mongabay.com 70 B
🛡️ SEO 66 🤖 GEO 75 ⚡ Perf 65 🏗️ Arch 72

mongabay.com — Global SEODiff Score 70/100

mongabay.com
📊

mongabay.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 75/100, outperforming 81% of indexed domains. In the infrastructure sector, mongabay.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Content is delivered server-side, meaning bots and AI agents can parse the full page without executing JavaScript. A tight 4.0× token bloat ratio reflects disciplined markup: minimal noise between the crawler and the content it needs. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

70
B — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (65) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add HSTS header → +2 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 28 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than mongabay.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)66 × 0.25 = 16.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)75 × 0.40 = 30.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)65 × 0.20 = 13.0
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)72 × 0.15 = 10.8
Weighted sum = 16.5 + 30.0 + 13.0 + 10.8
Global SEODiff Score = 70 (B)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
25
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 1%
Rank #10417
+18 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 19%
Score 75/100

mongabay.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why mongabay.com ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat4.0×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

66/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

54 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

43 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 22
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 1
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://news.mongabay.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Mongabay - Conservation News
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

75/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
mongabay.com
57
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 25/100 — Low
Structured Elements 71 elements (71 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3784
Raw Density1.9%
💡Low structure score (25/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 71 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

63
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability63/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

25%
🗑️ 75%
Useful Content (36.6 KB)Bloat (109.5 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio4.0× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context57% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage21 / 37 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

25 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 75.0% · SNR: 0.33 · Signal: 9357 / Noise: 28038 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of mongabay.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Mongabay is an independent media organization providing global news and analysis on nature and planetary challenges through a network of local journalists.
Target Audience
Environmental journalists, researchers, policymakers, NGOs, and anyone seeking credible information on biodiversity loss, climate change, and related issues.
Pricing Model
Nonprofit; relies on donations and grants to sustain operations.
🏆 Competitive Moat
Extensive global network of local journalists providing unique on-the-ground reporting and data analysis, combined with a commitment to investigative journalism and a Creative Commons license for content reuse.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
RSS/XML feedsSocial media presence (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Mastodon, Bluesky)Creative Commons licensing
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Reliance on donations and grants for sustainability
• Potential for information gaps due to reliance on local sources
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time901 ms
Raw HTML Size146.1 KB
Visible Text Size36.6 KB

Performance & Speed

65/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

901 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1008
DOM nodes
146 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=600, must-revalidate
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

3
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
googletagmanager.comjs.hs-scripts.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

72/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://mongabay.com/sitemap_index.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

105
internal links
48
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 57/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for mongabay.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/mongabay.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=mongabay.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 94 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
57
Single-page score
-6
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
52
Avg across 94 pages · Range 0–90
Topical Cohesion
5%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
57176
Avg Bloat
50.3×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://mongabay.com/newsletter/newsletter-2021-12-09/
Newsletter 2021-12-09
pricing 90 4.4× 4471 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/newsletter/newsletter-2021-11-11/
Newsletter 2021-11-11
pricing 90 3.7× 6265 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/newsletter/newsletter-2021-11-18/
Newsletter 2021-11-18
pricing 90 4.4× 4458 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/terms/
Terms of Service
pricing 90 4.5× 3609 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/faq/
FAQ
pricing 85 9.0× 1556 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/faq
FAQ
pricing 85 9.0× 1556 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/rhett/
Rhett Butler
pricing 85 8.6× 2060 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/preguntas-frecuentes/
Preguntas frecuentes
pricing 85 9.0× 1573 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/rhett-butler/
Rhett Butler
pricing 85 9.3× 1651 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/privacy/
Privacy Policy
pricing 85 6.1× 2490 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/about
About Mongabay News
pricing 75 15.0× 864 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/about/
About Mongabay News
pricing 75 14.9× 864 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/list/deforestation/
Conservation news on Deforestation
pricing 75 13.4× 2008 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/copyright/
Copyright
pricing 75 10.3× 1299 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/2022/06/eus-anti-deforestation-bill-leaves-out-critical-ecosystems-study-shows/
%title%
pricing 75 10.9× 1491 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/testimonials/
Testimonials
pricing 72 14.7× 864 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/about-wildtech/
About Wildtech
pricing 72 18.5× 671 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/submissions/
Submissions
pricing 72 15.2× 844 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/about-wildtech/wildtech-the-need/
Wildtech - the intersection of conservation and technology
pricing 72 19.4× 636 💰 Pricing
https://mongabay.com/pressroom/
Pressroom
pricing 72 18.7× 735 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 94 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/rhett/ 7 50 0% 67.3× High JS Bloat
/copyright/ 5 58 0% 32.9× High JS Bloat
/events/ 4 49 0% 63.8× High JS Bloat
/2022/ 4 52 0% 63.3× High JS Bloat
/about/ 4 60 0% 34.4× High JS Bloat
/newsletter/ 4 81 0% 14.6× High JS Bloat
/contact/ 3 53 0% 40.6× High JS Bloat
/about-wildtech/ 3 72 0% 17.4× High JS Bloat
/podcast-2/ 2 49 0% 64.8× High JS Bloat
/faq/ 2 85 0% 9.0× High JS Bloat
/podcast/ 2 44 0% 74.2× High JS Bloat
/story-tips/ 2 44 0% 75.5× High JS Bloat
/opportunities/ 1 57 0% 23.0× High JS Bloat
/sobre/ 1 54 0% 33.0× High JS Bloat
/environmental-science-conservation-news/ 1 44 0% 66.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 94 pages
mongabay.org ×85
instagram.com ×84
linkedin.com ×84
mongabay.co.id ×81
es.mongabay.com ×81
hindi.mongabay.com ×81
india.mongabay.com ×81
news.mongabay.com ×81
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/mongabay.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to mongabay.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
mongabay.com (this site) 57 75 WordPress 4.0× 1
gifdb.com 82 88 WordPress 2.8× 1 Compare →
sirphire.com 82 90 WordPress 3.1× 2 Compare →
hikkoshi.suumo.jp 82 88 WordPress 2.2× 4 Compare →
mymc.jp 82 91 WordPress 4.4× 7 Compare →
nationalproductreview.com.au 82 98 WordPress 5.8× 13 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite mongabay.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 3 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

75
Homepage ACRI
71
Inner Avg ACRI
+4
ACRI Delta
0%
Homepage Ghost
10%
Inner Avg Ghost
5
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
57 20% support https://mongabay.com/contact
85 0% pricing https://mongabay.com/faq
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 30/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

36 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

56
Total Links
36
Unique Domains
18.7
Avg/Page
64%
Diversity
instagram.com linkedin.com mongabay.org mongabay.us14.list-manage.com fr.mongabay.com apple.news india.mongabay.com brasil.mongabay.com mongabay.co.id youtube.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 31.6

AI trust scores for the domains mongabay.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to mongabay.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Mongabay?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Mongabay does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Mongabay work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Mongabay."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for mongabay.com:

Current Score
75
Projected Score
78
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →