newrelic.com 66 C
🛡️ SEO 46 🤖 GEO 79 ⚡ Perf 41 🏗️ Arch 96

newrelic.com — Global SEODiff Score 66/100

newrelic.com
📊

newrelic.com shows strong AI visibility with an ACRI of 79/100, outperforming 91% of indexed domains. In the healthcare sector, newrelic.com outperforms the average (57), suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Server-side rendering keeps the ghost ratio near zero, giving AI systems direct access to all visible content. The token bloat ratio sits at a lean 3.6×, meaning the ratio of code to visible content is efficient — crawlers spend their token budget on actual information. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

66
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (41) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Monitor weekly to catch regressions early
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 20, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 13 snapshots
Mar 1 Mar 20
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 14 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
📈 Mar 11 ACRI +1 (65→66)
📈 Mar 7 ACRI +1 (64→65)
Does your site score higher than newrelic.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)46 × 0.25 = 11.5
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)79 × 0.40 = 31.6
⚡ Performance (20% weight)41 × 0.20 = 8.2
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)96 × 0.15 = 14.4
Weighted sum = 11.5 + 31.6 + 8.2 + 14.4
Global SEODiff Score = 66 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
54
Structure
avg 35
42
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #632
+9 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 9%
Score 79/100

newrelic.com shows stronger AI visibility than traditional SEO ranking. Great AI foundation to build on. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why newrelic.com ranks here

Tech stackDrupal
Industryhealthcare
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat3.6×

Fastest improvements

  • You’re already in decent shape — the next moat is monitoring drift over time.
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

46/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

24 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

157 chars
Good length

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 23
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://newrelic.com/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✅ Hreflang tags
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Observability built to understand AI
  • ✓ og:description — New Relic is an AI-powered observability platform that correlates your telemetry across your entire stack, so you can isolate the root cause and reduce MTTR.
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

79/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the healthcare sector, adwordsguide.com (ACRI: 86) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
newrelic.com
66
Your ACRI Score
86
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. adwordsguide.com has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 54/100 — Fair
Structured Elements 305 elements (305 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words3451
Raw Density8.8%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

72
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability72/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

27%
🗑️ 73%
Useful Content (186.5 KB)Bloat (493.0 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio3.6× — Lean

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context81% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage25 / 31 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

35 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 72.6% · SNR: 0.38 · Signal: 47752 / Noise: 126216 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of newrelic.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Full-Stack Observability helps engineers plan, build, deploy, and run great software.
Target Audience
Engineers, DevOps, Dev and Ops, technology teams
Pricing Model
Pay-as-you-go pricing of $0.40/GB
🏆 Competitive Moat
Unified data platform for all telemetry data—metrics, events, logs and traces.
📊 Content Depth
7/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
directory listingscomparison pagesAPI reference docs
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No meta descriptions
• Thin content on category pages
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkDrupal
AI-Readiness Score70/100
Server
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time533 ms
Raw HTML Size679.6 KB
Visible Text Size186.5 KB

Performance & Speed

41/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

533 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

4332
DOM nodes
680 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=31536000, public
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

96/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://newrelic.com/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

444
internal links
10
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 66/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for newrelic.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/newrelic.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=newrelic.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 1008 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
66
Single-page score
-2
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
64
Avg across 1008 pages · Range 0–85
Topical Cohesion
2%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
1639174
Avg Bloat
60.2×
RAG Fractures [?]
1005
⚠️
1005 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1005 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-5-ben-curtis
Observy McObservface Episode 5: Building a Badger: Developers All The Way Down with Ben Curtis | New Relic
pricing 85 8.0× 10963 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-6-untangling-the-mesh-observability-the-hard-way-with-kelsey-hightower
Observy McObservface Episode 6: Untangling The Mesh - Observability The Hard Way with Kelsey Hightower | New Relic
pricing 85 7.9× 9342 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-7-operating-with-agility-devops-for-days-with-matt-stratton
Observy McObservface Episode 7: Operating with Agility—DevOps for Days with Matt Stratton | New Relic
pricing 85 9.5× 9115 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-mando-escamilla
Observy McObservface Episode 8: Empathy is Magic—It's the Hope That Kills You, with Mando Escamilla | New Relic
pricing 85 9.7× 8952 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-tammy-bryant
Observy McObservface Episode 10: Gremlins and Banking—Questing Toward Chaos with Tammy Bryant | New Relic
pricing 85 9.5× 9049 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-4-wrench-fight-gobython-cncf-showdown
Observy McObservface Episode 4: Wrench Fight - Gobython & CNCF Showdown | New Relic
pricing 85 9.7× 8863 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-no-2-alex-ellis
Observy McObservface Episode No. 2: Alex Ellis, CNCF Ambassador | New Relic
pricing 75 10.2× 8312 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-quintessence-anx
Observy McObservface Episode 15: Pens, Pages, and Pain – Taming Alert Storms with Quintessence Anx | New Relic
pricing 75 10.7× 7888 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-nell-shamrell-harrington
Observy McObservface Episode 14: Weaponized IP - Licenses, Trademarks, and Kindness with Nell Shamrell-Harrington | New Relic
pricing 75 10.2× 8258 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-austin-parker
Observy McObservface Episode 9: Opening The Island—OpenTelemetry and The Future of Observability with Austin Parker | New Relic
pricing 75 11.9× 7061 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-kat-cosgrove
Observy McObservface Episode 13: Donkeys and Coffee Cats–Driving Community and Open Source with Kat Cosgrove | New Relic
pricing 75 10.3× 8196 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-tim-banks
Observy McObservface Episode 12: Choking Strangers–Humans, Software, and Priorities with Tim Banks | New Relic
pricing 75 10.9× 7639 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-anne-dalton
Observy McObservface Episode 11: Getting S.M.A.R.T.–Brains, Burn-in, and Bending Toward Cloud with Anne Dalton | New Relic
pricing 75 12.2× 6851 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-pixie-labs
Observy McObservface Episode 17: Space Pixies Kernel Instrumentation and the Future of Observability with Zain Asgar and Ishan Mukherjee of Pixie Labs | New Relic
pricing 75 12.2× 6795 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-katy-farmer
Observy McObservface Episode 16: Marshmallows and Tutus–Building Communities That Thrive With Katy Farmer | New Relic
pricing 75 10.0× 8463 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/futurestack-2022-recap
FutureStack 2022 Recap | New Relic
pricing 72 22.6× 4234 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/observability/monitoring-gorm
Monitoring Your Go Database | New Relic
pricing 72 34.0× 2371 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-episode-3-bobby-tables
Observy McObservface Episode 3 - Firefighting and DevOps: The Platypus Incident | New Relic
pricing 72 14.6× 5602 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/news/observy-mcobservface-interview-chief-product-officer-bill-staples
A New Podcast Has Entered The Game: Observy McObservface | New Relic
pricing 72 13.4× 6148 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://newrelic.com/blog/observability/microservices-modern-software-podcast
The Modern Software Podcast: All About Microservices | New Relic
pricing 72 15.4× 5304 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 499 66 0% 52.4× High JS Bloat
/pricing/ 1 69 0% 35.9× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 1008 pages
github.com ×1005
one.newrelic.com ×1005
twitter.com ×1004
youtube.com ×1001
linkedin.com ×1001
docs.newrelic.com ×1000
facebook.com ×1000
twitch.tv ×998
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/newrelic.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar healthcare Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to newrelic.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
newrelic.com (this site) 66 79 Drupal 3.6× 1
chemistop.com 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.5× 1 Compare →
volunteerforever.com 80 88 WordPress 4.8× 1 Compare →
blogs.juniper.net 82 88 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
jobs.aveanna.com 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 1 Compare →
medisave.co.uk 80 89 Shopify 3.7× 2 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite newrelic.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

D 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

69
Homepage ACRI
53
Inner Avg ACRI
+16
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
40%
Inner Avg Ghost
54
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
54 40% pricing https://newrelic.com/about
64 40% pricing https://newrelic.com/products
54 40% pricing https://newrelic.com/blog
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 50/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Address: 1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2000, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA Map Portland 111 SW 5th Ave
🔗

Citation Profile

21 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

192
Total Links
21
Unique Domains
12.8
Avg/Page
11%
Diversity
learn.newrelic.com youtube.com one.newrelic.com support.newrelic.com github.com linkedin.com docs.newrelic.com facebook.com twitter.com twitch.tv
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 41.4

AI trust scores for the domains newrelic.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to newrelic.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Newrelic?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Newrelic does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Newrelic work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Newrelic."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for newrelic.com:

Current Score
79
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →