grammarly.com 63 C
🛡️ SEO 50 🤖 GEO 66 ⚡ Perf 52 🏗️ Arch 94

grammarly.com — Global SEODiff Score 63/100

grammarly.com
📊

At 77/100, the ACRI for grammarly.com indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Compared to other infrastructure sites (avg score: 57), grammarly.com performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. Heavy markup overhead (50.0× bloat) forces AI systems to wade through excess code before finding useful information. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

63
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (50) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (55×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 8 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 4 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than grammarly.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)50 × 0.25 = 12.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)66 × 0.40 = 26.4
⚡ Performance (20% weight)52 × 0.20 = 10.4
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)94 × 0.15 = 14.1
Weighted sum = 12.5 + 26.4 + 10.4 + 14.1
Global SEODiff Score = 63 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
76
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #274
+14 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 14%
Score 77/100

grammarly.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why grammarly.com ranks here

Tech stackNext.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

50/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

37 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

124 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 15
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.grammarly.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Grammarly: Free AI Writing Assistance
  • ✓ og:description — Grammarly makes AI writing convenient. Work smarter with personalized AI guidance and text generation on any app or website.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

66/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
grammarly.com
59
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 76/100 — Good
Structured Elements 219 elements (219 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1266
Raw Density17.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

49
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability49/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (8.5 KB)Bloat (462.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context69% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage35 / 51 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 470.6 KB, but only 8.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.2% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 2182 / Noise: 118294 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of grammarly.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
AI communication partner improving writing for individuals and organizations
Target Audience
Individuals, professionals, teams, businesses, educational institutions
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, including free, pro, and enterprise options
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-driven communication assistance, secure and private data handling
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
directory listingscomparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No specific technical issues observable in this text
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNext.js
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time633 ms
Raw HTML Size470.6 KB
Visible Text Size8.5 KB

Performance & Speed

52/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

633 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1583
DOM nodes
471 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, no-store, no-cache
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

94/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.grammarly.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

193
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 59/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for grammarly.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/grammarly.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=grammarly.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 989 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
59
Single-page score
-7
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 989 pages · Range 0–65
Topical Cohesion
4%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
961429
Avg Bloat
86.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
983
⚠️
983 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 983 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/business-plan-generator
Free AI Business Plan Generator | Business Plan Maker
pricing 65 25.8× 2802 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/report-writer
Report Writing Tool l Grammarly
pricing 65 25.7× 2906 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/privacy-policy-2022
Privacy Policy | Grammarly
pricing 65 14.8× 5200 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/blog-post-generator
Blog Writing Tool l Grammarly
pricing 65 30.5× 2071 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/samsung
Grammarly-AI Writing Assistant - Apps on Google Play
pricing 64 224.6× 1094 💰 Pricing
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/resume-skills-generator
AI Resume Skills Generator | Grammarly
pricing 62 44.7× 1521 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker
Plagiarism Checker | Grammarly
pricing 62 53.2× 2072 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/grammar-check
Free Grammar Checker | #1 AI-Powered Grammar Check
pricing 62 68.8× 1211 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/paragraph-generator
Free AI-powered Paragraph Generator & Writer
pricing 62 48.3× 1285 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/spell-checker
Free Spell-Checker | AI-powered Online Spell Check
pricing 62 84.1× 904 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/instagram-caption-generator
Free AI Instagram Caption Generator | No Sign-up Required
pricing 62 47.8× 1352 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/sentence-checker
Sentence Checker | Grammarly
pricing 62 73.9× 973 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/letter-generator
Free AI Letter Writer
pricing 62 39.6× 2306 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/executive-summary-generator
AI Executive Summary Tool l Grammarly
pricing 62 47.4× 1327 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/email-writer
Free Email Writer | AI-powered Email Writing Assistant
pricing 62 49.3× 1379 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/cover-letter-generator
AI Cover Letter Generator | Grammarly
pricing 62 32.6× 2426 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/job-description-generator
Free AI Job Description Generator | No Sign-up Required
pricing 62 32.2× 2260 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/article-writer
Free AI Article Writer & Generator | No Sign-up Required
pricing 62 31.5× 2255 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/personal-statement-generator
AI Personal Statement Generator
pricing 62 39.5× 1748 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.grammarly.com/ai/ai-writing-tools/resume-objective-generator
AI Résumé Objective Generator
pricing 62 57.4× 1048 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/citations/ 286 57 1% 54.8× Bot Blocked
/commonly-confused-words/ 148 50 1% 73.5× Bot Blocked
/ai/ 26 62 1% 48.7× Bot Blocked
/business/ 4 57 1% 116.0× Bot Blocked
/desktop/ 2 57 1% 128.1× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 2 57 1% 55.2× Bot Blocked
/features/ 2 58 1% 47.4× Bot Blocked
/ai-detector/ 1 62 1% 39.9× Bot Blocked
/passive-voice-checker/ 1 58 1% 81.8× Bot Blocked
/acceptable-use-policy/ 1 53 1% 20.2× Bot Blocked
/premium/ 1 58 1% 54.0× Bot Blocked
/ai-writer/ 1 57 1% 92.5× Bot Blocked
/authorship/ 1 57 1% 51.2× Bot Blocked
/proofreading/ 1 57 1% 69.2× Bot Blocked
/pricing/ 1 56 0% 145.5× High JS Bloat
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/grammarly.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to grammarly.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
grammarly.com (this site) 59 77 Next.js 55.2× 0
tv.rakuten.co.jp 84 89 Next.js 3.8× 3 Compare →
thebasewarehouse.com.au 84 89 Next.js 2.6× 5 Compare →
goblingaming.co.uk 84 97 Next.js 4.4× 13 Compare →
multicanalatacado.com.br 84 92 Custom / Proprietary 1.3× 1 Compare →
m2m-dmt.net 84 88 TYPO3 2.2× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite grammarly.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

56
Homepage ACRI
50
Inner Avg ACRI
+6
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
75%
Inner Avg Ghost
14
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
57 90% pricing https://www.grammarly.com/docs
49 90% pricing https://grammarly.com/products
57 90% pricing https://www.grammarly.com/trust
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 50/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 2261 Market Street, Suite 85232 San Francisco, CA 94114 United States
🔗

Citation Profile

13 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

102
Total Links
13
Unique Domains
6.8
Avg/Page
13%
Diversity
support.grammarly.com facebook.com instagram.com twitter.com linkedin.com superhuman.com app.grammarly.com go.grammarly.com business-tour.grammarly.com grammarly.wistia.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 38.0

AI trust scores for the domains grammarly.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to grammarly.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Grammarly",
  "url": "https://grammarly.com",
  "logo": "https://static-web.grammarly.com/cms/master/public/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Grammarly",
  "url": "https://grammarly.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://grammarly.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Grammarly?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Grammarly does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Grammarly work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Grammarly."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for grammarly.com:

Current Score
77
Projected Score
95
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →