blender.org 64 C
🛡️ SEO 40 🤖 GEO 67 ⚡ Perf 74 🏗️ Arch 84

blender.org — Global SEODiff Score 64/100

blender.org
📊

The AI-Readiness profile for blender.org is strong: an ACRI of 76/100 places it ahead of 83% of domains in the index. Compared to other news sites (avg score: 57), blender.org performs above the benchmark, suggesting strong competitive positioning in AI search. The low ghost ratio (0%) confirms that what crawlers see matches what users see — a hallmark of strong SSR implementation. A 9.2× bloat ratio is typical for sites in this tech tier — not wasteful, but streamlining could further boost extractability. No structured data was detected, which means AI systems must infer all entities and relationships from raw HTML alone. All major AI bot user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot, Google-Extended) are permitted by robots.txt, ensuring broad AI crawler access.

64
C — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Strong foundations, but Traditional SEO (40) is your bottleneck.
🎯 Top Fix: Add Organization + WebSite JSON-LD → +5–8 pts
⚠️ Crawl Blocked: Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 13, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 28 snapshots
Feb 22 Mar 13
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 13 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 11 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 9 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than blender.org?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)40 × 0.25 = 10.0
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)67 × 0.40 = 26.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)74 × 0.20 = 14.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)84 × 0.15 = 12.6
Weighted sum = 10.0 + 26.8 + 14.8 + 12.6
Global SEODiff Score = 64 (C)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
100
Rendering
avg 93
64
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
85
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.5%
Rank #4567
+17 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 17%
Score 76/100

blender.org punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why blender.org ranks here

Tech stackWordPress
Industrynews
RenderingSSR
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat9.2×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

⚠️ Crawl Failed: Anti-Bot Protection Detected

Fetch failed (network timeout / connection error)

The scores below may not reflect actual site quality. The crawler received a challenge page instead of real content.

🛡️

Traditional SEO

40/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

71 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

21 chars
Too short

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 6
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.blender.org/
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Blender - The Free and Open Source 3D Creation Software — blender.org
  • ✓ og:description — The Freedom to Create
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

67/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the news sector, medi.de (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
blender.org
33
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. medi.de has schema coverage of 4 blocks and uses TYPO3. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 0%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type SSR

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 64/100 — Good
Structured Elements 98 elements (98 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words806
Raw Density12.2%

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

55
AI Extractability
Low
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability55/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostLow (30/100) — efficient for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

10%
🗑️ 90%
Useful Content (11.6 KB)Bloat (95.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio9.2× — Normal

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context68% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage19 / 28 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 89.1% · SNR: 0.12 · Signal: 2980 / Noise: 24359 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of blender.org and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
Open source 3D creation software
Target Audience
3D artists, animators, designers
Pricing Model
Freemium
🏆 Competitive Moat
Open source with extensive community contributions
📊 Content Depth
5/10
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-28

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkWordPress
AI-Readiness Score85/100
Servercloudflare
CDNcloudflare
HTTP Status200
Load Time878 ms
Raw HTML Size106.8 KB
Visible Text Size11.6 KB

Performance & Speed

74/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

878 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

535
DOM nodes
107 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=2772, public
  • ✓ CDN cache status → DYNAMIC
  • ✓ CDN detected → cloudflare

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

84/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.blender.org/wp-sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

105
internal links
23
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site is currently blocking AI crawlers. Unblock them and rescan to earn your AI-Verified badge.

AI-Verified badge for blender.org
Unverified — crawl access is blocked
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/blender.org" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=blender.org" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 314 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
33
Single-page score
+25
Subpages outperform homepage
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
58
Avg across 314 pages · Range 0–85
Topical Cohesion
16%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
267679
Avg Bloat
29.9×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://www.blender.org/news/points-of-view-on-blender-angela-plohman/
Points of view on Blender: Angela Plohman — Blender
other 85 6.5× 2496
https://www.blender.org/press/blender-projects-in-2018-to-look-forward-to/
Blender projects in 2018 to look forward to — Blender
other 85 7.8× 1702
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/japanese-anime-studio-khara-moving-to-blender/
Japanese anime studio Khara moving to Blender — Blender
other 85 7.2× 1922
https://www.blender.org/news/points-of-view-on-blender-nicolas-schmerkin/
Points of view on Blender: Nicolas Schmerkin — Blender
other 85 6.8× 2740
https://www.blender.org/news/points-of-view-on-blender-jon-peddie/
Points of view on Blender: Jon Peddie — Blender
other 85 7.0× 2303
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/the-future-of-storyboarding-blender-for-pre-production/
The Future Of Storyboarding: Blender For Pre-Production — Blender
product 85 9.1× 2191
https://www.blender.org/development/the-top-30-blender-developers-2016/
The top 30 Blender developers 2016 — Blender
docs 85 9.3× 1597
https://www.blender.org/news/points-of-view-on-blender-jono-bacon/
Points of view on Blender: Jono Bacon — Blender
other 85 7.4× 2154
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/making-flow-an-interview-with-director-gints-zilbalodis/
Making Flow – Interview with director Gints Zilbalodis — Blender
other 85 7.0× 2482
https://www.blender.org/development/top-20-blender-developers-in-2020/
Top 20 Blender Developers In 2020 — Blender
docs 85 9.9× 1816
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/creating-il-baracchino-italys-first-adult-animated-series-made-with-blender/
Creating “Il Baracchino”: Italy’s First Adult Animated Series Made with Blender — Blender
other 85 7.8× 2210
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/visual-effects-for-the-man-in-the-high-castle/
Visual Effects for The Man in the High Castle — Blender
other 85 6.7× 1922
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/rochlitz-vr/
Rochlitz VR — Blender
other 85 8.0× 1635
https://www.blender.org/press/blender-top-16-highlights-of-2019/
Blender top 16 highlights of 2019 — Blender
other 85 7.3× 1966
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/blender-and-the-rabbids/
Blender and the Rabbids — Blender
other 85 8.1× 2397
https://www.blender.org/user-stories/2d-isnt-dead-it-just-became-something-different-using-blender-for-wolfwalkers/
“2D Isn’t Dead, It Just Became Something Different”: Using Blender For Wolfwalkers — Blender
other 85 8.6× 2113
https://www.blender.org/development/top-20-blender-developers-2013/
Top 20 Blender developers 2013 — Blender
docs 85 7.8× 1735
https://www.blender.org/press/18-anticipated-blender-development-projects-of-2015/
18 anticipated Blender development projects of 2015 — Blender
other 85 7.2× 1901
https://www.blender.org/media-exposure/siggraph-2016-report/
SIGGRAPH 2016 report — Blender
other 85 6.3× 2148
https://www.blender.org/press/blender-top-15-highlights-of-2018/
Blender top 15 highlights of 2018 — Blender
other 85 8.4× 1645
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/press/ 100 58 0% 33.5× High JS Bloat
/download/ 52 62 0% 21.6× High JS Bloat
/news/ 47 59 0% 35.1× High JS Bloat
/user-stories/ 26 74 0% 15.8× High JS Bloat
/about/ 15 58 0% 26.4× High JS Bloat
/development/ 14 75 0% 14.2× High JS Bloat
/features/ 13 45 0% 45.5× High JS Bloat
/author/ 8 41 0% 59.9× High JS Bloat
/media-exposure/ 8 59 0% 35.7× High JS Bloat
/events/ 7 53 0% 38.4× High JS Bloat
/support/ 5 57 0% 31.4× High JS Bloat
/get-involved/ 3 54 0% 28.2× High JS Bloat
/jobs/ 2 52 0% 28.0× High JS Bloat
/extensions/ 1 36 0% 112.4× High JS Bloat
/privacy-policy/ 1 77 0% 7.4× High JS Bloat
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 314 pages
projects.blender.org ×307
docs.blender.org ×307
devtalk.blender.org ×306
youtube.com ×306
developer.blender.org ×306
code.blender.org ×306
opendata.blender.org ×306
builder.blender.org ×306
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/blender.org

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar news Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to blender.org. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
blender.org (this site) 33 76 WordPress 9.2× 0
2ch-matomenews.com 58 76 WordPress 6.5× 0 Compare →
energy.endeavorb2b.com 58 75 WordPress 10.7× 1 Compare →
mccormickplace.com 58 76 WordPress 9.5× 2 Compare →
ahan-news.com 58 71 WordPress 4.5× 1 Compare →
schleupen.de 58 76 WordPress 15.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite blender.org when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

A 15 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

59
Homepage ACRI
53
Inner Avg ACRI
+6
ACRI Delta
20%
Homepage Ghost
27%
Inner Avg Ghost
7
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
46 40% product https://blender.org/features
46 40% about https://www.blender.org/about/voluntary-product-accessibility-template/
36 40% docs https://www.blender.org/support/tutorials/
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

C 40/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

48 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

375
Total Links
48
Unique Domains
25.0
Avg/Page
13%
Diversity
tiktok.com bsky.app projects.blender.org facebook.com code.blender.org linkedin.com youtube.com space.bilibili.com conference.blender.org mastodon.social
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 44.4

AI trust scores for the domains blender.org links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to blender.org. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Blender",
  "url": "https://blender.org",
  "logo": "https://www.blender.org/wp-content/themes/bthree/assets/icons/apple-touch-icon.png",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Blender",
  "url": "https://blender.org",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://blender.org/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Blender?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Blender does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Blender work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Blender."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for blender.org:

Current Score
76
Projected Score
92
Improvement
+16 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +3 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →