kth.se 72 B
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 78 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 99

kth.se — Global SEODiff Score 72/100

kth.se
📊

At 69/100, the ACRI for kth.se indicates strong fundamentals in AI extractability, surpassing the majority of indexed sites. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. A tight 4.1× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. The complete absence of JSON-LD schema is a missed opportunity: even basic Organization markup would improve how AI crawlers understand this domain. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

72
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (46) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 18 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
📉 Mar 12 ACRI -1 (53→52)
🔄 Mar 11 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 8 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 6 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than kth.se?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)78 × 0.40 = 31.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)99 × 0.15 = 14.8
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 31.2 + 14.8 + 14.8
Global SEODiff Score = 72 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
46
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.8%
Rank #7511
+36 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 36%
Score 69/100

kth.se punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why kth.se ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industry
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat4.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

51 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

149 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 29
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.kth.se/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv-SE
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — KTH - Sveriges största tekniska universitet | KTH
  • ✓ og:description — KTH - Kungliga Tekniska högskolan - är ett av Europas ledande tekniska universitet och samlar studenter, forskare och fakultet från hela världen.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

78/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 46/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 42 elements (42 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words649
Raw Density6.5%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

59
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability59/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

24%
🗑️ 76%
Useful Content (14.9 KB)Bloat (46.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.1× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context94% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage15 / 16 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

23 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.6% · SNR: 0.32 · Signal: 3808 / Noise: 11799 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of kth.se and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
The website describes a network of research centers at KTH focused on various technological advancements and societal challenges, including digitalization,
Target Audience
Researchers, industry professionals, policymakers, and students interested in advanced technologies and sustainable solutions across diverse fields.
Pricing Model
⚠ SEMANTIC VOID
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubLSISynchrotron
🛡️ Compliance Standards
SOC 2GDPR
🏆 Competitive Moat
The network’s collaborative structure and integration with industry provide a strong competitive advantage through access to diverse expertise and real-world application of research.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Thin landing pages for features
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time884 ms
Raw HTML Size61.0 KB
Visible Text Size14.9 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

884 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

554
DOM nodes
61 KB
HTML payload
Lean page — fast for bots and users

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=120,public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

99/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.kth.se/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

57
internal links
1
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → sv-SE
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 52/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for kth.se
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/kth.se" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=kth.se" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 88 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
52
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 88 pages · Range 0–77
Topical Cohesion
13%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
45812
Avg Bloat
29.9×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/publicera-analysera/vagledning-for-publicering/spika-avhandling
Beskrivning av hur man spikar i DiVA steg för steg | KTH
other 77 8.2× 1756
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/publicera-analysera/vagledning-for-publicering
Publicera din forskning | KTH
other 77 9.3× 1627
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/publicera-analysera/vagledning-for-publicering/publicera-oppet-till/publicera-oppet-tillgangligt-1.859196
Publicera öppet tillgängligt | KTH
other 77 7.6× 3088
https://www.kth.se/forskning/sarskilda-forskningssatsningar/kompetenscentra/centrumbildningar-1.1156831
Centrumbildningar | KTH
other 77 7.8× 1763
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/soka-vardera/vardera-information-1.1304059
Värdera information | KTH
other 77 7.7× 2174
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/publicera-analysera/vagledning-for-publicering/hantera-publikationer
Registrera publikationer i DiVA | KTH
other 77 9.1× 1684
https://www.kth.se/utbildning/vidareutbildning
Kompetensutveckling för yrkesverksamma | KTH
other 67 15.6× 814
https://www.kth.se/forskning/sarskilda-forskningssatsningar/strategiska-initiativ/kth-s-strategiska-forskningsinitiativ-1.1362745
KTH:s strategiska forskningsinitiativ | KTH
other 67 16.2× 772
https://www.kth.se/forskning/sarskilda-forskningssatsningar/eit-1.63977
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) | KTH
other 67 15.4× 705
https://www.kth.se/forskning/sarskilda-forskningssatsningar/strategiska-forskningsomraden
Nationella strategiska forskningsområden | KTH
other 67 16.5× 696
https://www.kth.se/forskning/sarskilda-forskningssatsningar/forskningsprogram-kaw/forskningsprogram-finansierade-av-knut-och-alice-wallenbergs-stiftelse-1.1229243
Forskningsprogram finansierade av Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse | KTH
other 67 16.0× 634
https://www.kth.se/samverkan/samverka-med-forskare
Samverka med forskare | KTH
other 67 15.2× 570 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.kth.se/om/innovation
KTH Innovation | KTH
other 67 15.6× 832
https://www.kth.se/om/fakta/rankning-for-kth-1.531848
Rankning för KTH | KTH
other 67 13.5× 620
https://www.kth.se/om/stod-kth/investera-i-framtiden-1.632922
Stöd KTH | Låt oss nå längre | KTH
other 67 14.4× 777
https://www.kth.se/samverkan/partnerskap/nyheter-fran-partner
Nyheter | KTH
pricing 67 12.2× 1014 💰 Pricing
https://www.kth.se/om/nyheter
Nyheter från KTH | KTH
other 67 16.4× 640
https://www.kth.se/biblioteket/anvanda-biblioteket/lana-och-bestalla/lana-och-bestalla-1.853035
Låna och beställa | KTH
other 67 10.9× 1132
https://www.kth.se/om/stod-kth
Stöd KTH | Låt oss nå längre | KTH
other 67 14.4× 777
https://www.kth.se/om/kontakt/faktura-och-betalning-kth-1.2317
Faktura och betalning KTH | KTH
other 67 14.2× 599
Showing 20 of 88 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/biblioteket/ 30 60 0% 28.1× High JS Bloat
/om/ 19 52 0% 35.1× High JS Bloat
/forskning/ 15 51 0% 41.9× High JS Bloat
/samverkan/ 10 49 0% 40.1× High JS Bloat
/utbildning/ 2 58 0% 19.0× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/studies/ 1 49 0% 28.6× High JS Bloat
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/alumni/ 1 49 0% 24.5× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 88 pages
canvas.kth.se ×78
webmail.kth.se ×78
intra.kth.se ×78
wagnerguide.com ×15
kth-se.zoom.us ×11
play.kth.se ×10
kth-ch.primo.exlibrisgroup.com ×7
apps.lib.kth.se ×5
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/kth.se

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to kth.se. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
kth.se (this site) 52 69 Custom / Proprietary 4.1× 0
uem.br 62 74 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 0 Compare →
hpu.edu 62 72 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 0 Compare →
imortaljashujan.com 62 77 Cloudflare Pages 3.8× 0 Compare →
jackworld.us 62 15 Cloudflare Pages 2.7× 0 Compare →
aurorapeakgg.com 62 15 Cloudflare Pages 2.2× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite kth.se when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

33
Homepage ACRI
37
Inner Avg ACRI
-4
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
36%
Inner Avg Ghost
0
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
33 60% other https://www.kth.se/forskning/omraden/industriell-teknik-och-management-1.659466
36 40% other https://www.kth.se/om/kontakt/campus
36 40% other https://www.kth.se/samverkan/samverka-med-student
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 20/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

21 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

71
Total Links
21
Unique Domains
4.7
Avg/Page
30%
Diversity
intra.kth.se canvas.kth.se webmail.kth.se arch.kth.se mse.kth.se kth-exjobb.powerappsportals.com play.kth.se energy.kth.se wagnerguide.com kth-ch.primo.exlibrisgroup.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 0.0

AI trust scores for the domains kth.se links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to kth.se. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Kth",
  "url": "https://kth.se",
  "logo": "https://kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.1273705.1692876856!/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Kth",
  "url": "https://kth.se",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://kth.se/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Kth?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Kth does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Kth work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Kth."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for kth.se:

Current Score
69
Projected Score
85
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →