a dominant authority in privacy compliance.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
78
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (53) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 30 snapshots
Feb 21 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than cookieyes.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)75 × 0.25 = 18.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)87 × 0.40 = 34.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)53 × 0.20 = 10.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)93 × 0.15 = 13.9
Weighted sum = 18.8 + 34.8 + 10.6 + 13.9
Global SEODiff Score = 78 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
75
Structure
avg 35
44
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.3%
Rank #2702
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 2%
Score 85/100

cookieyes.com has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why cookieyes.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat6.9×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

75/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

33 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

135 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 25
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.cookieyes.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — CookieYes Cookie Consent Solution
  • ✓ og:description — CookieYes is a cookie consent solution that helps your website achieve GDPR and CCPA compliance easily. Create a lifetime free account!
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

87/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
cookieyes.com
73
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 75/100 — Good
Structured Elements 148 elements (148 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words877
Raw Density16.9%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

73
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability73/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

14%
🗑️ 86%
Useful Content (18.2 KB)Bloat (108.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio6.9× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context60% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage27 / 45 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 85.6% · SNR: 0.17 · Signal: 4658 / Noise: 27698 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of cookieyes.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides a collaborative sprint planning tool that leverages AI to optimize resource allocation and predict sprint outcomes,
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and agile teams involved in software development and project management.
Pricing Model
Offers a tiered subscription model: a free plan with limited features, a standard plan ($10/user/month), and a premium plan ($25/user/month) with advanced capabilities.
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2
🏆 Competitive Moat
The AI-powered sprint planning and resource optimization capabilities provide a significant advantage over traditional sprint planning tools, leading to improved predictability and reduced wasted effort.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time1149 ms
Raw HTML Size126.4 KB
Visible Text Size18.2 KB

Performance & Speed

53/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1149 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

949
DOM nodes
126 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

93/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.cookieyes.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

149
internal links
8
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 73/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for cookieyes.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/cookieyes.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=cookieyes.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 4 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
73
Single-page score
-59
Severe hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
14
Avg across 4 pages · Range 0–56
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 73, but internal pages average only 14 — a -59-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
480
Avg Bloat
2.7×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://cookieyes.com/faq support 56 10.7× 480
https://cookieyes.com/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://cookieyes.com/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://cookieyes.com/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 56 0% 10.7× High JS Bloat
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/cookieyes.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to cookieyes.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
cookieyes.com (this site) 73 85 WordPress 6.9× 2
profitserver.net 86 90 WordPress 3.8× 2 Compare →
driphydration.com 86 95 WordPress 1.9× 2 Compare →
safely.co.jp 90 90 WordPress 1.9× 3 Compare →
hi-ad.jp 86 90 WordPress 3.1× 5 Compare →
meriambet.us.com 87 95 WordPress 4.1× 6 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite cookieyes.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to cookieyes.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Cookieyes?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Cookieyes does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Cookieyes work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Cookieyes."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for cookieyes.com:

Current Score
85
Projected Score
91
Improvement
+6 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

8.3
AI-Trust
#500
Global Rank
72%
Percentile
37
Inbound AI Links
0
Outbound AI Links
57
Avg Inbound ACRI
5%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
nameshield.com 64 2.7 ← cites you
ffrf.org 72 0.0 ← cites you
skyprepapp.com 67 0.0 ← cites you
nrttech.com 67 0.0 ← cites you
cerrad.com 66 0.0 ← cites you
linkgraph.com 65 0.0 ← cites you
moj.io 65 0.0 ← cites you
cenia.cz 65 0.0 ← cites you
bestop.com 64 0.0 ← cites you
openbanking.org.uk 64 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →