hh.ru operates as a leading career and recruitment platform in Russia, primarily focused on connecting job seekers with employers across industries, including IT. Despite its strong market presence and high Tranco rank (2,272), the site’s Global SEODiff Score of 48 and ACRI Grade of D indicate significant room for improvement in search visibility and user trust. While it scores highly in Architecture (88) and Extractability (92), suggesting strong crawlability and structural integrity, its AI Readiness (67) and Performance (22) scores reveal critical weaknesses in content delivery and technical optimization, particularly in speed and rendering efficiency.
The site demonstrates strong technical foundations with a low ghost ratio (5.0%), open access for major AI crawlers (including GPT, Claude, and Google Extended), and proper HSTS implementation. However, TTFB of 2,117ms and 1.03MB HTML payload severely impact user experience and search engine performance. The semantic structure score of 25 is alarmingly low, indicating poor content organization and lack of semantic enrichment. Additionally, the absence of structured data—no schema for organization, articles, FAQs, or breadcrumbs—limits the site’s ability to communicate context to search engines, reducing visibility in rich results and AI-powered search. The content integrity score of 73 is moderate, but the retrieval robustness of 10 suggests significant issues with consistent content availability and indexing.
Architecturally, hh.ru benefits from a well-linked internal structure (91 internal links) and a declared sitemap, but the complete absence of external links may indicate limited authority-building through backlinks. The lack of structured data and poor semantic structure represent the most urgent opportunities for improvement. To elevate its AI-readiness and performance, the site should prioritize reducing HTML payload, optimizing TTFB, implementing schema markup, and enhancing content semantics. Addressing these gaps would not only improve its ACRI score but also strengthen its position in both traditional SEO and emerging AI-driven search ecosystems.
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
hh.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →
Why hh.ru ranks here
Fastest improvements
- Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
- Create an
llms.txtfile so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt → - Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
Traditional SEO
13/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence📝 Title Tag
Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.
📋 Meta Description
Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.
🔤 Heading Hierarchy
- ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
- ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 2
- ✗ <h2> not before <h1>
🔍 Indexability
- ✓ Canonical tag present →
https://hh.ru/ - ✓ No noindex directive
- ✓ Meta viewport set
- ✓ HTML lang attribute →
ru - ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
- ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt
🌐 Social / OpenGraph
- ✓ og:title — Работа в Москве, поиск персонала и публикация вакансий - hh.ru
- ✓ og:description — hh.ru — сервис, который помогает найти работу и подобрать персонал в Москве более 20 лет! Создавайте резюме и откликайтесь на вакансии. Набирайте сотрудников и публикуйте вакансии.
- ✓ og:image — preview
- ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated
SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)
Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.
AI Readiness / GEO
67/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High ConfidenceThis pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.
Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.
🤖 Bot Access Matrix
📊 Structure & Information Density Docs
🏷️ Schema Health Docs
Schema Coverage Map
📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs
Token Bloat Research
Multimodal Readiness
TDM Rights
🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research
🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation
See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
AI Answer Preview
NEWSee how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.
The LLM Interpretation
AI-VERIFIEDSEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of hh.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.
🔧 Tech Stack
Performance & Speed
34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence⏱️ Time to First Byte
Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.
📦 Page Weight
DOM nodes
HTML payload
🗄️ Cache & CDN
- ✓ Cache-Control header →
no-cache, no-store - ✗ CDN cache status
- ✗ CDN detected
🔬 Tracker Tax
tracker scripts
third-party domains
token overhead
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated
Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)
TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.
Architecture & Trust
88/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence🗺️ Sitemap & Robots
- ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt →
https://hh.ru/sitemap/main.xml - ✓ Googlebot allowed
- ✓ GPTBot allowed
- ✓ ClaudeBot allowed
🔗 Linking
internal links
external links
🔒 Security & Trust
- ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
- ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
- ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)
♿ Accessibility Signals
- ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
- ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
- ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated
Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)
Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.
🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge
Your site scores 41/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/hh.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=hh.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>
💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.
� Deep Crawl Analysis 1008 pages · Deep-10
Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.
| Page | Type | ACRI | Token Bloat | Words | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pricing | 85 | 9.9× | 7702 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.9× | 7747 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.3× | 8662 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.9× | 7921 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 8.8× | 10086 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.6× | 8091 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.8× | 7575 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.3× | 9228 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.7× | 7925 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 7.6× | 12112 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.8× | 7839 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.2× | 8693 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.8× | 7753 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 8.7× | 9225 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 7.1× | 13295 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 7.0× | 13650 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.3× | 8607 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.6× | 8017 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.3× | 8141 | 💰 Pricing | |
| pricing | 85 | 9.7× | 7931 | 💰 Pricing |
| Path | Pages | Avg ACRI | Ghost % | Bloat | Top Issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /article/ | 439 | 80 | 0% | 10.1× | High JS Bloat |
| /mentors/ | 32 | 75 | 0% | 11.7× | High JS Bloat |
| /articles/ | 22 | 75 | 0% | 13.5× | High JS Bloat |
| /resumes/ | 5 | 75 | 0% | 18.0× | High JS Bloat |
| /calendar/ | 1 | 75 | 0% | 12.0× | High JS Bloat |
| /vacancies/ | 1 | 77 | 0% | 9.8× | High JS Bloat |
Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).
🔌 API Access
Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.
curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/hh.ruGet your free API key — 100 requests/month included.
🔗 Similar education Sites
Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to hh.ru. Compare side-by-side.
| Domain | ACRI | AI Score | Tech Stack | Token Bloat | Schema | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hh.ru (this site) | 41 | 62 | Express | 1.3× | 0 | — |
| lauderhillpaulturner.browardschools.com | 66 | 75 | Express | 5.6× | 0 | Compare → |
| scusd.edu | 66 | 75 | Express | 5.7× | 0 | Compare → |
| solvation.de | 66 | 75 | TYPO3 | 1.7× | 0 | Compare → |
| knust.edu.gh | 66 | 77 | Drupal | 2.2× | 0 | Compare → |
| career.cup.edu.cn | 66 | 82 | Gatsby | 2.7× | 0 | Compare → |
📊 Semantic Share of Voice
How often would an AI cite hh.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.
Analyzing citation landscape…
Bait & Switch Delta
A 15 PAGESCompares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.
Worst Inner Pages
E-E-A-T Trust Signals
F 10/100Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.
Citation Profile
33 DOMAINSOutbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.
AI trust scores for the domains hh.ru links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.
Remediation Patches
COPY-PASTEAuto-generated code fixes tailored to hh.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Hh",
"url": "https://hh.ru",
"logo": "https://i.hh.ru/apple/hh/touch-icon-ipad.png?v=05022025",
"sameAs": []
}
</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebSite",
"name": "Hh",
"url": "https://hh.ru",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "SearchAction",
"target": "https://hh.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
"query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
}
}
</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is Hh?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Add your answer here — describe what Hh does in 1-2 sentences."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How does Hh work?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Hh."
}
}
]
}
</script>
Projected Impact
ROI EST.If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for hh.ru:
*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.
📋 Data Export
Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).
All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).
Is this your company?
Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.
Start Free →