storm.mg 44 D
🛡️ SEO 29 🤖 GEO 52 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 62

storm.mg — Global SEODiff Score 44/100

storm.mg
📊

storm.mg currently sits at 63/100 on the ACRI scale, an average result that suggests several quick wins remain untapped. Within the infrastructure vertical, this places storm.mg above the industry average of 57 —, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. Its server-rendered architecture ensures AI crawlers receive complete HTML on first request, a key advantage for extractability. A 31.3× token bloat ratio means crawlers must process significantly more tokens to reach the actual content — a drag on extraction efficiency. Minimal structured data (1 block) limits the site's ability to communicate entity relationships to AI systems. Robots.txt grants unrestricted access to the key AI user-agents, which is the strongest starting position for AI visibility.

44
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (29) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (31×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 21 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 21 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 20 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 19 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 18 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than storm.mg?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)29 × 0.25 = 7.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)52 × 0.40 = 20.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)62 × 0.15 = 9.3
Weighted sum = 7.2 + 20.8 + 6.8 + 9.3
Global SEODiff Score = 44 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
99
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
2
Schema
avg 9
80
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.7%
Rank #7216
+48 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 48%
Score 63/100

storm.mg punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why storm.mg ranks here

Tech stackNuxt.js
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat31.3×

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

29/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

20 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

255 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 17
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.storm.mg
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — 風傳媒|Storm.mg
  • ✓ og:description — 風傳媒,是一個有國際視野、觀點犀利、正向力量的新媒體。我們以最宏觀的視野掌握國際、國內的新聞、政治、兩岸動態,提供最優秀的原生新聞,讓使用者能看見最公正、真實的新聞內容。
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

52/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the infrastructure sector, safely.co.jp (ACRI: 90) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
storm.mg
33
Your ACRI Score
90
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. safely.co.jp has schema coverage of 3 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 5%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1176
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 0 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

1/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
✅ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

28
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability28/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (29.5 KB)Bloat (894.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio31.3× — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context3% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage6 / 234 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 924.3 KB, but only 29.5 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (31.3×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 3% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.8% · SNR: 0.03 · Signal: 7555 / Noise: 229076 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkNuxt.js
AI-Readiness Score80/100
Servernginx
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1714 ms
Raw HTML Size924.3 KB
Visible Text Size29.5 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1714 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2972
DOM nodes
924 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✗ Cache-Control header
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

1
tracker scripts
1
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
doubleclick.net
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

62/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.storm.mg/sitemaps/1/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

719
internal links
38
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → zh-Hant-TW
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 33/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for storm.mg
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/storm.mg" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=storm.mg" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 602 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
33
Single-page score
+27
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
60
Avg across 602 pages · Range 0–66
Topical Cohesion
38%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
545091
Avg Bloat
148.4×
RAG Fractures [?]
1
⚠️
1 RAG-Chunking Fracture Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 1 page will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105724
學測放榜壓力山大 志願怎麼填 上配配找答案 | 楊艾喬 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 145.8× 1103 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105553
花蓮太平洋聯合豐年節狂奪「國際金獎」,縣府加碼曝:今年擴大連辦4天,搶票搶房戰提早開打 | 溫佳身 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 152.8× 957 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105734
茶控失控!亞尼克聯手600年「堀井七茗園」 17款宇治雙茶甜點震撼登場 | 唐可欣 | 品味生活 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 145.1× 1094 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106283
高雄不等人口回升才轉型!TOD直攻產業升級與城市重構 雙軸戰略 | 徐炳文 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 158.7× 957 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105915
即戰力無縫接軌職場!輔英科大首批新南向長照人才投入實習就業 | 徐炳文 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 155.0× 991 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105705
姚淑文領軍出擊 北市社會局17項新政全面加碼 要讓幸福臺北更有溫度 | 陳又嘉 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 145.8× 1189 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105955
Gogoro今年有什麼計畫?執行長姜家煒:第一代電池全面退役、再推3款新車 | 劉芯衣 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 171.2× 988 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106276
苗栗藍莓3月新鮮登場 「豐味苗栗」打造「紫色經濟」新亮點 | 王秀禾 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 152.5× 977 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105803
林文寶觀點:從《陽光女子合唱團》到《大濛》─國片榮景是真復甦抑或曇花一現? | 林文寶 | 評論 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 167.0× 949 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106301
輝達端超強財報,為何股價冷清清?專家揭晶片不再是主角:市場在看這類股 | 黃律齊 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 162.5× 966 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106032
台灣人均資產贏過日、韓?專家曝3大殘酷真相:連外國人都認證的矛盾經濟特徵 | 張庭維 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 151.3× 1206 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106023
二戰後最慘烈的東歐長夜:朝鮮派兵入侵、川普無情抽手,烏克蘭如何在強權夾縫中求生 | 德國之聲 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 163.1× 1068 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106017
中國人形機器人重演低價殺戮戰?謝金河曝「這項關鍵零件」價格跌9成:內捲風暴來襲 | 張庭維 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 158.6× 1108 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105717
何啟聖觀點:在新威權論述之下─從賈永婕現象談話語權力與資源配置 | 何啟聖 | 評論 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 164.1× 964 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11105613
記憶體狂潮後,下個飆漲族群是它?阮慕驊點名3台廠:未來將形成爭食局面 | 張庭維 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 153.5× 1114 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106229
搶攻中間選民!黃暐瀚讚藍營3大咖出手了:國民黨知道不能再這樣下去 | 李孟恩 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 161.9× 961 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106313
台美關稅15%白談了?蔡正元曝川普新政策最慘影響:232優惠跟台灣毫無關係 | 黃律齊 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 165.8× 949 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106216
ASML助攻台積電ADR飆漲?EUV效能進化「吞大力丸」 專家:台廠供應鏈等分紅 | 黃律齊 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 164.5× 967 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106286
AMD拿下Meta AI晶片大單!1.6億股認股權證成焦點 蘇姿丰:將扮演全球AI基建關鍵角色 | 魏鑫陽 | 新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 160.6× 997 💰 Pricing
https://www.storm.mg/article/11106339
蘭花×科技雙展齊發!賴清德出席揭幕 2026臺灣國際蘭展登場 | 徐炳文 | 地方新聞 - 風傳媒
pricing 66 159.0× 1025 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/article/ 346 64 1% 158.4× Bot Blocked
/lifestyle/ 112 64 1% 154.9× Bot Blocked
/channel/ 41 53 1% 120.8× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 51 1% 102.2× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 602 pages
onepercent.storm.mg ×594
news.google.com ×594
new7.storm.mg ×594
t.me ×594
youtube.com ×594
x.com ×594
instagram.com ×594
facebook.com ×594
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/storm.mg

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar infrastructure Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to storm.mg. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
storm.mg (this site) 33 63 Nuxt.js 31.3× 1
teampeterstigter.com 58 80 WordPress 19.5× 1 Compare →
duniafilm.lol 58 78 WordPress 18.4× 1 Compare →
phdiscover.jp 58 90 WordPress 16.2× 1 Compare →
toriamos.com 58 88 WordPress 14.8× 1 Compare →
teamhood.com 58 81 WordPress 66.7× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite storm.mg when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

C 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

46
Homepage ACRI
61
Inner Avg ACRI
-15
ACRI Delta
40%
Homepage Ghost
81%
Inner Avg Ghost
31
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
47 90% pricing https://www.storm.mg/article/11106148
62 90% pricing https://www.storm.mg/article/11105658
62 90% pricing https://www.storm.mg/article/11105656
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 35/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
Named leadership: 周幸容, 張大任, 黃天如
🔗

Citation Profile

24 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

198
Total Links
24
Unique Domains
13.2
Avg/Page
12%
Diversity
japan.storm.mg news.google.com instagram.com t.me x.com page.line.me 104.com.tw events.storm.mg new7.storm.mg onepercent.storm.mg
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 35.5

AI trust scores for the domains storm.mg links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to storm.mg. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Storm",
  "url": "https://storm.mg",
  "logo": "https://storm.mg/img/touch-icon-retina.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Storm?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Storm does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Storm work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Storm."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for storm.mg:

Current Score
63
Projected Score
77
Improvement
+14 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →