trello.com 55 D
🛡️ SEO 35 🤖 GEO 53 ⚡ Perf 59 🏗️ Arch 89

trello.com — Global SEODiff Score 55/100

trello.com
📋 Executive Audit

Trello.com operates as a leading SaaS platform in task and project management, with a strong global presence and a well-established brand. Its Global SEODiff Score of 55 reflects moderate search visibility performance, placing it below industry benchmarks despite a robust technical foundation. The ACRI Grade of F and ACRI Score of 35 indicate significant shortcomings in content relevance, user intent alignment, and semantic coherence, which undermine its ability to rank for high-intent queries. While the site ranks highly in Architecture (89) and demonstrates strong technical hygiene—evidenced by a declared sitemap, HSTS enforcement, and open bot access—it struggles with content depth and structure, particularly in Semantic Structure (27) and Retrieval Robustness (10), signaling critical gaps in how search engines interpret and retrieve its content.

Trello excels in technical performance and accessibility: it achieves a Performance Score of 59, with a relatively fast TTFB of 944ms and a well-structured DOM with only 10% ghost ratio. The site is accessible to major AI crawlers, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and Google’s extended bots, and lacks AI-blocking meta tags, supporting its AI-readiness (score: 53). However, the high token bloat ratio (27.1x) and low useful text ratio (10,562 bytes out of 286KB HTML) reveal substantial non-content bloat—likely from excessive JavaScript, redundant components, or unoptimized frameworks like Contentful. This inefficiency dilutes content signal strength and hampers both search engine and AI agent understanding of core offerings.

Architecturally, Trello demonstrates strong internal link distribution and a declared sitemap, but suffers from a lack of structured data: zero schema blocks across key types like Organization, Product, Breadcrumb, or FAQ. This absence deprives the site of rich snippet opportunities and weakens semantic context. The low word count (1,674) and poor retrieval robustness suggest content is overly concise or fragmented, failing to cover topics comprehensively. To improve, Trello should prioritize semantic enrichment, implement schema markup, reduce token bloat, and expand content depth to align with user intent and AI search expectations.

✦ Executive Audit synthesized by SEODiff AI · Mar 5, 2026
55
D — Global SEODiff Score
Comprehensive search visibility assessment
Below average — Traditional SEO (35) has the most room for improvement.
🎯 Top Fix: Reduce token bloat (27×) → +5–10 pts
🔬 Automated SEODiff Assessment · Snapshot: Mar 17, 2026 · 📋 API
📈 ACRI Trend 7 snapshots
Feb 23 Mar 17
🔔 Recent AI Indexing Activity
No recent changes detected by adaptive crawler.
Does your site score higher than trello.com?
Run the same 40-signal audit on your own domain — free, instant results.
Scan Your Site Free →
🧮 Score Transparency — How is this calculated?
🛡️ Traditional SEO (25% weight)35 × 0.25 = 8.8
🤖 AI Readiness / GEO (40% weight)53 × 0.40 = 21.2
⚡ Performance (20% weight)59 × 0.20 = 11.8
🏗️ Architecture & Trust (15% weight)89 × 0.15 = 13.3
Weighted sum = 8.8 + 21.2 + 11.8 + 13.3
Global SEODiff Score = 55 (D)
📊 ACRI Sub-Scores (AI Readiness Detail)
100
Bot Access
avg 92
97
Rendering
avg 93
13
Structure
avg 35
0
Schema
avg 9
70
Tech Stack
avg 63
🔀
Visibility Delta: Google vs AI
Google (Tranco)
Top 0.1%
Rank #1139
+47 pts
Gap
AI (ACRI)
Top 47%
Score 64/100

trello.com punches above its weight in AI — AI visibility exceeds Google ranking. This is a competitive moat worth protecting. ACRI measures technical crawler readiness. Read the methodology →

Why trello.com ranks here

Tech stackContentful
Industrysaas
RenderingHybrid
Schema coverage0 blocks
Token bloat27.1×

Fastest improvements

  • Add basic Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to fix “0 schema blocks” (see Schema Coverage).
  • Reduce token bloat (navigation/footer/code) so agents reach your main content faster (see Token Bloat).
  • Create an llms.txt file so AI crawlers can discover your content structure without heavy crawling. Generate llms.txt →
  • Run a full entropy audit to find which DOM regions waste the most tokens. Run Entropy Audit →
🧪

JavaScript Rendering Check

We check what AI crawlers miss when they skip JavaScript execution.

Running headless browser to simulate AI extraction…
🛡️

Traditional SEO

35/100 25 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

📝 Title Tag

64 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 30–60 characters for SERP display.

📋 Meta Description

197 chars
Too long

Optimal range: 120–160 characters for snippet control.

🔤 Heading Hierarchy

  • ✓ Exactly 1 <h1> tag — found 1
  • ✓ Has <h2> headings — found 7
  • ✗ <h2> not before <h1>

🔍 Indexability

  • ✗ Canonical tag present
  • ✓ No noindex directive
  • ✓ Meta viewport set
  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ➖ Hreflang tags — N/A (single language site)
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed by robots.txt

🌐 Social / OpenGraph

  • ✗ og:title
  • ✗ og:description
  • ✗ og:image
  • ✗ twitter:card
📐 How the SEO Pillar score is calculated

SEO Pillar = Title (20 pts) + Meta Desc (20 pts) + Heading Hierarchy (20 pts) + Indexability (20 pts) + Social/OG (20 pts)

Each sub-score is derived from the checks above. Canonical tag, lang attribute, og:image, and a single H1 are the highest-impact items.

🤖

AI Readiness / GEO

53/100 40 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

This pillar aggregates citation share, hallucination risk, bot access, schema health, and content extractability. The individual diagnostic sections below contribute to this score.

🔗

Citation Alternatives

Research
💡
Insight: In the saas sector, smahospital.jp (ACRI: 84) currently has stronger AI extractability. AI models tend to prefer sources with higher semantic structure and schema coverage. Domains with ACRI < 40 see 3.5× more hallucinations. Read the research →
trello.com
35
Your ACRI Score
84
Industry Peer ACRI
AI models prioritize pages with strong semantic structure and schema coverage. smahospital.jp has schema coverage of 1 blocks and uses Next.js. Improve your score by implementing the remediation patches below.
📊 Side-by-Side Comparison →
🚨

Hallucination Risk

Research

Is AI lying about your brand? This panel measures how likely LLMs are to hallucinate facts when extracting information from your page.

Analyzing hallucination risk…

🤖 Bot Access Matrix

GPTBot (OpenAI)
Allowed
ClaudeBot (Anthropic)
Allowed
CCBot (Common Crawl)
Allowed
Google-Extended
Allowed
Googlebot
Allowed

👻 Rendering (Ghost Ratio) Docs

Ghost Ratio 10%
0% — Safe 50% 100% — Risk
Status Server-Side Rendered (Safe)
Rendering Type Hybrid

📊 Structure & Information Density Docs

Structure Grade 13/100 — Poor
Structured Elements 8 elements (8 lists, 0 rows, 0 headers)
Total Words1674
Raw Density0.5%
💡Low structure score (13/100). Your content appears as a wall of text with few structured HTML elements. You have 8 list items, 0 table rows, 0 table headers. Convert features into <ul> lists and data into <table> elements to help AI models extract structured information.

🏷️ Schema Health Docs

Organization Schema ❌ Missing
Product / Service Schema ⚠️ Not Found
Total Schema Blocks0 — No JSON-LD detected

Schema Coverage Map

0/7 schema types detected
❌ Organization
❌ Product/Service
❌ Breadcrumb
❌ FAQ
❌ Article
❌ WebSite
💡Organization schema missing. AI models cannot identify your brand entity. Without it, your brand won't appear in Knowledge Panels or be associated with your content.
💡Product / Service schema missing. AI models don't know this is a SaaS product. Add Product or SoftwareApplication schema so AI understands what you offer and can surface pricing/features.
💡BreadcrumbList schema missing. AI cannot understand your site hierarchy or how pages relate to each other.
💡FAQ schema missing. Adding FAQPage schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs for Featured Snippets and chatbot answers.
💡WebSite schema missing. Add WebSite + SearchAction so Google can generate a Sitelinks Search Box for your brand in AI results.

📐 AI Efficiency Metrics Docs

32
AI Extractability
Medium
Crawl Cost
None
Blocklist Risk
Extractability32/100 — AI models can barely extract answers from this page
Crawl CostMedium (60/100) — moderate for AI crawlers to process
Blocklist RiskNone — 0 of 5 AI crawlers blocked

Token Bloat Research

3%
🗑️ 97%
Useful Content (10.3 KB)Bloat (269.2 KB)
Token Bloat Ratio27.1× — Heavy

Multimodal Readiness

Visual Context77% Optimized for Vision
Image Alt Coverage10 / 13 images have alt text

TDM Rights

TDM-Reservation HeaderNot set
X-Robots-Tag: noaiNot set
💡Your HTML is 279.5 KB, but only 10.3 KB is text. 3% useful / 97% bloat. AI crawlers have limited context windows (e.g. 128k tokens). This level of bloat (27.1×) risks context-window truncation by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Reduce inline scripts, CSS, hydration payloads, and tracking code.

🔥 Structural Entropy Check Research

0 Entropy
Poor Token Bloat: High
Noise Ratio: 96.3% · SNR: 0.04 · Signal: 2640 / Noise: 68920 tokens

🔬 AI-Crawler Simulation

See your website the way AI crawlers do. CSS stripped, structure labeled, content chunked.

🌐
This is what humans see — styled, branded, visual.
Toggle to "AI Agent View" to see what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers actually extract from this page.
🤖

AI Answer Preview

NEW

See how AI models summarize your site. Left: your actual content. Right: what the LLM extracts and says about you.

Simulating AI extraction…

🔧 Tech Stack

FrameworkContentful
AI-Readiness Score70/100
ServerAtlassianEdge
CDN
HTTP Status200
Load Time507 ms
Raw HTML Size279.5 KB
Visible Text Size10.3 KB

Performance & Speed

59/100 20 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

⏱️ Time to First Byte

507 ms
Acceptable — room for improvement

Google considers <200 ms "good". AI crawlers may have even shorter timeouts.

📦 Page Weight

1182
DOM nodes
280 KB
HTML payload
Moderate weight — acceptable for most scenarios

🗄️ Cache & CDN

  • ✓ Cache-Control header → max-age=0, s-maxage=604800, stale-while-revalidate=604800, stale-if-error=604800, no-cache="Set-Cookie"
  • ✗ CDN cache status
  • ✗ CDN detected

🔬 Tracker Tax

0
tracker scripts
0
third-party domains
0.0%
token overhead
Minimal tracker load — clean signal for bots
📐 How the Performance Pillar score is calculated

Perf Pillar = TTFB (35 pts) + Page Weight (25 pts) + Cache/CDN (20 pts) + Tracker Tax (20 pts)

TTFB <200 ms = full marks. DOM >3000 or payload >300 KB incurs heavy penalties. Tracker scripts beyond 5 reduce score.

🏗️

Architecture & Trust

89/100 15 % of Global Score 🟢 High Confidence

🗺️ Sitemap & Robots

  • ✓ Sitemap declared in robots.txt → https://trello.com/sitemap-index.xml.gz
  • ✓ Googlebot allowed
  • ✓ GPTBot allowed
  • ✓ ClaudeBot allowed

🔗 Linking

63
internal links
22
external links
Good internal linking — helps crawlers discover content

🔒 Security & Trust

  • ✓ HSTS header (Strict-Transport-Security)
  • ✗ Content-Security-Policy header
  • ✓ HTTP status 200 OK (got 200)

♿ Accessibility Signals

  • ✓ HTML lang attribute → en-US
  • ✓ Meta viewport for mobile
  • ✓ Single H1 for screen readers
📐 How the Architecture Pillar score is calculated

Arch Pillar = Sitemap & Robots (30 pts) + Linking (25 pts) + Security (25 pts) + Accessibility (20 pts)

Having a valid sitemap, allowing AI bots, HSTS, and a good internal link count are the highest-impact items.

🏅 AI-Verified Trust Badge

Your site scores 35/100. Reach 80+ to unlock the green "AI-Verified" badge. Fix the issues below to improve your score.

AI-Verified badge for trello.com
Pending Audit — score below 80 threshold
<a href="https://seodiff.io/radar/domains/trello.com" rel="noopener"><img src="https://seodiff.io/api/v1/badge?domain=trello.com" alt="AI-Verified by SEODiff" width="280" height="52"></a>

💡 Paste in your site footer, GitHub README, or email signature. Badge updates automatically as your score changes.

� Deep Crawl Analysis 355 pages · Deep-10

Homepage ACRI
35
Single-page score
-13
Moderate hidden bloat
Δ delta
Site-Wide ACRI
22
Avg across 355 pages · Range 19–43
🔍
Hidden Bloat Detected

Homepage scores 35, but internal pages average only 22 — a -13-point gap. Blogs, docs, and legacy content are dragging down AI readability site-wide.

Topical Cohesion
12%
Topical Drift
TF-IDF cosine similarity
Total Words
15912
Avg Bloat
474.5×
RAG Fractures [?]
2
⚠️
2 RAG-Chunking Fractures Detected

Poorly formatted tables or pricing grids on 2 pages will be split incorrectly during RAG chunking, causing AI models to hallucinate prices and features.

Page Type ACRI Token Bloat Words Status
https://trello.com/docs
Get Started Building on Trello
pricing 43 159.3× 329 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://trello.com/help
Trello support | Trello | Atlassian Support
support 37 277.0× 59
https://trello.com/api
The Trello REST API
pricing 29 1315.1× 74 ⚠️ RAG Fracture
https://trello.com/solutions
Trello
pricing 22 468.4× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/features
Trello
pricing 22 468.4× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/products
Trello
pricing 22 468.4× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/blog
Trello
pricing 22 468.4× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/case-studies
Trello
pricing 22 468.4× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/responsabilidade-do-time-aB9Rct1r
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/service-desk-vRF0JhEV
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/trello-bugtracker--ks3EbyBl
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/service-desk-incident-impact-analysis-GSJ9Vgm2
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/building-a-customer-feedback-program-C2ZIBftB
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/demande-de-fonctionnalite-XhDMqBJf
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/a-customer-support-solution-by-crmble-PgxgDekN
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/requisicao-de-novas-funcionalidades-GvE0qwBt
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/customer-success-management-ynXIjAef
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/planejamento-do-suporte-mqP1K628
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/customer-support-template-2BdBbCTm
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
https://trello.com/templates/support/partage-des-responsabilites-ar7KI7dZ
Trello
pricing 22 468.3× 44 💰 Pricing
Showing 20 of 100 pages. Unlock full subpage table →
📂
Health by Sub-Directory
Average ACRI and top issues aggregated by URL path prefix
Path Pages Avg ACRI Ghost % Bloat Top Issue
/templates/ 343 22 1% 468.2× Bot Blocked
/contact/ 1 19 1% 2332.1× Bot Blocked
/blog/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/faq/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/careers/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/terms/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/case-studies/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/docs/ 1 43 1% 159.3× Bot Blocked
/help/ 1 37 1% 277.0× Bot Blocked
/api/ 1 29 1% 1315.1× Bot Blocked
/solutions/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/products/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
/features/ 1 22 1% 468.4× Bot Blocked
🔗
Outbound External Citations
0 unique external domains cited across 355 pages
help.trello.com ×351
atlassian.com ×4
developer.atlassian.com ×2
status.developer.atlassian.com ×2
support.atlassian.com ×1
community.atlassian.com ×1
trello.status.atlassian.com ×1
go.trello.com ×1
🔄 Re-Crawl & Update 📡 Track this Domain

Scores update automatically each month. Create a free account for on-demand re-crawls (3/month free).

🔌 API Access

Pull this data programmatically. All sub-page metrics are available via our public API.

curl https://seodiff.io/api/v1/deep10/domain/trello.com

Get your free API key — 100 requests/month included.

🔗 Similar saas Sites

Domains with a similar tech stack, industry, and AI readiness profile to trello.com. Compare side-by-side.

Domain ACRI AI Score Tech Stack Token Bloat Schema
trello.com (this site) 35 64 Contentful 27.1× 0
wordfeud-helper.com 60 78 Cloudflare Pages 11.0× 0 Compare →
datacredito.com.co 60 74 Adobe Experience Manager 2.8× 0 Compare →
chicasyamantes.com 60 79 Cloudflare Pages 3.7× 0 Compare →
mcdonalds.hu 60 79 Adobe Experience Manager 6.3× 0 Compare →
tcloudfamily.com 60 80 Custom / Proprietary 1.6× 0 Compare →
Compare All 5 Similar Sites →

📊 Semantic Share of Voice

How often would an AI cite trello.com when users ask about topics in this domain's niche? We run entity queries through our 188k-page search index and measure citation probability.

Analyzing citation landscape…

🎭

Bait & Switch Delta

D 12 PAGES

Compares your homepage rendering quality with inner pages. A high drift score means AI crawlers see a polished homepage but degraded inner content — the "bait & switch" that erodes trust.

22
Homepage ACRI
26
Inner Avg ACRI
-4
ACRI Delta
70%
Homepage Ghost
74%
Inner Avg Ghost
42
Drift Score [?]
Worst Inner Pages
19 90% support https://trello.com/contact
29 90% pricing https://trello.com/api
37 90% support https://trello.com/help
🛡️

E-E-A-T Trust Signals

D 25/100

Trust indicators extracted from surface pages. These signals help AI systems verify your site's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.

Physical Address
Phone Number
Email Contact
About Page
Contact Page
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Named Leadership
🔗

Citation Profile

9 DOMAINS

Outbound citation patterns across surface-crawled pages. Sites that cite diverse, authoritative sources signal higher E-E-A-T to AI systems.

21
Total Links
9
Unique Domains
1.8
Avg/Page
43%
Diversity
help.trello.com atlassian.com status.developer.atlassian.com developer.atlassian.com community.developer.atlassian.com go.trello.com community.atlassian.com trello.status.atlassian.com support.atlassian.com
🏘️ Outbound Neighborhood Trust Avg Trust: 4.4

AI trust scores for the domains trello.com links to. Citing high-trust sources lifts your own credibility signal.

🩹

Remediation Patches

COPY-PASTE

Auto-generated code fixes tailored to trello.com. Copy and paste these into your codebase to improve AI visibility. These patches are mathematically proven to increase extraction accuracy →

Add Organization JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
AI models cannot identify your brand entity without Organization schema. This is the #1 fix for AI visibility.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "name": "Trello",
  "url": "https://trello.com",
  "logo": "https://bxp-content-static.prod.public.atl-paas.net/img/favicon.ico",
  "sameAs": []
}
</script>
Add WebSite + SearchAction JSON-LD
High Impact ⏱ 5 min
Enables the Sitelinks Search Box in Google and allows AI to understand your site structure.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "WebSite",
  "name": "Trello",
  "url": "https://trello.com",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://trello.com/search?q={search_term_string}",
    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
  }
}
</script>
Reduce Token Bloat
Medium Impact ⏱ 1–2 hrs
Only 3% of your HTML is useful content. AI crawlers waste context window tokens on bloat.
html
<!-- Move inline CSS to external stylesheets -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">

<!-- Move inline scripts to external files with defer -->
<script src="/js/app.js" defer></script>

<!-- Remove duplicate navigation blocks -->
<!-- Keep only ONE <nav> in the <header> -->

<!-- Ensure <main> wraps your primary content -->
<main>
  <!-- Your content here — this is what AI sees first -->
</main>
Add FAQ Schema
Medium Impact ⏱ 10 min
FAQ schema lets AI models directly extract Q&A pairs. This is the easiest way to get featured in AI responses.
html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is Trello?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Add your answer here — describe what Trello does in 1-2 sentences."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How does Trello work?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Explain the key features and how users interact with Trello."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
📈

Projected Impact

ROI EST.

If you apply the patches above, here's the estimated improvement for trello.com:

Current Score
64
Projected Score
82
Improvement
+18 pts
Add Organization schema +6 pts
Add WebSite schema +4 pts
Reduce token bloat +5 pts
Add FAQ schema +3 pts

*Estimates based on SEODiff's scoring model. Actual results depend on implementation quality.

📋 Data Export

Download scores and metadata for audits, client reports, or CI/CD pipelines. Exports contain computed metrics only (no copyrighted content).

All data is generated automatically and updated with each crawl. JSON exports contain scores and metadata only (no copyrighted content).

Is this your company?

Monitor your AI visibility score weekly and get alerted when changes happen.

Start Free →

🧭 Self-Diffing (Private Layer)

For owned domains, combine this world snapshot with private drift + regression history.
Template Drift
Track in My Site
Drift → Traffic Impact
In development coming soon
Regression Incidents
Track in My Site
Internal Linking
Deep Audit graph
Semantic Structure
GEO view in Deep Audit
Content Quality
Thin/duplicate tracking

🕒 History

Score over timeAvailable in My Site history
Drift eventsTemplate timeline + incidents
Drift → Revenue AttributionComing soon
Schema/rendering/extractability changesTracked per scan in project history

🧠 AI Citation Graph

How this domain is cited across the machine-readable web

7.7
AI-Trust
#541
Global Rank
69%
Percentile
75
Inbound AI Links
0
Outbound AI Links
57
Avg Inbound ACRI
11%
AI-Restricted Backlinks
Top AI Referrers
Domain ACRI AI-Trust Direction
atlassian.com 56 3.5 ← cites you
onepagecrm.com 70 0.0 ← cites you
bongdainfox.tv 65 0.0 ← cites you
extravaganzi.com 64 0.0 ← cites you
snltheexhibition.com 64 0.0 ← cites you
xoilaczzgg.cc 64 0.0 ← cites you
peepoople.com 64 0.0 ← cites you
workingwithmen.org 64 0.0 ← cites you
xoilacvzv.cc 64 0.0 ← cites you
coveritlive.com 64 0.0 ← cites you
View Full AI-Trust Leaderboard →
🔍 Found indexing issues?
Run a free deep audit to diagnose crawled-not-indexed, soft 404s, redirect errors, and more.
Free Deep Audit → GSC Error Guide →