tbank.ru 56 D
🛡️ SEO 53 🤖 GEO 62 ⚡ Perf 34 🏗️ Arch 74

tbank.ru — Global SEODiff Score 56/100

tbank.ru
📋 Executive Audit

Т-Банк (tbank.ru) operates as a financial services provider offering credit and debit cards, personal and business loans, positioned within the competitive fintech landscape. The domain holds a Global SEODiff Score of 56, placing it below the benchmark for top-tier financial institutions, with an ACRI Grade of C and an ACRI Score of 62, indicating moderate search visibility performance. While the site demonstrates strong structural foundations—evidenced by a high Architecture Score of 74 and robust internal linking (434 internal links)—its performance and content delivery present critical challenges that limit visibility and user engagement.

The site excels in semantic structure (82) and AI-readiness (62), showing strong alignment with modern search engine expectations through clear content organization and open bot access. However, significant technical inefficiencies hinder performance: TTFB of 1,700ms, 1.2MB HTML payload, and a 30% ghost ratio—indicating a substantial portion of rendered content is non-essential. The token bloat ratio of 60.0x and only 20,536 useful text bytes suggest severe content dilution, with excessive code and markup overwhelming core messaging. These issues contribute to a Performance Score of 34, severely impacting both user experience and search engine crawling efficiency.

Architecturally, the site benefits from a declared sitemap and strong internal link structure, but lacks critical schema types such as FAQ, Article, and Breadcrumb, reducing rich result potential. While Organization and Product schema are present, the absence of Website and Breadcrumb schema limits entity clarity. The AI Trust Score of 7.5/10 reflects strong bot accessibility and transparency, but performance bottlenecks and poor content density undermine its ability to fully leverage AI-driven search opportunities. Prioritizing content cleanup, TTFB optimization, and schema enrichment would yield the highest return on SEO investment.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
56
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Performance (34) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (61×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 15, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 2 snapshots
Mar 7 Mar 15
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than tbank.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)53 × 0.25 = 13.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)62 × 0.40 = 24.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)34 × 0.20 = 6.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)74 × 0.15 = 11.1
Weighted sum = 13.2 + 24.8 + 6.8 + 11.1
Global SEODiff Score = 56 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
94
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.2%
Rank #1801
Aligned
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 1%
Score 88/100

tbank.ru has balanced Google and AI visibility — both rank roughly in the same tier. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tbank.ru ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryfinance
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

53/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

155 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

290 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 9
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.tbank.ru
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Т‑Банк — финансовые услуги для физических и юридических лиц
  • ✓ og:description — Лучший банк 2024 года по версии Банки.ру. Входит в топ-5 лучших цифровых банков мира в 2025 году по версии TABInsights
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

62/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, cardpay.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tbank.ru
62
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. cardpay.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 60.6x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 94/100 — Excellent
Structured Elements 395 elements (395 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1484
Raw Density26.6%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

71
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability71/100 — AI models can easily extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (20.5 KB)Bloat (1221.8 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context6% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage2 / 34 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1242.3 KB, but only 20.5 KB is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.
💡Only 6% of images have alt text. Add descriptive alt attributes so multimodal AI (ChatGPT Vision) can understand your images.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 98.3% · SNR: 0.02 · Signal: 5248 / Noise: 312792 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of tbank.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
A cloud-based speech analytics platform that analyzes customer interactions across various channels (phone, chat, etc.) to improve customer experience, increase revenue, and reduce churn.
Target Audience
Customer service managers, sales managers, marketing managers, call center supervisors, business analysts
Pricing Model
Free trial (500 minutes), paid tiers based on usage (up to 2000 chats or 500 minutes of conversations)
🔗 Integration Partners
CRM-системыТелефонияАудиобейджиРешения для чатов
🏆 Competitive Moat
AI-powered sentiment analysis and root cause identification, combined with a comprehensive reporting and task management system.
📊 Content Depth
8/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
Integration directory pagesTemplate comparison pagesBlog posts about use cases (e.g., ‘How to increase sales’, ‘How to analyze call center work’)
⚡ Key Pain Points
• Lack of structured FAQ schema
• Thin landing pages for features
• Difficulty identifying root causes of customer dissatisfaction
• Manual analysis of large volumes of data
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerMSX Turbo R (R900) Web Server 1.13
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time1452 ms
Raw HTML Size1242.3 KB
Visible Text Size20.5 KB

Performance & Speed

34/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

1452 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

2319
DOM nodes
1242 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

74/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.tbank.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

433
internal links
13
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 62/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for tbank.ru
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tbank.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tbank.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 639 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
62
Single-page score
-14
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
48
Avg across 639 pages · Range 0–66
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 62, but internal pages average only 48 — a -14-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Total Words
311580
Avg Bloat
473.0×
RAG Fractures [?]
3
⚠️
3 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 3 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/tinkoff-id/partnership/
T‑ID для идентификация пользователей на сайтах и в приложениях
support 66 234.6× 795
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/about/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 123.5× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/management/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/start/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/setup/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 123.5× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics-for-tinkoff/control/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/business-payments/internet-acquiring/splitting/
Безопасная сделка и сплитование платежей | Сервис безопасных сделок
support 66 159.0× 1159
https://www.tbank.ru/software/speech-analytics/insights/
Insights — инструмент Речевой аналитики для исследований клиентов
blog 66 181.7× 907
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/setup/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 123.5× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/control/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/about/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 123.5× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/start/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/help/solutions/speech-analytics/management/
Речевая аналитика для контакт-центра | Речевая аналитика звонков
support 66 124.4× 1666
https://www.tbank.ru/business/registration-ip/service/
Частые вопросы при регистрации ИП
product 66 152.7× 1029
https://www.tbank.ru/mobile-operator/features/fraud-protection/
Телефонная защита от мошенников — Т‑Мобайл
pricing 66 170.7× 575 💰 Pricing
https://www.tbank.ru/bank/help/credit-cards/drive/onboarding/
Как пользоваться кредитной картой Drive
pricing 64 43.5× 3040 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://www.tbank.ru/bank/help/credit-cards/lukoil/onboarding/
Как пользоваться кредитной картой «ЛУКОЙЛ — Т‑Банк»
pricing 64 44.9× 2900 💰 Pricing
https://www.tbank.ru/bank/help/credit-cards/tinkoff-platinum/onboarding/
Как пользоваться кредитной картой «Платинум»
pricing 64 46.5× 2656 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/bank/ 308 52 1% 428.3× Bot Blocked
/business/ 92 55 1% 302.2× Bot Blocked
/invest/ 53 51 1% 383.3× Bot Blocked
/mobile-operator/ 16 51 1% 467.7× Bot Blocked
/insurance/ 12 51 1% 436.3× Bot Blocked
/software/ 9 50 1% 347.1× Bot Blocked
/help/ 5 53 1% 294.1× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 43 1% 365.4× Bot Blocked
/travel/ 1 43 1% 528.3× Bot Blocked
/gorod/ 1 64 0% 67.5× High JS Bloat
/blog/ 1 50 1% 536.5× Bot Blocked
/savings/ 1 42 1% 430.9× Bot Blocked
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tbank.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tbank.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tbank.ru (this site) 62 88 Express 60.6× 1
digitalnewstoday.in 78 82 WordPress 4.6× 1 Compare →
trustonefinancial.org 78 89 WordPress 7.0× 1 Compare →
itiviti.com 78 85 Custom / Proprietary 2.6× 1 Compare →
aex.nl 79 82 Drupal 3.4× 1 Compare →
vogate.com 79 84 WordPress 3.3× 1 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tbank.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

D 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

43
Homepage ACRI
45
Inner Avg ACRI
-2
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
61%
Inner Avg Ghost
46
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
50 70% blog https://tbank.ru/blog
53 60% blog https://www.tbank.ru/software/speech-analytics/blog/articles/business-value/
43 60% blog https://www.tbank.ru/software/speech-analytics/blog/cases/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 35/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

17 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

179
Total Links
17
Unique Domains
11.9
Avg/Page
10%
Diversity
t-technologies.ru cdn.tbank.ru business.tbank.ru ok.ru promokod.tbank.ru vk.com education.tbank.ru t.me secrets.tbank.ru partners.tbank.ru
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 23.8

AI trust scores for the domains tbank.ru links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tbank.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Tbank",
  "url": "https://tbank.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tbank.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 1% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Tbank?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Tbank does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Tbank work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Tbank."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tbank.ru:

Current Score
88
Projected Score
100
Improvement
+12 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

7.5
AI-Trust
#567
Global Rank
68%
Percentile
34
Inbound AI Links
17
Outbound AI Links
52
Avg Inbound ACRI
9%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
hcsalavat.ru 70 0.0 ← cites you
fhr.ru 67 0.0 ← cites you
hawk.ru 60 0.0 ← cites you
hcdinamo.by 60 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-major.ru 60 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-autoprodix.ru 59 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-borishof.ru 59 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-panavto.ru 58 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-bovid-chelyabinsk.ru 58 0.0 ← cites you
voyah-its.ru 58 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →