etoday.co.kr 68 C
🛡️ SEO 57 🤖 GEO 84 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 80

etoday.co.kr — Global SEODiff Score 68/100

etoday.co.kr
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for etoday.co.kr is strong: an ACRI of 78/100 places it ahead of 88% of domains in the index. In the news sector, etoday.co.kr outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (5%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A tight 1.9× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

68
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 28 snapshots
Mar 3 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than etoday.co.kr?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)57 × 0.25 = 14.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)84 × 0.40 = 33.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)80 × 0.15 = 12.0
Weighted sum = 14.2 + 33.6 + 7.8 + 12.0
Global SEODiff Score = 68 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
61
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 6%
Rank #58091
+7 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 12%
Score 78/100

etoday.co.kr shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why etoday.co.kr ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrynews
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat1.9×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

57/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

38 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

164 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.etoday.co.kr/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 경제신문 이투데이
  • ✓ og:description — 경제신문 이투데이는 국내외 경제 이슈에 대한 심층 분석, 차별화된 기획기사로 구성된 뉴스를 발 빠르게 전하고 있습니다.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

84/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the news sector, medi.de (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
etoday.co.kr
67
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. medi.de has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses TYPO3. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 61/100 — Good
Structured Elements 231 elements (231 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words2073
Raw Density11.1%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

74
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability74/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (50/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

52%
🗑️ 48%
Useful Content (109.8 KB)Bloat (101.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio1.9× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context83% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage87 / 105 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

78 Entropy
Good Token Bloat: Low
Noise Ratio: 48.1% · SNR: 1.08 · Signal: 28112 / Noise: 26095 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of etoday.co.kr and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
CJ Group is leveraging its logistics expertise through CJ GLS to compete with STX and Golden Koryo for the acquisition
Target Audience
M&A advisors, logistics professionals, investment analysts, and corporate strategy teams.
Pricing Model
Not specified - likely a combination of strategic acquisitions and internal revenue generation.
🔗 Integration Partners
KakaoFacebookX (Twitter)
🏆 Competitive Moat
Strategic acquisition leveraging CJ's existing logistics network and key personnel, providing a competitive advantage in the Korean market.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-03-03

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1042 ms
Raw HTML Size211.7 KB
Visible Text Size109.8 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1042 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1807
DOM nodes
212 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

80/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.etoday.co.kr/rss/web_sitemap_index
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

428
internal links
19
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ko
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 67/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for etoday.co.kr
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/etoday.co.kr" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=etoday.co.kr" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 73 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
67
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
61
Avg across 73 pages · Range 0–75
Total Words
74679
Avg Bloat
18.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86373
CJ그룹, 대한통운 인수전 닻 올렸다 - 이투데이
pricing 75 18.8× 1507 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86272
정통부, 10개 지역 SW 특화육성사업 선정 - 이투데이
pricing 75 19.6× 1281 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86303
[상가분양소식]등촌동 '어 위시' 外 - 이투데이
pricing 75 17.5× 1468 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86313
허창수 GS회장 “수익원 발굴, 성장역량 강화” - 이투데이
pricing 75 19.1× 1316 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86355
[신년사]현대그룹 현정은 회장 - 이투데이
pricing 75 17.9× 1457 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86370
작년 국내IT수출 780억불 달성...올 883억불 전망 - 이투데이
pricing 75 18.9× 1329 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86280
상가분양업체들 생존위해 분양가 인하 - 이투데이
pricing 75 19.9× 1256 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86441
정부, '송파신도시 개발 확고' 거듭 표명 - 이투데이
pricing 75 18.4× 1374 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86437
‘오락가락’ 판교신도시 정책, 결국 법정행 - 이투데이
pricing 75 17.1× 1501 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86349
[신년사]주택금융공사 정홍식 사장 - 이투데이
pricing 75 12.0× 2279 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86428
금호산업 목표가 2만9300원 상향-한누리證 - 이투데이
pricing 70 23.9× 1052 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86321
건설업 고용시장 한파 올해도 지속 - 이투데이
pricing 70 22.5× 1094 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86432
GS건설 목표가 6만원 상향-JP모건 - 이투데이
pricing 70 23.7× 1062 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86290
우리투자證, 기업신용등급 ‘AA-’ 획득 - 이투데이
pricing 70 22.4× 1130 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86297
부동산정책 국민 만족도 47.7점 - 이투데이
pricing 70 20.4× 1224 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86275
수출입 컨테이너 철도수송 1천만톤 시대 개막 - 이투데이
pricing 70 22.7× 1087 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86284
8.31후속 입법 국회통과 '절반의 성공' - 이투데이
pricing 70 20.6× 1214 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86292
국민주택채권 취급은행 확대된다 - 이투데이
pricing 70 22.9× 1076 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86289
첫 종합물류기업 인증업체 올 4월 등장 - 이투데이
pricing 70 20.2× 1238 💰 Pricing
https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/86271
우리투자證, 파생상품 분야 강화 - 이투데이
pricing 70 22.5× 1124 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 73 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/news/ 63 71 0% 21.4× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 73 pages
blog.naver.com ×63
instagram.com ×63
tv.kakao.com ×63
youtube.com ×63
member.etoday.co.kr ×63
twitter.com ×63
company.etoday.co.kr ×63
bravo.etoday.co.kr ×63
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/etoday.co.kr

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar news Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to etoday.co.kr. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
etoday.co.kr (this site) 67 78 Custom / Proprietary 1.9× 1
fxsignup.com 75 80 Custom / Proprietary 3.0× 1 Compare →
muenzeoesterreich.at 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.8× 0 Compare →
xxxx8k.com 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 0 Compare →
toptubeporn.com 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
pornvideosbest.com 76 80 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite etoday.co.kr when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to etoday.co.kr. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Co",
  "url": "https://etoday.co.kr",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://etoday.co.kr/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Co?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Co does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Co work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Co."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for etoday.co.kr:

Current Score
78
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+7 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →