sankei.com 61 C
🛡️ SEO 63 🤖 GEO 60 ⚡ Perf 39 🏗️ Arch 89

sankei.com — Global SEODiff Score 61/100

sankei.com
📊

sankei.com achieves a 74/100 on the AI-Crawler Reality Index, reflecting above-average readiness for AI-driven discovery. Within the social vertical, this places sankei.com above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. While the majority of content is server-rendered, the 30% ghost ratio suggests some content remains hidden from static crawlers. The bloated 34.1× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. The site includes 2 schema blocks, providing adequate structured data for basic entity recognition. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

61
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Performance (39) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (34×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
Does your site score higher than sankei.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)63 × 0.25 = 15.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)60 × 0.40 = 24.0
⚡ Performance (20% weight)39 × 0.20 = 7.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 15.8 + 24.0 + 7.8 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 61 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
86
Structure
avg 35
4
Schema
avg 9
50
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.6%
Rank #5864
+22 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 22%
Score 74/100

sankei.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why sankei.com ranks here

Tech stackCustom / Proprietary
Industrysocial
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage2 blocks
Token bloat34.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

63/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

18 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

183 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 39
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 産経ニュース
  • ✓ og:description — 産経新聞社のニュースサイト。政治、経済、国際、社会、スポーツ、エンタメ、災害情報などの速報記事と解説記事を掲載しています。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

60/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the social sector, martin-sad.ru (ACRI: 87) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
sankei.com
56
Your ACRI Score
87
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. martin-sad.ru has schema coverage of 63 blocks and uses Custom / Proprietary. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 34.1x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 86/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 93 elements (93 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words417
Raw Density22.3%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks2 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

2/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
✅ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

51
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability51/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (80/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

2%
🗑️ 98%
Useful Content (13.1 KB)Bloat (433.9 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio34.1× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context94% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage63 / 67 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 447.0 KB, but only 13.1 KB is text. 2% useful / 98% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (34.1×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 97.1% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 3356 / Noise: 111077 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of sankei.com and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
This SaaS platform provides a collaborative project management solution for distributed teams, focusing on sprint planning and resource optimization through AI.
Target Audience
Engineering managers, product managers, scrum masters, and project managers working in agile environments.
Pricing Model
Subscription-based, with tiered pricing based on team size and features (details not specified).
🔗 Integration Partners
SlackGitHubJira
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sprint planning and real-time resource optimization, offering predictive insights and automated task allocation.
📊 Content Depth
6/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pages
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of detailed feature descriptions in the text
• Limited information on specific pricing tiers
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

AI-Readiness Score50/100
Serveropenresty
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1111 ms
Raw HTML Size447.0 KB
Visible Text Size13.1 KB

Performance & Speed

39/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1111 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1908
DOM nodes
447 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → private, max-age=60
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

2
tracker scripts
2
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.netoutbrain.com
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.sankei.com/feeds/sitemapindex-category/?outputType=xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

241
internal links
6
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ja
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 56/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for sankei.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/sankei.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=sankei.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 212 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
56
Single-page score
-18
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
39
Avg across 212 pages · Range 0–61
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 56, but internal pages average only 39 — a -18-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
25202
Avg Bloat
321.1×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260227-4OFO3ZGIPJBM5ENKKXNLAYPAXY/
「#ママ戦争止めてくるわ」に高市首相と小泉防衛相「思い同じ」 平和のための抑止力強調 - 産経ニュース
pricing 61 87.3× 785 💰 Pricing
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-EVZDJVSJZBANXN7Y4DVXWAX5RU/
中道落選者ヒアリングに170人 公明出身の比例名簿上位に不満、合流を疑問視する声も - 産経ニュース
pricing 61 88.7× 786 💰 Pricing
https://sankei.com/terms
利用規約(2025.09-) - 産経ニュース
legal 47 185.1× 127
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260227-VFUYY6NMJZJWDA5HDFUWFNLCRY/
金融界に汚点残す顧客強盗殺人未遂・放火事件 野村証券元社員が法廷で語った身勝手な弁明 - 産経ニュース
blog 44 296.9× 168
https://sankei.com/help
無料・有料プランのご案内 - 産経ニュース
pricing 44 293.0× 153 💰 Pricing
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260227-ECXM2SN5LJM4JOFXWMB4MLMP6Y/
長野・佐久市立病院の贈収賄、元整形外科部長らに有罪判決 医療機器選定で現金受領 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 353.2× 117
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260301-DQWYBEUZKRNE5IBVTWDLXM55DM/
茨城の利根川で男性の不明遺体発見 身長160センチ 黒のトレーナーに紺のジーパン着用 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 332.8× 123
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-X7Q4XG6ATNOMHF7LRRQMTHAPNQ/
海自ヘリから部品2個なくなる 飛行訓練で落下か、被害情報なし 長崎 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 331.3× 124
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-II4Z7SYGCBKCTAYQFJWLLW6M74/
長野・新潟県境のスキー場で雪崩 5人巻き込まれ救助、命に別条なし - 産経ニュース
blog 41 341.0× 118
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-XR3H2HCZ6FOH7CI6NBSMCXKFW4/
酒気帯び疑いで松山市職員逮捕 信号待ちの軽乗用車に追突 基準値4倍のアルコール検出 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 333.1× 124
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-FTDJPI5MHZL2ZINQIVBFMZCBZM/
インド人に資格外業務、5年以上常態化か 埼玉の野菜加工会社…描かれた不法就労の構図 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 311.9× 140
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-DCWYEI75XVPTRLCQRQGJSGTMNQ/
小学館「マンガワン」編集者の性加害示談関与「業界の信頼に関わる問題」漫画家協会が声明 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 346.3× 120
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260227-I4ZE6KHFDVMYJDDWM6VZIOAU7U/
神戸市北区女児死亡事件 出産した母親を傷害致死罪などで起訴 神戸地検 「赤ちゃんポスト」の慈恵病院院長は懸念 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 323.2× 128
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-63QSM6LUQ5NFVFNOUVP5DMKV6I/
「人権コンプラ意識欠如あった」小学館が調査委設置へ「マンガワン」編集者性加害示談関与 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 348.2× 119
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-WHTQ4TIJ3VNTHL4L6SAABVUHFI/
スノーモービルが横転か、女児死亡 長野・白馬 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 349.2× 116
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-MQXG53WL6RJ55ENKOJOMLBIU5E/
教育現場の闇 性問題で処分教員281人、被害半数は「自校の教え子」対策しても残る死角 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 341.8× 135
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-Q7NRGBG4QJLRXG2I7RV7NZST7I/
兵庫県豊岡市の山中で実証実験中のドローン墜落 日本郵便が県、市との連携協定延期 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 342.2× 121
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-OFXTQM7YQFLZXMSYRB3Q5QLMEM/
5歳男児が意識不明重体、傷害容疑で母の知人36歳男を逮捕「事故」と否認 千葉・船橋 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 344.6× 120
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-WJUOZWNGEBKQ5PUBOMAKVJRI5U/
2歳女児死亡、母親と降車直後にひき逃げか 容疑でタクシー運転手を逮捕 北海道・旭川 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 328.4× 126
https://www.sankei.com/article/20260228-R2UQIUM2UNKOXMOPI7HEJBBXVY/
「両親を殺してしまった」殺人の疑いで50代の男を逮捕 集合住宅で高齢の男女2人が死亡 - 産経ニュース
blog 41 340.9× 122
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/article/ 196 41 1% 344.1× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/solutions/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 26 0% 151.6× High JS Bloat
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/terms/ 1 47 0% 185.1× High JS Bloat
/about/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/privacy/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/careers/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 212 pages
id.sankei.jp ×198
reader.sankei.co.jp ×197
line.me ×196
x.com ×196
threads.net ×196
youtube.com ×196
bsky.app ×196
facebook.com ×196
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/sankei.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar social Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to sankei.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
sankei.com (this site) 56 74 Custom / Proprietary 34.1× 2
smaker.pl 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.9× 2 Compare →
wertpapier-forum.de 80 86 Custom / Proprietary 4.6× 2 Compare →
conrad.ba 81 86 Custom / Proprietary 3.4× 2 Compare →
otoclubturkiye.com 80 87 Custom / Proprietary 4.5× 3 Compare →
forum.astrakhan.ru 80 87 Custom / Proprietary 5.5× 3 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite sankei.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

B 3 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

26
Homepage ACRI
46
Inner Avg ACRI
-20
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
30%
Inner Avg Ghost
18
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
44 40% pricing https://sankei.com/help
47 20% legal https://sankei.com/terms
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

5 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

7
Total Links
5
Unique Domains
2.3
Avg/Page
71%
Diversity
help.sankei.com id.sankei.jp sankei.jp reader.sankei.co.jp denshi.sankei.co.jp
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 0.0

AI trust scores for the domains sankei.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to sankei.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Sankei",
  "url": "https://sankei.com",
  "logo": "https://sankei.com/pf/resources/icons/favicon.ico?d=1109",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 2% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Sankei?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Sankei does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Sankei work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Sankei."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for sankei.com:

Current Score
74
Projected Score
88
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →