High-profile brands that rank well in traditional search but show low AI extractability. This index highlights potential visibility gaps — and practical steps to close them.
msn.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
google.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
youtube.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
people.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
investopedia.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
samsungcloud.com has low AI extractability compared to smahospital.jp — a 84-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
zillow.com has low AI extractability compared to 163.com — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
weibo.com has low AI extractability compared to rakuten.co.jp — a 73-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
hepsiburada.com has low AI extractability compared to ihc.ru — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
archive.org has low AI extractability compared to editage.jp — a 76-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
vk.com has low AI extractability compared to martin-sad.ru — a 87-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
wsj.com has low AI extractability compared to onetrust.com — a 72-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
tripadvisor.com has low AI extractability compared to parallels.com — a 73-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
playrix.com has low AI extractability compared to qnap.com — a 76-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
vk.ru has low AI extractability compared to martin-sad.ru — a 87-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
allegro.pl has low AI extractability compared to demandbase.com — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
xiaohongshu.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
allaboutcookies.org has low AI extractability compared to duosecurity.com — a 75-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
mega.co.nz has low AI extractability compared to otto.de — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
leboncoin.fr has low AI extractability compared to hdfcbank.com — a 79-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
tinkoff.ru has low AI extractability compared to cardpay.com — a 82-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
duckduckgo.com has low AI extractability compared to martin-sad.ru — a 87-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
registrar-servers.com has low AI extractability compared to zoom.us — a 70-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
threads.com has low AI extractability compared to adwordsguide.com — a 86-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
usatoday.com has low AI extractability compared to smahospital.jp — a 84-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
vivoglobal.com has low AI extractability compared to otto.de — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
snapchat.com has low AI extractability compared to rndirectors.com — a 85-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
huffpost.com has low AI extractability compared to rndirectors.com — a 85-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
dropcatch.com has low AI extractability compared to editage.jp — a 76-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
leiniao.com has low AI extractability compared to infoseek.co.jp — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
etsy.com has low AI extractability compared to tp-link.com — a 72-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
reuters.com has low AI extractability compared to youjizz.com — a 78-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
shutterstock.com has low AI extractability compared to walkme.com — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
giphy.com has low AI extractability compared to adwordsguide.com — a 86-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
bloomberg.com has low AI extractability compared to merriam-webster.com — a 73-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
wikimedia.org has low AI extractability compared to medi.de — a 82-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
jetbrains.com has low AI extractability compared to demandbase.com — a 74-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
dailymotion.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
googlevideo.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
instagram.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
bing.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
applovin.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
outlook.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
dotomi.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
palmplaystore.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ya.ru has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
naver.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
eye4.cn has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
google.com.br has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
fb.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
pinterest.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
withgoogle.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ui.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
kwai.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
twitter.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
soundcloud.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
canva.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
taobao.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
x.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
duolingo.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
shein.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
flickr.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
genius.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
roblox.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
skype.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
pandora.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
aparat.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ubi.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
youku.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ecosia.org has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
weather.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
bsky.app has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
disqus.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ok.ru has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ouest-france.fr has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
alibaba.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
facebook.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
cambridge.org has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
spotify.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
ea.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
daum.net has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
google.com.hk has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
hostgator.com has low AI extractability compared to hikkoshizamurai.jp — a 88-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
linktr.ee has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
note.com has low AI extractability compared to safely.co.jp — a 90-point ACRI gap worth investigating.
Filter 100k+ domains for high Tranco rank (top 50k) with ACRI < 30 and token bloat > 5x — identifying well-ranked sites whose HTML structure may limit AI readability.
Run each candidate through a simulated retrieval pipeline using our FAISS-indexed Golden Semantic Strings. If another domain is retrieved instead, this signals a potential visibility gap.
Simulate LLM extraction against the page DOM. If the model produces > 25% inaccurate facts, the page structure may be limiting what AI can reliably extract.
Combine retrieval mismatch (50%), extraction risk (30%), token bloat (10%), and rank signal (10%) into a composite evidence score. Require ≥ 0.6 for publication.
Run a free AI extractability check on your domain and see how your site performs in AI-powered retrieval.
Run Free AI Visibility Scan →