tinkoff.ru 35 F
🛡️ SEO 41 🤖 GEO 17 ⚡ Perf 38 🏗️ Arch 66

tinkoff.ru — Global SEODiff Score 35/100

tinkoff.ru
📊

AI crawlers face major barriers indexing tinkoff.ru, resulting in a low 10/100 ACRI rating that demands urgent attention. In the finance sector, tinkoff.ru underperforms relative to the average (57), indicating room for competitive improvement. The rendering approach is hybrid, with a moderate ghost ratio of 30% — most content is accessible without JS, though some elements are client-rendered. The bloated 50.0× token ratio highlights an urgent need to clean up non-content markup, scripts, and navigation clutter. Only 1 schema block is present — adding Organization, WebSite, and Breadcrumb schemas would significantly improve structured data coverage. The site maintains an open-door policy for AI crawlers — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other major agents are all allowed.

35
F — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Significant improvement opportunities. Start with AI Readiness (17).
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (1566×) → +5–10 pts
⚠️ Crawl Blocked: Rendering failed (script-heavy shell / hydration timeout)
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 21, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 5 snapshots
Mar 6 Mar 21
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
🔄 Mar 12 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 10 Content change detected
🔄 Mar 6 Content change detected
Does your site score higher than tinkoff.ru?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)41 × 0.25 = 10.2
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)17 × 0.40 = 6.8
⚡ Performance (20% weight)38 × 0.20 = 7.6
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)66 × 0.15 = 9.9
Weighted sum = 10.2 + 6.8 + 7.6 + 9.9
Global SEODiff Score = 35 (F)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
84
Rendering
avg 93
0
Structure
avg 35
82
Schema
avg 9
55
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1042
+77 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 77%
Score 10/100

tinkoff.ru punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why tinkoff.ru ranks here

Tech stackExpress
Industryfinance
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage1 blocks
Token bloat50×+

Fastest improvements

  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…

⚠️ Crawl Failed: Anti-Bot Protection Detected

Rendering failed (script-heavy shell / hydration timeout)

The scores below may not reflect actual site quality. The crawler received a challenge page instead of real content.

🛡️

Traditional SEO

41/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

155 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

290 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✗ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 0
  • ✗ Has <h2> headings — found 0
  • ✓ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✓ Canonical tag present → https://www.tbank.ru
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✗ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✓ og:title — Т‑Банк — финансовые услуги для физических и юридических лиц
  • ✓ og:description — Лучший банк 2024 года по версии Банки.ру. Входит в топ-5 лучших цифровых банков мира в 2025 году по версии TABInsights
  • ✓ og:image — preview
  • ✓ twitter:card — summary_large_image
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

17/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the finance sector, cardpay.com (ACRI: 82) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
tinkoff.ru
13
Your ACRI Score
82
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. cardpay.com has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses WordPress. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

👻
Shadow Content Detected: 30% of your page token budget is in non-rendered regions (JavaScript-dependent content that AI crawlers may not process). Combined with 1565.8x token bloat, AI models are using most of their context window on noise instead of your real content. This dramatically increases hallucination probability — models fill the gap with made-up facts.
Analyzing hallucination risk…

AI Visibility Gap Notice

This domain ranks well in traditional search but shows low AI extractability in our automated analysis. Another domain scored higher in our AI retrieval tests for overlapping queries.

13
tinkoff.ru ACRI
vs
82
cardpay.com ACRI
69-point ACRI gap
cardpay.com scored higher in AI extraction tests than tinkoff.ru
Evidence Score: 81/100 Retrieval MismatchHallucination Risk1566x Token Bloat
View Full Analysis → Run Hallucination Check

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 30%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 0/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 0 elements (0 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words38
Raw Density0.0%
💡Low structure score (0/100). Very little extractable text detected (38 words). AI crawlers may be blocked from accessing the real page content — check the Ghost Ratio and Bot Access sections.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ✅ Present
Product / Service Schema ✅ Present
Total Schema Blocks1 block(s) — Basic (low value for AI)

Schema Coverage Map

3/7 schema types detected
✅ Organization
✅ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

42
AI Extractability
High
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability42/100 — AI models can partially extract answers from this page
Crawl CostHigh (100/100) — expensive for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

1%
🗑️ 99%
Useful Content (661 B)Bloat (1010.1 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio50×+ — Bloated

Multimodal Readiness

Visual ContextNo images detected
Image Alt Coverage0 / 0 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 1010.8 KB, but only 661 B is text. 1% useful / 99% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (50×+) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 99.9% · SNR: 0.00 · Signal: 165 / Noise: 258588 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…
🧠

The LLM Interpretation

AI-VERIFIED

SEODiff AI analyzed the extracted content of tinkoff.ru and produced this structured business intelligence. Fields marked SEMANTIC VOID indicate information the AI could not find — a critical gap in your site’s machine-readability.

Core Offering
string — semantic void
Target Audience
string — semantic void
Pricing Model
string — semantic void
🏆 Competitive Moat
Технологическая компания с банковской лицензией, 70% сотрудников IT-специалисты
📊 Content Depth
3/10
🔄 Programmatic SEO Signals
НовостиДокументыКурсы валютРеквизитыЭкосистема Т-БанкаТ-ИнвестицииТ-МобайлТ-БизнесЛайфстайл-сервисыStories в мобильном банкеГолосовой помощникНейросети и роботыМобильные приложенияБиометрия для вашей защитыВсегда на связиДоставим быстро
⚡ Key Pain Points
• No meta descriptions
• Thin content on category pages
Analyzed by SEODiff AI · 2026-02-27

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkExpress
AI-Readiness Score55/100
ServerMSX Turbo R (R900) Web Server 1.13
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time2144 ms
Raw HTML Size1010.8 KB
Visible Text Size661 B

Performance & Speed

38/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

2144 ms
Slow — bots may time out or deprioritise

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

128
DOM nodes
1011 KB
HTML payload
Heavy page — consider reducing DOM complexity

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → no-cache, must-revalidate
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

66/100 15 % of Global Score 🟡 Medium Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://www.tbank.ru/sitemap.xml
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

0
internal links
0
external links
Very few internal links — crawlers may miss important pages

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✗ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → ru
  • ✗ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✗ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site is currently blocking AI crawlers. Unblock them and rescan to earn your AI-Verified badge.

AI-Verified badge for tinkoff.ru
Unverified — crawl access is blocked
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/tinkoff.ru" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=tinkoff.ru" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 10 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
13
Single-page score
-4
Consistent readability
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
9
Avg across 10 pages · Range 0–50
Total Words
578
Avg Bloat
91.5×
Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://tinkoff.ru/blog
Т‑Блог
blog 50 553.7× 217
https://tinkoff.ru/about
Тинькофф Банк
about 43 361.2× 361
https://tinkoff.ru/pricing pricing 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/products product 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/features product 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/docs docs 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/case-studies social-proof 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/faq support 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/integrations integrations 0 0.0× 0
https://tinkoff.ru/contact support 0 0.0× 0
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/blog/ 1 50 1% 553.7× Bot Blocked
/about/ 1 43 1% 361.2× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/faq/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/contact/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/features/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/docs/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/products/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/integrations/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
/pricing/ 1 0 0% 0.0× Low AI Readiness
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 10 pages
ok.ru ×2
tbank.ru ×2
t.me ×2
t-technologies.ru ×2
unidraw.io ×2
promokod.tbank.ru ×2
vk.com ×2
secrets.tbank.ru ×2
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/tinkoff.ru

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar finance Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to tinkoff.ru. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
tinkoff.ru (this site) 13 10 Express 1565.8× 1
stout.com 38 61 Express 3.5× 1 Compare →
capitallinkintl.com 38 69 Wix 265.6× 1 Compare →
bankturov.com.by 38 63 Custom / Proprietary 2.1× 0 Compare →
assets.alandsbanken.com 38 60 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 0 Compare →
fintechru.org 38 60 Custom / Proprietary 1.7× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite tinkoff.ru when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

D 2 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

43
Homepage ACRI
50
Inner Avg ACRI
-7
ACRI Delta
60%
Homepage Ghost
70%
Inner Avg Ghost
42
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
50 70% blog https://tinkoff.ru/blog
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

F 15/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

13 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

26
Total Links
13
Unique Domains
13.0
Avg/Page
50%
Diversity
tbank.ru ok.ru promokod.tbank.ru education.tbank.ru secrets.tbank.ru t-j.ru cdn.tbank.ru t.me business.tbank.ru unidraw.io
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 17.1

AI trust scores for the domains tinkoff.ru links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to tinkoff.ru. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Tinkoff",
  "url": "https://tinkoff.ru",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://tinkoff.ru/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 0% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for tinkoff.ru:

Current Score
10
Projected Score
19
Improvement
+9 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →